Hmmm, Can A Hydrogen Fuel Cell and Generator Be Enhanced?

[Johnsmith]

 This is just for fun but with something like Cesium 235, it's Beta decay is radioactive 2/4He. 2 protons and 4 nuclei (2 protons and 2 neutrons). When that happens Cesium 235 becomes 231.
And for what you suggested kolbacict, it has to do with how many electrons are in its shell. And when CO2 is +/-1 electron, it is either negatively or positively charged.
And if a field (pure) of CO2 has either 1 extra or one less electron, it is ionized while the field is neutral.
This is what Maxwell's Demon was about. And if a field (volume) of CO2 can generate the missing electrons then a natural supply would be realized for hydrogen generation.
http://webhome.auburn.edu/~smith01/notes/maxdem.htm

This might actually be something worthwhile when it comes to free energy. A natural process for generating electrons might be cheaper than what a generator allows for.
Think solar panels on steroids.
And then there is always; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUAL1RBIBtI

[kolbacict]

No, no radiation !
Only electrical filds.

[Johnsmith]

No, no radiation !
Only electrical filds.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvV3nn_de2k

p.s., CO2 might be the solution to improved hydrogen generation. 😀

[kolbacict]

My fellow chemists say that even good dielectrics like carbon dioxide do not break down into their constituent elements when subjected to an electric field. The field can pull an electron away from a molecule. A series of all sorts of free radical transformations will begin. The result will be various substances, but not much. such as CO, C2O,C3O2 a bit O2, and C.
But we will not achieve the desired result.
Not to mention water...

[Johnsmith]

My fellow chemists say that even good dielectrics like carbon dioxide do not break down into their constituent elements when subjected to an electric field. The field can pull an electron away from a molecule. A series of all sorts of free radical transformations will begin. The result will be various substances, but not much. such as CO, C2O,C3O2 a bit O2, and C.
But we will not achieve the desired result.
Not to mention water...

  With some research that I am pursuing, it will involve CO2. When you posted about Stanley Meyer, I didn't check out any other threads
when I started this one. Yet when you mentioned hydrogen sulfide and CO2, I know what H3O is. And then I found out that in a container
of what might be pure CO2, it becomes both positively and negatively ionized. And they can be separated as such.
What will need to be known if negatively ionized CO2 can generate electrons from background electromagnetic radiation. If it does that,
then a source of electrons might be realized. This would allow for a natural source to augment green energy (wind or solar power).