General builder query

[sm0ky2]

Consider energy density, rather than raw power.


V / cm^3


The threshold is in the upper end of a 1-2million volt range
Depending on the conditions of your surroundings


The current is a matter of the draw on your transformer
needed to maintain the potential.
This will give you your total power requirements


Without doing the exact math, you're probably looking at
a 1-meter outer toroid minimum
Realistically upwards to 10-m
With a coil diameter of 0.3-1m respectively
Probably air-coil or a light ferrite, not your standard semiconductor ferrite
thick enamel coatings



And very close (but well insulated) spacing between the concentric rings


To do this sort of testing within a reasonable budget:
You will want several signal generators driving your HV circuit
to encompass a broad range of frequencies.
each one having its' own range that it can produce


There are industrial and scientific machines that can produce virtually every
possible manmade signal within our capabilities
(most are like i said above, packed in a fancy box)
that costs tens of thousands if not millions of $$


Once you can create the disturbance, study it and understand whats going on
Then you can learn how to create a 3rd larger toroid
(with 3,5,6,7,or 9 concentric toroidal fields)
to maintain a stable spacial reference to that Hamiltonian space
Thus connecting that one to the reference space, by using the outer toroid as a point of origin




May i ask why you want this information what you intend to do with it?

[DonEMitchell]

The JQSC space drive could be constructed using an electrostatic motor
by adding a rotating conductive cylinder on top
and connecting that to one polarity of the HV supply
the outer ring to the other

And in the patent Quincey describes how the core material has differing magnetization constants, which made for a snappier hysteresis.


My picture stuck in my mind on plausible stuff is that the toroidal fields with no polarity poking out (magnetic flux density with no polarity) is counterpoised to place strain on the matter lattice as a response to the system's non-Maxwellian features.


I.e., the imaginary axis of magnetic potentials was made to poke out.  Potential, not polarity.


Imaginary resonance, mathematically speaking.


When there's a regular poke on the matter lattice per oscillator cycle... then by scanning through the harmonic points (found by RF grid dip meter?  an RF bridge?) a peak could be found to lay the wattage into.


What we are looking for is an emergent field.  A field will construct.  The field is not a quantum field, but an anomalie acting in the aether to a different set of resonant rules. 


I thought the triangle with a hole in it very interesting... but it is described as a support structure.


DonEM


P.S.  I met a man scouting for a new team to produce antigravity effects.  The first team was successful, and the AG success broke up the team.  He said, "We have found a new axis in magnetism that nobody is looking for."

[sm0ky2]

Start with 2MV/cm^3


then worry about things like field shape or frequency
Density is the key

[DonEMitchell]

Awesome, Sm0ky2!  Sorry for the late response... didn't mean to... didn't click on the email links and that blocked your response where I could notice.  Tanx. 


Move below your quote following on A-vector (same as) Aharonov-Bohm equations that frame the same.

Consider energy density, rather than raw power.


V / cm^3


The threshold is in the upper end of a 1-2million volt range
Depending on the conditions of your surroundings


The current is a matter of the draw on your transformer
needed to maintain the potential.
This will give you your total power requirements


Without doing the exact math, you're probably looking at
a 1-meter outer toroid minimum
Realistically upwards to 10-m
With a coil diameter of 0.3-1m respectively
Probably air-coil or a light ferrite, not your standard semiconductor ferrite
thick enamel coatings



And very close (but well insulated) spacing between the concentric rings


To do this sort of testing within a reasonable budget:
You will want several signal generators driving your HV circuit
to encompass a broad range of frequencies.
each one having its' own range that it can produce


There are industrial and scientific machines that can produce virtually every
possible manmade signal within our capabilities
(most are like i said above, packed in a fancy box)
that costs tens of thousands if not millions of $$


Once you can create the disturbance, study it and understand whats going on
Then you can learn how to create a 3rd larger toroid
(with 3,5,6,7,or 9 concentric toroidal fields)
to maintain a stable spacial reference to that Hamiltonian space
Thus connecting that one to the reference space, by using the outer toroid as a point of origin

May i ask why you want this information what you intend to do with it?

I'm glad you ask... and thank you for the effort.


The toroidal flux ring to me is good to start just like you suggested... find an anomaly in the flux-system behavior, and hunt it down, tweak, balance... and amplify.


Since you wrote your response things fell together for me to better understand you and J. Q. St. Claire which ties in really smoothly with Frank Znidarsic's theory that the Coulomb field is exactly the field to couple into.


Electronics doesn't go there save for nuclear magnetic resonance (medical) which is NOT even where this goes.  NMR increased B-flux until a molecule magntically flips.  Then the un-flip when the pulse is over emits a radio frequency photon which is used to construct a image, with all the other pulse/flip/emit signals as the device simply mechanically raster-scans the patient's body through the magnetic hot spot.


[size=78%]----------------[/size]
Spoiler alert!!!


Nutshell quick-take under-view-of-the-chassis intended to host a standing mass wave which is the Coulombic-magnetic resonance standing in place on a donut with copper helices (torus knot times three -- 3-phase bifilar activation).


