Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[stivep]

stivep
If this is true can you name anything anywhere NOT in perpetual motion?.
I mean if what your implying is true then even a child should be able to name one thing not in perpetual motion.
I think it's comical because I have yet to meet anyone who has either the balls or brains to answer the question.
It's pretty pretty simple... put up or shut up.

Regards
AC

I do it with pleasure.
Talking about perpetual motion we mean the machine, device, of some free energy dreamersl
At first we need to specify what is perpetual motion machine (of the first kind and second kind):

Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system.
A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely
without an external energy source.

This kind of machine is impossible, as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion thermodynamics.

The answer to your question now:
any motion of the machine that doesn't violate the first or second law of thermodynamics is not perpetual motion of that  machine
_______________________________________________________

You may catch me on semantics, but not much beyond that.

Wesley

[pix]

@StivepResonant transformer - YouTube
I think Stepanov transformer is just a simple  resonant circuit.
Inductance is transformer secondary,on secondary side matched capacitor.
At resonance magnetizing current in primary is at minimum, large current and voltage is circulating between secondary of transformer and capacitor.
Driving frequency on primary is probably greater than 50Hz, that's why diodes on the output.
Current is rectified and may be used for heating .

[onepower]

stivep

Talking about perpetual motion we mean the machine, device, of some free energy dreamersl
At first we need to specify what is perpetual motion machine (of the first kind and second kind):

You didn't say a perpetual motion machine you said perpetual motion is impossible which is obviously incorrect.

Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system.
A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely
without an external energy source.

This kind of machine is impossible, as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

I call this nonsense the false cause fallacy gambit.

This is when the person claims a free energy device cannot work because...
1)It cannot work infinitely without an external energy source.
2)It would violate the Conservation of Energy.
3)It would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

It's a false cause fallacy because the critics falsely assumed the device must violate any number of laws while being completely ignorant to any facts. Ergo, if they have no idea how it could possibly work then how would they know it violates any laws?. They cannot because there conclusion is based on a lack of knowledge and understanding. I mean, to a dimwit everything is impossible.

Regards
AC

[stivep]

stivep
<sub>You didn't say a perpetual motion machine you said perpetual motion is impossible which is obviously incorrect.

I call this nonsense the false cause fallacy gambit.

This is when the person claims a free energy device cannot work because...
1)It cannot work infinitely without an external energy source.
2)It would violate the Conservation of Energy.
3)It would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

Regards
AC</sub>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion thermodynamics.
The answer to your question:
any motion of the machine that doesn't violate the first or second law of thermodynamics is not perpetual motion of that  machine
_______________________________________________________
You may catch me on semantics, but not much beyond that.

You saw the opportunity to challenge me, so you did.
Now you complaining that, Wesley was prepared for that,

This is when the person claims a free energy device cannot work because...

Free Energy is not perpetual motion,= no gain to us.
Free Energy is only the energy  that we don't have to pay for.-but  it can work_(physics) for us.

It's a false cause fallacy because the critics falsely assumed the device must violate any number of laws while being completely ignorant to any facts. Ergo, if they have no idea how it could possibly work then how would they know it violates any laws?. They cannot because there conclusion is based on a lack of knowledge and understanding. I mean, to a dimwit everything is impossible.

Physics is not based on belief or assumption
Physics doesn't recognize God.
Physics is based on models, and models are based on  laws.
-there is no ignorance to the facts, it is just recognition or lack of recognition of the facts.
But  at first those facts must exist and manifest its presence.

Work_(physics) is the only factor treated as an evidence of fact for FE community.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics)

I mean, to a dimwit everything is impossible

Unfortunately according to current physics,not much of this exotic BS is possible:
Overunity-  not possible
Perpetual motion machine -not possible
ether/ eather - doesn't exist
time travel, - not possible
antigravity - not possible
Wesley

[alan]

Free energy is potential regauging, because a potential can do free work, they convert virtual energy flux to observable energy, from seemingly nothing to a forcefieldflux. Magnets can do free work, the balance gets even when you put in energy afterwards to separate the magnets.