Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

rakarskiy

UFOpolitics, congratulations!

I may also have good news. Now it's like I don't even know what to say.
If everything is confirmed experimentally, I will probably add (or rather write down) Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction.
It lacks the whirlwind action content. I wrote this method for myself to understand the ongoing processes.
Having superimposed on the devices of Holcomb and Figuere, everything just became at an understandable level.
There are slight delays in experiments, damn war, I love logic anyway!
You are all close to trample, but not in essence. I myself was like that, I just did altruism on a rake.
By the way, the simplicity that has been opened does not mean that you can simply put the generator into operation.
Study in more detail the excitation of the working field in a synchronous generator.

Congratulations again!

All with the approaching calendar new year, astrological has already arrived!




listener192

Quote from: Ufopolitics on December 29, 2022, 12:24:48 PM
It is exactly the same system principle, the same principle as Pierre Cotnoir, the same system as Clemente Figuera back in  1902-1908 Patent...etc,etc,etc...
It is all about Moving just the Magnetic Field, not the Coils, not the Steel Cores whether it be an Outer or Inner "Field Rotor".
As it don't matter if we rotate or displace the Field linearly or in a circle...or in ANY other geometrically possible imaginable shape or form...even Elliptical, or square, pentagon...the Field would still make any complicated radical turn, and very fast, whether in 2D or 3D...without the need of any "bearings".

Point here, it's been done before...way back to 1902 - 1908...

I have also Threads on Energetic Forum that date back as far as 2016...and before.

On a separate note...yes there are thousands of Threads here...however, I know perfectly well (as I know many here) how to disguise/filter what is good and what is plain BS...

Sorry but am too busy now...so, please, let's kill it here. Thks

Ufopolitics


Ufopolitics,


I have not seen one replicated example of Clemente Figueras work that demonstrates an efficiency over 100%.


With regards to the DZ, I have replicated that work extensively and posted the results on this forum. Far too much energy is wasted as heat in stator windings that have no flux coupling to the rotor.
Pierre's geometry can never produce the results he shows in his videos and is a fake for sure. Also supported by the fact he went on to a completely different geometry after the original device burnt up, which also failed. If he truely had a working device he would have rebuilt it and performed instrumented tests.


From my experience with the DZ and modeling with FEMM, I would speculate that a standard three phase stator and a DC switched 16 salient pole rotor will produce good induction (at normal line voltages) in the stator windings, although a switched sequence of four salient poles per pole would not produce the highest phase power (for a given load). The highest phase power would be achieved by having three salient poles ON per pole and then rotating that arrangement. 


However, I cannot see how rotating poles by either means, changes the flux coupling that will occur between rotor and stator, which will ensure the load on the stator windings is seen fully by the switched rotor DC power supply.


L192


rakarskiy

Quote from: listener192 on December 30, 2022, 05:48:20 AM
However, I cannot see how rotating poles by either means, changes the flux coupling that will occur between rotor and stator, which will ensure the load on the stator windings is seen fully by the switched rotor DC power supply.
L192

Good time!
A counter question, how does an electromagnetic moment arise in a traditional synchronous generator, with the phase wires laid in the stator groove?
It occurs when a current occurs in the stator winding. EMF in the phase also occurs at idle. Thus the phase field under load, enhances the excitation field.
I gave an interesting slide (before) for the methodology for calculating the EMF of a synchronous generator with laying in a groove, but it does not completely coincide with reality. This is for general educational concepts, as it turned out, it has nothing to do with a design engineer.
Sincerely.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg572484/#msg572484
 

listener192

Hi  Rakarskiy,


The stator phase(s) on load are monitored by the AVR which increases or decreases excitation to maintain phase line voltage...so, not sure of the point you are wanting to make?


Was it that the AVR can take its power directly from the stator winding, as per an AC self excited generator?


self excited ac alternator diagram stamford



L192

Ufopolitics

Quote from: listener192 on December 30, 2022, 05:48:20 AM
Ufopolitics,
I have not seen one replicated example of Clemente Figueras work that demonstrates an efficiency over 100%.
Of course not...otherwise we all would have the key to FE and OU by now...

Quote from: listener192 on December 30, 2022, 05:48:20 AM
With regards to the DZ, I have replicated that work extensively and posted the results on this forum. Far too much energy is wasted as heat in stator windings that have no flux coupling to the rotor.
Pierre's geometry can never produce the results he shows in his videos and is a fake for sure. Also supported by the fact he went on to a completely different geometry after the original device burnt up, which also failed. If he truely had a working device he would have rebuilt it and performed instrumented tests.
I have seen your work and it is impressive, a lot of effort!!, however, as many others, that are tight up to the classic magnetic field theories, dedicated more time to the Arduino Program, to the switching boards circuit, and very little about trying to see your magnetic field rotating, measuring field strenght, etc,etc.
Pierre Cotnoir knowledge about magnetism is very limited, as He admit it himself on that Thread, IMO He hit the jackpot without knowing how he did it...and then after burning first setup, he totally lost all original and working device essence to make it work.
Where have you seen Pierre's new configuration, after He burnt first DZ Generator?
Could you provide a link?...thks

Quote from: listener192 on December 30, 2022, 05:48:20 AM
From my experience with the DZ and modeling with FEMM, I would speculate that a standard three phase stator and a DC switched 16 salient pole rotor will produce good induction (at normal line voltages) in the stator windings, although a switched sequence of four salient poles per pole would not produce the highest phase power (for a given load). The highest phase power would be achieved by having three salient poles ON per pole and then rotating that arrangement.
However, I cannot see how rotating poles by either means, changes the flux coupling that will occur between rotor and stator, which will ensure the load on the stator windings is seen fully by the switched rotor DC power supply.
L192

Of course, it is mentioned by Pierre on his posts, the more you brake down the main field pole(s), the HIGHER RESOLUTION you will get.
That is why HES uses multiple single coils on his Solid State Rotor for the standing alone units.
What I have learned over the years working on these systems, is that collapsing the field, at any point in time, will kill your output currents. So, you MUST ALWAYS keep a higher portion of the Field "alive" during transitions/translations of the field.
Second, the "amount of Field alive" should match up your Stator Coils width.
These Systems work as MECHANICAL GEARS, Your Rotor have gears, as well as your stator...and so, if the salient tooth of both gears, do not align between them, or are too separated, to the point of not binding properly...then output would be very poor if any.
As many details come up as well, like spacing between gears tooth, sync timing, pressures at rotation, etc,etc.
An Electronic Rotating Field is very fast and very subtle, faster than a rotating steel mass attached to the field, so if it is not ENGAGED properly, having in mind all attributes I have mentioned above, once you accelerate exciting Field, gears will start slipping off their tracks with Stator communication...and no powerful output would be obtained.
When I saw Pierre Cotnoir on one of his videos, get a piece of paper on top of generator assembly and dump some steel shavings...I got highly disappointed.
There are very new advanced methods to see the real magnetic field in movement, more clearly than loose, randomly spread steel dirt.
The Magnetic Viewing Film is one of them...just to cite the simplest and less expensive one.

Ufopolitics
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind:Study the science of art. Study the art of science.
Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.
―Leonardo da Vinci