Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[pmgr]

Can we please be nice to each other....


@Ufopolitics
Yes, there are mistakes in his patents. I have found several in the ones I have gone through. I have gone through tons of patents in my career and that's just the way it is. No matter how often you proofread, you overlook things. On top of that, whoever reviews patents is supposed to fully understand them, but my experience is, most of the time they don't. In most cases only the claims are thoroughly examined and research is done to other inventions in the area to see if anyone else has claimed something like it.


@r2fpl
Whatever happened with Pierre and DZ2? How come he never went back to rebuilding his original DZ generator? It was the only working prototype.

[Ufopolitics]

Can we please be nice to each other....

Hello PmgR,


But I was being nice to r2-d2 !, oops, sorry!!, meant to r2fpl !

@Ufopolitics
Yes, there are mistakes in his patents. I have found several in the ones I have gone through. I have gone through tons of patents in my career and that's just the way it is. No matter how often you proofread, you overlook things. On top of that, whoever reviews patents is supposed to fully understand them, but my experience is, most of the time they don't. In most cases only the claims are thoroughly examined and research is done to other inventions in the area to see if anyone else has claimed something like it.

I know that PmgR,


I was just pointing out the errors...but basically analyzing coils setup geometrically...versus chanels.

@r2fpl
Whatever happened with Pierre and DZ2? How come he never went back to rebuilding his original DZ generator? It was the only working prototype.

I already asked him for the "secrets"...but nothing yet...




Cheers




Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hello Ufo, &/or anyone,
In that circular wiring diagram, Fig. 22, posted above, how many of the eight channels are energizing coils at any instant? I realize the 8 channels are sequenced as to cause 2 poles to migrate around the core and assume each pole consists of, or spans, multiple teeth & coils, right? Just trying to get a handle on how it is accomplished

I also assume each channel is simply switched at rotation frequency and not modulated. Is that right?

Thanks.
bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hello Ufo, &/or anyone,
In that circular wiring diagram, Fig. 22, posted above, how many of the eight channels are energizing coils at any instant?

All eight channels are on all the time during operation.

I realize the 8 channels are sequenced as to cause 2 poles to migrate around the core and assume each pole consists of, or spans, multiple teeth & coils, right? Just trying to get a handle on how it is accomplished

The best way is to watch this video starting at 0.45 to see animation, which is also based on the same config. or 16 poles rotor and 4 magnetic poles

I also assume each channel is simply switched at rotation frequency and not modulated. Is that right?

Thanks.
bi

When you see video animation, you would see the answer.


But, yes, in this case of four groups conforming four poles, NSNS, configured each 2 group (NS) by Pairs of coils apart by 180º...What channels do is to reverse polarity, by reversing voltage through an H Bridge of MOSFET's....where the excitation to base is operated by the PLC...or microprocesor.


The point is simple, start> all coils ON, then only two pairs, remember one pair is across two groups NS, (one per group, one NS, other SN) start to reverse polarity, passing to the next group and so on...until a full group has changed its polarity and so all the rest...


Group1= N1N2N3N4 >S-1 G2=S1S2S3S4>N-1 G3=N1N2N3N4>S-1G4=S1S2S3S4>N-1
Where G1 N4 will reverse Adding to G2 S-1, while G2 reverses S4 adding to G3 N-1...and so on...
Edit 1: I changed S0 for S-1 not to confuse NO or SO...




Hey, I got a question for you,


What is the advantage, for this scenario to reverse coils polarity in series versus in a parallel connection, like it is connected in FIG 22?


I forgot, but I think in inductance is opposite to resistors in series or parallel...related to V & A...




Cheers




Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Thanks Ufo,
Multiple component inductance combine like resistors in series and parallel connection. Capacitors are opposite.
About advantage, series vs parallel, for coils, maintaining the same mmf for each coil, you'd have to adjust turn count and wire size, then the result would be the same, no advantage to the series or parallel. This assumes the coils are identical to each other. The designer chooses which to use for ease of winding and connecting. In some strange cases, parallel connected coils can support circulating currents which are undesirable so series connection is preferred.

I'll have more on the coil sequencing. You confirm what I thought. Have you verified this is how he is doing it, or telling me how'd you do it? There is a fallacy in that method. I'll elaborate latter.
bi