Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[onepower]

It's also important to note that to my knowledge no credible FE device ever used lap windings as is found in almost all motor/generators today.

In this respect the devil is always in the details and most fail to produce the desired result because they have not reproduced the concept and layout claimed by the inventor. This is what many inventors claim to be "the spirit" of the invention relating to the effects, procedure and physical geometry/layout.

This may help, in any given patent I do not look for what is common to other technologies but what is different. How does the details and explanation of the device in question deviate from common practice?. Understand that we often have a picture in our head, a natural bias, based on our own experience which betrays us at every turn. We want to believe we understand what's going on but in fact we don't. Thus our premise should always relate to seeking new understanding and learning. Something new to us...

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." ― Mark Twain

As we can see from the Holcomb patents and countless others which came before it there may be groups of coils but they are generally always switched sequentially, independently for a very good reason. My first experience with an experiment gone terribly wrong, but in a good way, was when I tried to explode the Hubbard patent. Not literally explode it but geometrically, I reduced the circular form of primary/secondary coils into a linear series of transformations similar to what Holcomb claims. In fact it still works and it doesn't need to be circular in form so long as the concept/process remains. In this respect I seem to keep proving myself wrong for reasons even I cannot understand, ergo learning something new.

So it seems to me many are barking up the wrong tree. 

If anyone is going to bother trying to replicate anything then it must be in the spirit of the invention. So when someone diverges from the intent, procedure, sequence, layout and geometry of the claim it will generally always fall short. It's never easy, nothing worth doing ever is so it's worth making an effort to do it right.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a complete screw up but as they say ... every dog has it's day.

Regards
AC

[rakarskiy]

one power,
I want to note that you need to master the principle, and not blindly repeat the design from the patent. Dr. Holcomb dealt with magnetic fields in medicine. Devices in medicine generate fields within 1.5 Tesla. By the way, a static generator is easy to calculate. The whole problem is still in hardware solutions without complex software bindings. Vyge I gave a link to the guy who built a similar design. He neglected the main Ohm's Law for magnetic circuits, and engineering techniques for designing generators. Notice not motors, but generators. I can say with confidence that this is a big gap for many to correctly calculate the generator circuit.

[kolbacict]

The problem relates to a lack of true field rotation because the magnetic field is a property of space separate from the source.

Therefore, we will never create it?  True rotating magnetic field?
There were guys ten years ago who experimented with the Marco Rodin's coil.
They clearly stated that there was an OU.
There, too, it seems there was a rotating toroidal field?
I made such a coil, for me it did not show any differences from a conventional inductor.
True, the geometry was poorly observed there.

[Ufopolitics]

It's also important to note that to my knowledge no credible FE device ever used lap windings as is found in almost all motor/generators today.

Yes, you are very right AC...

The overlapping or lap winding is used to "save room", or to fit more wires per square area (referring to motors) and for generator coils it is overlapped to reach a higher number of conductors to be induced by the rotary sweeping inductor area.

Actually, did you ALL know that the only wires that are Induced on any Two Part Rotary Generator, even the stationary rotor type, we are working on...
that only the Vertical wires are Induced?!

Yes, and I am referring to the Vertical wires in ALL Coils on the Stator, the ones parallel to the shaft, whether a real shaft or an imaginary one?

All the Horizontal, or diametrical wires in the coils are just there serving as "connectors"...but no induction is generated?

This fact sets all these machines, automatically, at 50% Induction Efficiency!!

Now, it is impossible to build a machine (from the mechanical Engineering point) where the Induction coils or Exciter circuit, travels within a "fully closed tunnel" where all the Induced coils are wound...a completely closed tunnel...where the Stator Output Coils would be on the outside...

How can you rotate "physically" an inner set of coils and their steel cores, that could travel within another hollow, but fully closed structure?

However, that would be the "perfect generator", a 100% efficient from the Induction percentage area calculation point of view...

The only way that this type of generator could be conceived, is by rotating a Virtual Magnetic Field, not physically, not including its coils and cores...

And the only "Geometry" which can give Us such characteristics is a Toroid...

And then, we would not need to do "lap windings", or overlap the coils, none of them...just to be continuously set, one after the other...in a full closed circular arrangement...


Can You guys "imagine" that?


And then, set it to work in your minds?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

I was asked a question in a personal, I think my answer and comparison will be very interesting.

Holcomb has a patent for a solid state electromagnetic rotor for power generation.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7d/d1/d7/018fe4892a4d9e/US20190238011A1.pdf
Photo of the founders and the basis of the invention of the solid-state rotor.
https://holcombenergysystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Robert-and-Ellen.jpg


Listening to tales of spinning electrons is for media losers.

Take a conventional synchronous mechanical generator with electromagnetic excitation. Consider only the input excitation power and also the output power of a generator phase, such as a car. The maximum costs for excitation of the rotor electromagnet are: 5 Amperes * 12 Volts = 60 watts. Maximum phase power 1.5 kW. It remains only to solve the problem of a solid-state electromagnet that simulates the rotation of the field from the electromagnet. Let's say all this will take us 200 watts of power. The result of the COP will be 1.5/0.2=7.5. What is the conversion ratio without taking into account the mechanical force in a traditional generator, you can calculate yourself.
I hope I explained clearly. What is the magnetic permeability of electrical steel, and how it enhances the magnetic field, I gave an example in one of my posts in this thread.  https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg566511/#msg566511

The magnetic circuit, it is in its correct calculation that the secret of the entire project lies.

Sincerely yours, Rakarsky