Would like to Submit a PDF with regards to a Gravity Assisted Device

[GravityAntiGravity]

YouTube shows GAGA 1 and GAGA 2 with horizontal plane mounts.  GAGA 3 is a vertical mount setup.

[sm0ky2]

The principals are basically the same as in the Archer Quinn device
(which is 1 of 3 gravity assist machines i have seen working)

the difference being the use of Archimedean leverage in the latter.


We did the math on the gravity vs magnetism i believe in the early parts
of the Roll on June 20th thread.


I don't see why this shouldn't be possible in the arrangement presented here
except by friction of the mechanisms, or disproportional torque values, etc.

[sm0ky2]

Hello
I think it's not that difficult to build. Is it better horizonta rotation or vertical?
Greeting
Lota

"Better", i assume to mean more beneficial
(please correct me if im wrong)


If you were to choose a horizontal representation, you must look at this
in 2 dimensions.


One being the dimension of magnetic repulsion
the 'drive mechanism' activated by magnetic force


the second dimension is, again, the vertical
you see, magnetic fields are spherical.
If you utilize the vertical dimensions of the field
to do the "lifting", while conversely using the gravity
to do the 'pushing' in the magnetic frame of reference


The gravitational gains can be recognized in a plane
different from the vertical.


This is where leverage comes into play

[lota]

Hello
I did a setup. But it still takes time. With 20mm magnets it will not work. I think 30mm is better I have 70mm stroke and 50Kg flywheel mass.
Is with Translator. Sorry
Greeting
Lota

[GravityAntiGravity]

I would lower the flywheel mass until you get your blade balancing the weight of the lifting rod magnets mass.