----------------


The whole theory of why a resonant copper array on a donut may work is based on the Znidarsic velocity, which is the speed a magnetic pulse will need to travel to be noticed by an atom's Coulomb field.  That's the positive field of the nuclear protons holding the electrons in their shells/orbits.  Z-velocity is ignored by every place Frank tried to get a peer review.  It's not Newtonian, in that it explains Planck's constant (sonically mediated by nuclear tensions).  Newton's photon (corpuscle of light) concept mathematically framed the quantum transistion as instantaneous, per Frank's paper.  Newton's instantaneous-time of quantum transition is the source, cause, and reason Planck's constant exists.  So Frank's a downright heretic.  Frank retired recently, and won't talk about his paper to me (but he would surely work for enough money).


The risk of failing is of no matter, just a retirement hobby here (with deep roots).


The failure risk is lessened by the reason I'm compelled this direction, which is disclosure from a friend having gone years without being able to share what he knew from military research into this certain focus.  They go in every direction they can imagine in the hunt for new weaponry (I'd reckon).


After he nearly died from a stroke, he recovered from a month of coma, and contacted me when strong enough to talk.  I spent ten days with him getting details on how to tickle the Coulomb field into a symphony that organized the aether into what forces one may.


This is a magnetic resonance technology.


The St. Claire wormhole concept you've laid open, Sm0ky2, seems like a great way to introduce the theory of nucleosonic coupling.


--------------------------------------------
Second alert!  Spoiler concept inbound!
--------------------------------------------


The sonic component of nucleosonic coupling is the gyration, or impulse-period, the mass-center of an atom feels/responds when a magnetic field changes at the proper speed to match the impulse profile.


Znidarsic lays out the algebra beginning with Schrodinger's equation.  Eng. Z. worked with NASA on Eugene Podkletnov duplication.  The velocity of flux-density travel is calculated like a wavefront on a dipole loop HAM antenna at resonance, calculated by distance 'traveled' on the loop.


When Z-velocity is established on a Coulomb field of an atom in a copper matter lattice of billions of trillions of electric Coulomb-bubbles wiggle. (The spherical electric positive nuclear charge.)


Maintain periodic wiggling of Coulomb's bubbles, and with tuning/tweaking, and a lot of attention paid to the shape of the field (like you suggest, Sm0kes) then one is theoretically in the set and setting to turn up the power.


I don't call the Z-machine a wormhole, whatever that may be.  I call it a dimple in time generator, in long form.  Or 'it.'


Because once the jiggle-velocity is tuned, and the resonator of RF optical quality lays coherent-loading into an emergent harmony, then we have alien tech on the workbench.  No big deal.  Easy, power transistor afforded. It's all in the tune on good shape technology.


This just scratches the surface of the explanations of it all that have fluttered into my attention space since the disclosure confused my brain in 2013.  The original project I think is narrowed down to the 1980-s based on the disclosure's age.


--------------
!!!Sm0ky2!!!
--------------
You wrote above, "Then you can learn how to create a 3rd larger toroid (with 3,5,6,7,or 9 concentric toroidal fields) to maintain a stable spacial reference to that Hamiltonian space"


That's fricken awesome stuff!  As your gentleman's demeanor may allow, I hope to take your brain apart!  Thanks for the easier terms.  My calculus has faded from 1973.  I'm really eager to learn a mathematical grip on this stuff. 


Thank you Sm0kyII !


---


I'm hanging out at home here at Catcliffe while they are tearing off my roof of our new fixer-upper while we live under it... so my workbench won't be coming online anytime soon.  But the lab's getting built first over the garage! 


If there's anyone wanting to jump in on a build I'm thrilled... I may not even build but advise as an amateur alien scientist.


I will be building a toroidal unit with the copper resonators all spec-d to powers of the golden ratio and expect something just because it's so mysterious.  That's why I'm a cargo-culter in my mind's closet.  My cargo though was found from extraordinary measures and people like the disclosure guy... who was a savant too deep to follow without lots of questions and an open mind. I thought he was just crazy for years until he opened up after recovery from coma.  He's gone now.




DonEM

[captainpecan]

Not sure if this would be the right thread to ask this, but I'm trying to lay out a generator build. And for some reason I'm kind of unsure about something. Maybe someone can answer a question for me...


Let's say you have a spinning rotor with magnets on it passing 2 types of coils. Both identical size but different wire size and weight. But both produce exactly 10 watts (for ease of understanding). Only difference is wire size. Let's ignore resistance of thinner wire issues and things like that. Just general info needed here.. But one produces 10 volts at 1 amp. The other produces 5 volts at 2 amps. Let's say they are hooked in parralel to a battery setting at 0 volts (for ease of understanding).


Now, if you hook them in parralel, does the charge battery get current from both like it would if the coils produced the same voltage and the current would double. Or does the higher voltage of 1 coil make the 2nd coil not have the potential to charge at all? For instance. Does the battery only see the 10 volt 1 amp pulse, or does it also see the 5 volt 2 amp pulse. Would the battery catch both pulses if pulsed exactly at the same time to recieve 20 watts. Or would it only see 10 watts from the 10 volt pulse?


The point is, wondering if it is a viable option for a generator to have both high voltage low amp coils as well as low voltage high amp coils. That way at very slow speeds, a battery would get enough voltage to at least catch a small charge from the high voltage coils. But as speeds increase, the high amperage coils reach a high enough voltage to start dumping higher amps into it as well. Or are we kind of stuck choosing one or another, or switching between coils dependant on speed of rotor.

Does that question make sense? Any thoughts? I'm hoping if both pulses are exactly in phase that the battery would see both and not just one. But I'm really not sure. Thanks for any responses.