Would like to Submit a PDF with regards to a Gravity Assisted Device

[GravityAntiGravity]

The GAGA 3 motor was designed on paper first using mathematical and physics formulas.  So the build follows the math and the electrical measuring instruments are confirmation that the math was correct.  The math is presented in the White Paper submitted to ResearchGate.com  under the author name Gerald Rowley, Improving the Mechanical Advantage of Simple Mechanical...

The build is 100% complete however, there is some room for performance improvement.  I will present a new video in the near future showing the operation of the GAGA 3 motor.  it still operates using the same methodologies found in the GAGA 1 and GAGA 2 models shown in early YouTube videos.  The GAGA 3 is much faster, produces more power, and is more compact using 5 blades instead of 3 blades. At this point in time it is 21% more efficient than the GAGA 2 Model.

[GravityAntiGravity]

Additional Photo of GAGA 3,

Side view

Designed by Physics,  Accelerated Angular Motion creates work and captured into power

[sm0ky2]

When looking at the math, there is a difference between the two forces.


Over time, this results in a net difference in work. Up vs down


Across a single cycle, this is not noticeable until you reach
very tall heights or very heavy masses


But cycle per cycle over time, there IS a difference.
what % of this we can harness depends on field orientation
and transitional regions, magnetic strength, etc.

[lota]

Hello
I think it's not that difficult to build. Is it better horizonta rotation or vertical?
Greeting
Lota

[sm0ky2]

The actuation (part where energy is generated), could be rotary or linear
this is more of a choice or convenience
Although rotary does make sense, from a power generation standpoint






the drive force comes from the difference between magnetic lift
and gravitational 'drop'
This takes place in the vertical domain. Magnets repelling upwards,
Gravity taking it back down and converting the gained potential energy
into kinetic energy


I have made attempts to swap out the permanent magnets for electromagnets
So far, the electric losses are greater than the gravitational gains.
(vertical solenoid type actuators)


With permanent magnets, there are just a few main aspects you need to worry about


1) the magnetic strength must be enough to lift the rotor
2) the arrangement must be such that you have a difference in magnetic field at both
the entrance (when the rotor enters the field) and the repulsion point.
basically you need less resistance entering the field than you get in repulsive force once inside it.


The latter being controlled by distance, angle of approach, or even choice of magnets
(ceramic ferrites have interesting applications in this area)
Shielding and field diversion techniques have also been employed to achieve this