Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

That's where a complete analysis of the device and it's claims, using a professional Computer Assisted
Engineering (CAE) numerics software, can be handy.

Plus, after the excercise you will be quite familiar with the theory involved, how it operates and how it
may be improved upon, fabricated and tested.

Just throwing stuff together on the bench based on a few calculations and assumptions, then crossing
your fingers hoping it might work can be expensive and time consuming; but hey, you might be the first
to get lucky and end up with something that works perfect in your first pass.

However, we haven't seen very much of that yet. Some of this stuff appears simple on it's face, dig a little
deeper, and you find that it's not. You might even know a piece or two of it real well, but when it's all
integrated it can become complicated and tricky real fast! As we all know and likely have experienced.

Just my humble opinion - and the way I've done things for years - professionally - a prototype never gets
build until, and unless, it can be understood well enough to at least prove it on paper first (pass a complete
CAE analysis and 'pseudo peer' review). 

Anyway - Merry Christmas everyone and Happy Holidays!

SL

However; a complete detailed engineeering analysis and discussion does have risks - I know from at
least two experiences of trying to present some analysis and viable theoretical information on the
"Kapanzdze - Ruslan" device on the Forums.

Came close to another de-railment a third time involving this Holcomb (LinGen) device. Recall
Ruslan had many demonstration videos for backup but that didn't seem to matter. Thank goodness
this last time Holcomb had also published a variety of excellent patents and had a web site - but, 
even so, there is still a lot of unfounded flack and push-back...

So - take heed - it's a tough game in a rough arena!

Happy New Year and All the Best for 2023!

[rakarskiy]

I don't believe Holcomb's team doesn't know the full details of how his device works. What physicists cannot explain has been used in engineering for more than 150 years, from the very moment when the Gramme generator was replaced by a slotted core generator.
Merry Christmas everyone. I even put engineering sense here. "Korochun" is over, this is the longest night, the growth of light (day) will begin on the 25th, this is a new circle of our earth around our star. All good holidays.

[rakarskiy]

And so do I, Onepower (referring to bolded out above sentence) therefore, agree 100%.

However, the fact that HES is working with a tech that maybe (more likely) he does not even have the sligthtest idea how it really works...that does not mean that we all should abide based on his "theory" to explain why the phenomena takes place.

Ever since Figuera, we have read from their inventors very vague and sometimes unbelievable "theories" as trying to explain (in their Patents) how their devices do whatever they do...however, history has proven their "theories" were dead wrong...otherwise, we all should have, by now, All kind of Free Energies, Overunity and the works!!

Cheers

Ufopolitics

Good health to you!

The problem is that the principle that the Holcomb machine uses is used in any mechanical slotted synchronous power generator.
The two main principles are the excitation of the magnetic flux and its rotation in the stator core.
The most interesting thing is that physics cannot explain the operation of this generator, as well as the operation of the transformer itself.
I've done enough experiments so that all the same "altruian rake in the forehead" led to understanding. And I cannot explain how the EMF is induced in the conductor, but this does not mean that the EMF is not induced there with the appropriate combination of the device.
By the way, your design with a static rotor can also be corrected. Believe me, it's not difficult.

Sincerely. Happy holidays.

[SolarLab]

Hi SL,

Too bad the animated gifs won't work here. 

In my experience, core remanence due to hysteresis will appear only if there are no gaps in the core material.  Once a gap of a certain magnitude is introduced, the magnitude of remanence will decrease.  There are obvious gaps in the Holcomb magnetic structure so I wonder if remanence will have much of an effect here.

Regards,
Pm

Hi Partzman,

Finally got a few minutes to review your posts - hope your right about remanence not appearing due to the air gap.
(I was chalking it up to flux weakening thus increasing the saturation level ?)
But just maybe that's what the simulation (the gif that wouldn't post) is trying to tell me - interesting. Thanks for the info.

For those interested,

Here is a simulation of a moving magnetic unipole across a four pole rotor.  This is done at very high efficiency with only minimal losses due to the current shuttling between the inductors via capacitors.  The bucking sequential switching between the coils produces the nearly constant unipolar field at the core ends.  L1 starts with a current bias of 500ma at t=0us and ends with ~490ma at t=40us.

Regards,
Pm

Also interesting is your simulation of the four "moving magnetic unipoles." Had to study that one a bit, but again interesting
to say the least. Thanks.

Have a Really Great Christmas!

SL

[SolarLab]

 Merry Christmas Rakarskiy UFO AC Bi Partzman Kolbacict and Everyone!

Got a real good feelin about the New Year...