Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

I don't know. Maybe there is somewhere. I do not consider myself a great connoisseur of electric motors. Just if it is possible in a parametric transformer, why not in a cylindrical "motor".
I just turned a steel ball in a three-phase stator at low frequencies, below 50 Hz.
The ball is really spinning. Another way to observe a rotating field.

I found this in my photo file. See if it plays for you.
bi

[onepower]

rakarskiy

I made an explanatory picture for the circuit where the capacitor is discharged to the load. Consider this my theory, because in principle I explain the process in this way, and this is my concept, unlike the official one. The official one does not suit me, since I do not consider the movement of charged parts in the form of negatively charged electrons to be a reason for the current system. From my point of view, the movement of electrons is the nonsense of official science. I am a supporter of the field (plasma) concept.

The electron flow model and notation works so long as we understand every force is a dual force. The (-) terminal repels the free electrons as the (+) terminal attracts them, equal and opposite. Nature is not one sided and is always a duality of forces, equal and opposite.

As well, in my opinion, you did not include the most important notation which is energy flow. The energy flows from both the (-) and (+) terminals towards the load. It's amazing that most people have no idea how energy flow even works in a basic circuit.

For example, in your circuit diagram the energy in the circuit is due to the simultaneous (-)repulsion and (+) attraction forces on the free electrons in the conductor. The energy flow is due to the fact the electrons are concentrated at the (-) terminal, disperse/expand within the load, then keep expanding as they approach the (+) terminal. It's similar to a heat pump, a gas is compressed, the gas expands doing work and is then pulled back into the compressor. In our circuit the working gas is a fog of free electrons moving within a conductor.

If you think it's not an issue then try asking anyone where the energy flow is in a basic circuit. Here 99% fail and most of the electrical engineers I know couldn't even give me a coherent answer. As I like to say, we don't have an energy crisis we have an understanding crisis concerning what energy is and how it works.

AC

[rakarskiy]

onepower, vopros: did you read the material from the links? google translator works.

I do not adhere to the electronic theory of electricity. But how electric forces work in a circuit, I know enough to design. In any case, my latest research and experiments put a lot in place.
After that, I don't need to convince myself of electronic theory, where electrons can be measured in kg, it's an empty idea.
With respect.

[onepower]

rakarskiy

onepower, vopros: did you read the material from the links? google translator works.

Yes I did and as usual I disagree with the methodology. I disagree with people using math and equations to pretend there proving something because we could literally prove pigs could fly. It means nothing and it's backwards in my opinion.

I prove individual effects by experiment then combine said experimental effects into a demonstrable concept or device. So this notion of a bunch of scribbling on paper to supposedly represent something tangible yet to be proven means little. We have all seen the song and dance before and at the end of the day it never pans out.

As well, Holcomb is the only real inventor with demonstrable technology present and he claimed the excess energy was due to "Electron spins" in the iron cores of the device. If the actual inventor, Holcomb, is using electron flow notation then I would be more inclined to believe his theories than yours.

On your links, you are aware it's littered with completely ridiculous advertisements don't you?. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when your amateur webpage is showing half naked fat ladies with guns and how to save your toenails from fungus?. Is this a joke because it looks like a joke?.

AC

[Ufopolitics]

I prove individual effects by experiment then combine said experimental effects into a demonstrable concept or device. So this notion of a bunch of scribbling on paper to supposedly represent something tangible yet to be proven means little. We have all seen the song and dance before and at the end of the day it never pans out.

As well, Holcomb is the only real inventor with demonstrable technology present and he claimed the excess energy was due to "Electron spins" in the iron cores of the device. If the actual inventor, Holcomb, is using electron flow notation then I would be more inclined to believe his theories than yours.

AC

And so do I, Onepower (referring to bolded out above sentence) therefore, agree 100%.

However, the fact that HES is working with a tech that maybe (more likely) he does not even have the sligthtest idea how it really works...that does not mean that we all should abide based on his "theory" to explain why the phenomena takes place.

Ever since Figuera, we have read from their inventors very vague and sometimes unbelievable "theories" as trying to explain (in their Patents) how their devices do whatever they do...however, history has proven their "theories" were dead wrong...otherwise, we all should have, by now, All kind of Free Energies, Overunity and the works!!

Cheers

Ufopolitics