Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Lunkster]

Hi Everyone,

I am trying to get a better understanding of how the Holcomb generator can have a gain in the output coil when
the generator looks more like a transformer in its basic components.

The 16 sets of stator1, output coils, and stator 2 coils are intended to produce the 3 phase output signal
that is used in the industry today.  I get that.  So I believe that the OU should be able to
be demonstrated with one single set of Stator 1, output coil and stator 2 coils in the generator design.


Does the air gap between the stators and the output coil have a critical function in producing OU
in Holcomb's generator design.  A permanent magnet has the same flux going into the magnet as the flux
leaving the magnet.   In the same way, the flux entering the drive coil is the same as the flux leaving the
drive coil.  Now since the output coil is wound tightly on the same core as the drive core, then the flux
entering and leaving the output coil has to be the same as the drive coil.  What happens to the output
coil when we put an air gap between the top and bottom of the output coil.  It will now allow another
flux path to occur through the output coil besides the drive coil flux.

With this air gap, will the drive coil flux flow through the output coil producing both an electrical current
and creating an magnet in the core of the output coil?  At this point power is being generated in the
output coil.  If the core is being changed into a magnet during this process, it then may generate even
electrical power in the output coil because the air gap provides an additional path for the additional flux
to flow in addition to the drive coils flux.

The power to the drive coil is now turned off.
The output coil's core is magnetized.  But it is decreasing in its strength.  It is this change in the
amount of flux flowing in the output coil that is generating electrical power in the generator
at this time.  So there is now power in the drive coil and the output coil is generating electrical energy
at this time.  The air gap is providing the path for this flux to flow.  It is not locked in a transformer core.

You have power in a pulse that is spent in a short duty cycle of the generators operation.
You have power generation in the output coil in a longer duty cycle while the core of the
output coil is turned into a magnet and then relaxes again all awhile the output coil is
generating electrical energy.

Now setting up an testing this simple configuration should be easy for someone to do.
If this works, then the 16 sets of stator1, output coil and stator 2's should work as well.

I would try to set up the experiment with a small flux bias in the primary coil as
I have already shared ideas in this thread on how to do it.

For those like me how like a sketch of what I have said, download the attached file.
The drawing shows one drive coil and one output coil because I think the Holcomb
generator can be reduced to this kind of a design configuration.

I hope I here from you about my idea's about this.  I have had some good
thoughts in the past along with a lot of bad ones.  So keep that in mind!

Lunkster

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Everyone,

I am trying to get a better understanding of how the Holcomb generator can have a gain in the output coil when
the generator looks more like a transformer in its basic components.

The 16 sets of stator1, output coils, and stator 2 coils are intended to produce the 3 phase output signal
that is used in the industry today.  I get that.  So I believe that the OU should be able to
be demonstrated with one single set of Stator 1, output coil and stator 2 coils in the generator design.


Lunkster

Hello Lunkster,

If you are trying to understand this device, then leave aside all "conventional knowledge" about transformers...
This is NOT a "Typical" transformer...
Conventional Generators would -some how- help you better to understand how these devices work...well, sort of.

First, think of a Single Phase one...simple first.

Then Your mind set, would first need to "see" a Magnetic Field spinning within a Two Part Rotary Generator...forget about the coils and rotors spinning...just the magnetic field...and how it influences the Induction on the Stators...

Only then you would be ready to start thinking about these devices.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

Lunkster, you make the same mistake as the replicators of Figuer's idea.
The winding must be in a gap (groove) inside the core
Let me remind you once again the evolution of Figuer's replicators' error as the gap between the magnets turned into a coil on the core.

WATCH SLIDE

[Ufopolitics]

Lunkster, you make the same mistake as the replicators of Figuer's idea.
The winding must be in a gap (groove) inside the core
Let me remind you once again the evolution of Figuer's replicators' error as the gap between the magnets turned into a coil on the core.

WATCH SLIDE

@Rakarkiy,

Please, let me ask you a simple question...Have You replicated Figuera's Generator Successfully?

If so, could You please show your videos where you are doing it successfully?...showing it self powering itself?

Because I DO have tried myself to replicate Figuera's Device, many, many ways, for a very long time, all possibilities...

and I DO have the proof, for years...in You Tube Videos...

The winding must be in a gap (groove) inside the core...

Your assumption, will not make any difference, Rakarskiy...

if that would be the "secret" to a "successful" Figuera..., then show it working!!


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The Phrase of the day...

...It is "so easy" to write here, showing to be an "Authority" on any given subject...
But, without any, absolutely any proof...

Anyone could do that...I mean, literally anyone.

I could also make very complicated graphics...and beautifully elaborated...Plus Animated...

which will mean ABSOLUTELY "nada", nothing, without THE REAL PROOF


Ufopolitics