LET US ALL HELP RAYMOND BUILD THIS NEW FREE ENERGY MACHINE.

[seychelles]

HE DESERVES RESPECT, OUR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND WE CAN ALL JOIN IN REPLICATING
THIS SIMPLE DEVICE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J8uPhKwjG4

[Floor]

Some observations.

1. We don't know the exact lifting height of the 172 coins.
2. A long run time (maybe 1 hour ? ) will give a more accurate result.
3. An auto counter installed upon the lifter would give an exact count of the number of
times lifted in 1 hour.

Note...
It looks like only 1/2 (one direction) of the the back and forth motion of the
output is being utilized.

If this is correct, then the out put is actually 2 times more than is being shown in
the video ? 

calculations
5.67 grams per coin, times 72 coins.

5.76  x  72 =  408.24 grams total lifting per stroke

130 lifts in 103 seconds  =   1.262  seconds per lift
(from 5 minutes and 54 seconds to 7 minutes and 37 seconds in the
video = 103 seconds)

lifting height = 3/8 or 0.375 inch ? (approximation from video, could be way off)
should be measured / stated.

0.375 inch = 0.00952 meter

0.00952  x 130 repetitions  = 1.2376 meters
... ... ... ... ...
102 grams exerts 1 newton

408.24 grams  / 102 grams = 4.00 newtons
... ... ... ... ...
4 newtons x 1.2376 meters = 4.9504 joules in 103 seconds

4.9504 joules / 103 seconds =  0.048 joules per second
                    or
0.048 watts mechanical out put
                   and
0.01 amp x 4.2 volts = 0.042 watts electrical input.
... ... ... ... ... ...
  Opinion
too close to call unless mechanical output is actually 2 times this 0.048 watts ?

  nice job

[Magluvin]

With the magnet device running by way of the motor, the large magnet has a lot of mass inertia when the fiels align to lift the quarters. So the lift is hit with a bit of impulse rather than direct current into the motor that lifted the 10 quarters..  I see what he is trying to convey. That the device is able to output more than the motor can do alone. Would be interesting to pulse the motor only setup and have the cup reach an upward limit similar to the magnet device cups distance upward. The put all the quarters in the cup and time the input to make the cup emulate the same motion of the magnet device cup of quarters and see how much more energy it takes to accomplish the same motion as the machine. Seems the pulsed voltage would need to be a bit higher than the test voltages shown.
Kind of a Bedini concept by use of inertia to deliver output.

Mags

[Floor]

@ Magluvin

I agree.

Given that my guess at the height lifted is accurate (who knows),
the energy expended as acceleration against inertia,
would account for enough energy to make output O.U.

Also is not the" flip flop" action,  under power during both motion directions as well ?

Also, the use of an eccentric pulley in the lifting would be a more efficient output mode.

[synchro1]

Raymond may have designed a mechanisem that transfers the 3 to 1 sheer to push pull advantage. The inertia Magluvin and Floor refer to engage like a spring storing power at the gate. I believe Raymond has achieved Overunity. Ray states that his 5th Angled Generator cuts the input twice. 8 would reduce to 2. That would equate to 6 to 2 or 3 to 1.

In the end he inputs 1 part and 3 parts return. Original input Halved twice.