Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

Your previously posted link (which since you post it, means that you agree with) establishes a Magnetic Flux direction, which comes out of NORTH and returns to South...completely ignoring the center of the Field...but that's not the point.
The point is your B Vector direction, which "happens" to coincide with this unproven directional flow "theory" from N to S.
...

Ufo, there is nothing special about the center of a magnet. It should be ignored.
You have you own theory about magnetism. I've never seen anyone of scientific reputation agree with or relate anything like it. Whereas I am in agreement with the universally accepted scientific theory.
Now you question my take on the B vector direction. That would be what is taught in every institution, textbook and tutorial. So just look it up.
The B vector direction defines the pole, not the other way around.
bi

[rakarskiy]

Dr Stan Zurek wrote that. His bio is impressive. Did you look at it? I think he is in your part of the world. Perhaps you could arrange a discussion with him about your misconceptions of Lorentz.
bi

The problem is that modern physics is concepts. Today, no physicist can say exactly what magnetism and electricity are. The professors need a discussion, I don't need it.
I do not adhere to the point of view, about the material point, in understanding the fields. The Lorenz's force initially cannot affect the "charge", since it does not yet exist. "Charging" is still worth appearing.

By the way, what do you mean by "charge" - an electric field or a magnetic field, or electrons, which, according to modern science, are already in the conductor?

Mitkevich's rule "In electrical machines, electrical power is equal to mechanical power"  Pe = EI = Blv*I = BIL*v = Fv = Pk  I have already smashed to pieces here ( Resultant Ampere Force ), or rather clarified to the real picture.


Now, in our case, we are used to taking the direction vector (B) in the magnetic flux. Now let's look at the picture of a two-pole synchronous generator, in particular, the direction of the magnetic induction vectors in the walls of the slotted rods and the wire in the groove of the stator core.

We see that the vectors in the two faces of the coil coincide, while the EMF is induced. In the wall of the groove rod, only its saturation changes with time, or, as science figuratively says, "the magnetic field changes with time."
Ostets only character of the pole field is "explosion" or "implosion".

Lorenz's strength is in great prostration, don't you think?

PS experience that the vectors coincide and the EMF is induced, Ufopolitika confirmed that in this design (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD75qPTkf_w&t=1s ), if he winds it correctly to get frames, he will just get a picture from their textbook, and the maximum unidirectional EMF, they will not butt him.

[rakarskiy]

two pole generator and stator winding   

[rakarskiy]

... there is nothing special about the center of a magnet. It should be ignored.

Are you sure about that?
I think that in the center of a magnet or electromagnet, the most "concentrated" magnetic flux (Bm), since on its pole face, the magnetic induction is B = 1/2Bm

[kolbacict]

Please answer me, a conventional car generator with a Lundel rotor.
The current consumed by the rotor magnetization winding will be the same in three cases?
1. If the rotor is stationary.
2. If the rotor rotates without load.
3. If the rotor rotates on a loaded generator.
Or will the excitation currents be different?