Build 2

[Johnsmith]

 I'll be doing 2 other tests after I make another video. One is testing 8 weights with 2 being
lifted and the other would be having weights roll towards the axle. With the 2nd one, it'd be
seeing how well just having the weight at the bottom and to the right of the axle on the
wheel. This gets into f = ma. And to explain that, I'd need to show how that allows for more
or quicker acceleration.

Actually an Mt 1 type (not loose balls rolling around the wheel) with the retraction disc might work. I'll need to add a rim to try it. Then I could remove the braces between arms. Once the weight going up the left side rolls to the axle, the net overbalance will increase. This is where using a spring could shoot the weight out away from the axle.
8 weight wheels lifting the top weights won't gain anything. Bessler did build a lot of wheels so he probably used a process of elimination. I do have my own design to finish designing as well. And if that gets built first, that's okay because I do have my own situation to resolve. And with Bessler, to redo it will take time.

[Johnsmith]

 With an iteration of Mt 1, in the attached image, the weight is closer to the hub. This would combine
Mt 1 with weights move towards and away from the axle while Bessler used a drum to lift weights. As
I know, a weight moving in on the left side is the same as a weight being lifted on the right side. And
in math, the inverse is always true. What is meant by this is that when the weight on the left moves
towards the axle, it increases net torque. When a weight is lifted, it increases net torque as well.
One reduces resistance by about 1/2 while the other increases work by about 1/2. And with Occam's
Razor, the simpler idea should've been tried first. It'll be easy enough for me to mount 2 weights close
to the hub and it will most likely rotate 90°. What would need to be seen is the weight on the left
rolling in while the wheel rotates. That would mean removing the braces in its way and adding 2
temporary braces on the outside of the wheel. And if that works well then that would most likely be
what Bessler did.
And with using springs, they would exert the same force as the mass of the weight. If the wheel
rotates well enough, then torque from the wheel could slowly increase the compression of the spring.
Then when released, the weight wheel could quickly move outward. The first iteration of this is
after verifying by testing would be to modify the frame for this.
But I'll be focusing on the design work for the water wheel. Then I'll be able to start looking for someone
to build it for me. I need surgery and the water wheel would buy me time for building the last iteration
of what I've been building if I need the time.

p.s., I just did a very basic test and the acceleration was amazing. And I know people won't believe me
and that's okay. This will also create a slight problem. The screw the retraction line attaches to can't fit
between the discs. A "toggle" type mechanism can be built. And I might make the modification necessary
to do an actual test. I will because then I'd know once and for all if it can work. Then the question becomes
make it known or wait until I have a working wheel?
Thanks to my new "toy" (an oscillating cutting/sanding tool) I'll be able to clean out the inside of the arms.
Then I could extend the tracks for the weight wheels along the entire length of the arm. Then that would
leave routing a rim for the outside of the wheel. Still, I need to make a video showing lifting weights doesn't
work but suggests that a weight rolling in might. This is simply because a weight can roll in in less than
22.5° of rotation and this decreases the force necessary to rotate the wheel according to f = ma. Lifting a
weight actually increases the amount of force needed to rotate the wheel.

[Johnsmith]

 This is how it works. With this, it would make 4 knocking sounds per revolution.
The only reason it stops rotating is because the lines that retract the weight wheel
stop it from continuing on.
And with 4 weight wheels and 90+ degrees of rotation, what would allow for
something to work. And with a female wood worker that I am acquainted with, she
can build the water wheel. I want to do a show in Utrecht, Netherlands. And what she
builds could be a part of that show. Then girls could say that a woman can do more
than cook, clean and make babies when she becomes a young woman.
From my perspective, because of tests that I did years ago I was looking for the
missing momentum and found it. With that said, how to build it? That part is often
overlooked. I will be editing that video a little for what I publish on my YouTube channel. In
that video I will add text that states that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics as well
as Newton's Laws of Motion allow for conservation of energy. And a machine powered by
gravity is a perpetual motion machine.
The technical argument is that gravity has no energy so it cannot be conserved. Gravity
is a force yet f = ma does not apply because NOTHING creates a gravitational field. I also
am well versed in physics because of my interest in atmospheric chemistry and physics.
Basically what allows for gravity also allows for Coulomb's Law; 
https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-3/Coulomb-s-Law

My video; https://youtu.be/obOjcxhmIcs

p.s., @Tarsier79, why not show this video in Bessler's wheel?

The 2 links to Eddie and the Cruisers clips kind of show what happens when 2 things work together.

p.s., I am aware that witnesses said that 8 knocking sounds per revolution were heard. And it might
require 8 weight wheels. And it's possible that because of better bearings and lubricants today that
only 4 weight wheels would be needed.

[Johnsmith]

 WhaT HELPED TO MAKE bRUCE sPRINGSTEEN FAMOUS; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgIsyoxZ7Uw

[Johnsmith]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxrz00XSOAo