Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[nix85]

There is nothing to quote, you replied to something addressed to lanca, like i already wrote 2 times.

[lancaIV]

Good Morning,
20 000 / 250 = work C.O.P. 80
1- ( 250/20 000)= 0,9875 the process efficiency ,called eta

nix85,You are "dropping" many words into the ring,
the consumer,in search of a energy solution,for his needs,does not interest how this process is called,how microphysically the conversion from a device happens,probably the consumer an analphabet !
Work with plausible,impressive,examples :
there are many commercial/new inventive products claims in efficiency,which by consumer-care organisations physical study does not hold their claims .
This we can take as fact,by this organisation information and comparing own product use experience .

Is a converter OU or free energy or miracle or whatsever to be calling ?
Unimportant !
The device has to reach the result for which it was bought ! Hoping by warranted and longer life-time !
I do not use applications ( hard-/software) because their Trademark,only because their functionality !
When such a centrifugal-boiler like this from Infinitysav works with such a claimed efficiency result : fine !
If not : also fine !
I am not in this company financial invested,nor their employee,so not from their product/s efficiency/claims dependent !

It is sometimes ridiculous,how intensive people defend something and this probably contradictory !
And sometimes positive/negative comments about products are bought ! Own product company worker/family or commercial "product placement" agencies !

With Your "promotion" behaviour You,nix85,even does not help this company Infinitysav and development from a good idea,functionality confirmed,has often a long "ready to market" process steps time,independent from accompaning partners :

Schukey heat engine,anno 70' process patented ,last century ! BMW,VW involved.

When You have a great house with an high warm air conditionig need in cold season so try to get such a heat generator kind (  if not existent : + central heater tube + radiator  installation ) and become lucky and cause economical satisfied !
Infinitysav 5000 US$ +X dealer margin + professional all house rooms "central heater parts"  installation : 20 000 US$ ?

You do not depend of my meaning !

And to do conversation  with You about OU/FE/MIRACLE up to 50 years,2021-2071 : 


Sincere
OCWL

p.s.: Kalinowski " Foldable Portable Building" : claimed 60 sqm commercial price : 15 000 US$
       probably a 5 KW centrifugal-boiler in need ,price range(all included) 2000 US$ MAX !

[nix85]

Good Morning,
20 000 / 250 = work C.O.P. 80
1- ( 250/20 000)= 0,9875 the process efficiency ,called eta

nix85,You are "dropping" many words into the ring,
the consumer,in search of a energy solution,for his needs,does not interest how this process is called,how microphysically the conversion from a device happens,probably the consumer an analphabet !
Work with plausible,impressive,examples..

Again you are pushing this nonsense that generating 20kW of heat using 250W input is 98% efficiency.

No, it's 8000% efficiency.

I don't care for semantics, OU or FE, but FE is commonly understood to cover solar, wind, tide and similar energy sources, so sticking to OU is more appropriate.

[lancaIV]

I have not a problem with the term " efficiency" !
Is for You this term fixed defind ?
When a windgenerator is 60% efficient,its efficiency by Physics view : 60% from ideal 59,5% = ?
When a reversible heat/cold engine is 80% efficient,its efficieny is 80% from "ideal 1" = ?
1 .Betz-limit 2.Carnot-limit

Energy= Exergy + Anergy

Question : how much cold water,by which temperature,has to be introduced per min./sec. to the centrifugal-boiler system,to get this C.O.P. 80 hot/cold : 1 - eta result ,eta = Carnot-Wirkungsgrad efficiency ,better for not
misunderstatement with common used " expression" ,as seen here :

                                                                CARNOT FACTOR

1-eta= Tmax/Tmin
heat reservoir/cold reservoir spread or tension number

[nix85]

You do have a problem with it if you claim 8000% efficiency is 98% efficiency.