Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,
Thanks for the comments.

Why does "my" method* work so well (exactly and perfectly) for all electric machinery but there is nothing performing real work using or resulting from "your" method**?

* that of conventional science, technology and engineering found in the textbooks and universities over the past century.

** that which you promote in your nicely produced videos of swirling nonsense exiting both N & S poles entering thru the blotch wall of magnets and other fantasies?

bi

Hahahahahahahaha...I knew you were going to jump faster than Rakarskiy would ever have time to respond...

Btw...it is not just "me" or "mine" theory...it started by Maxwell, then Edward Minkowsky in Spacetime (Einstein Math Profesor) and many others as Walter Russell...as is also your favorite book written by Ken Wheeler...haha

Take care Bi

Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hahahahahahahaha...I knew you were going to jump faster than Rakarskiy would ever have time to respond...

Btw...it is not just "me" or "mine" theory...it started by Maxwell, then Edward Minkowsky in Spacetime (Einstein Math Profesor) and many others as Walter Russell...as is also your favorite book written by Ken Wheeler...haha

Take care Bi

Ufopolitics

Ufo,
you reply but do not answer. Why is that?
bi

[SolarLab]

For those interested,

Here is a simulation of a moving magnetic unipole across a four pole rotor.  This is done at very high efficiency with only minimal losses due to the current shuttling between the inductors via capacitors.  The bucking sequential switching between the coils produces the nearly constant unipolar field at the core ends.  L1 starts with a current bias of 500ma at t=0us and ends with ~490ma at t=40us.

Regards,
Pm

Partsman,

Very interesting simulation. Thanks.

The "shuttling" via capacitors is new to me and very "interesting!" At 0.02uF
its likely beyond the Coil (interturn self) capacitance - interesting...

SL

[SolarLab]

when you talk about LinGen, I always associate this word with lingam.
Interestingly, such an association is born in the head of the English-speaking people?
Just joke.
One note, flat linear magnetic circuits have one advantage over cylindrical ones.
It is possible to quickly change the air gap between the two halves for adjustment.

Just cut your circular device and unroll it - of course you'll miss the interaction at both ends
but its easier to work with, yea including the gap adjustment, but also easier to wind and
fabricate. Plus you can simply stack them as "modules" to cascade them.

Plus, it allows using the "metal grain" to your advantage - see Arnold Magnetics reference above.
[GOES and NGOES]

You will also find that with LinGen Rev 2 this is of great advantage (but it's still a work in progress)

I'll look up "lingam" when I get an abundance of free time 

[Ufopolitics]

Ufo,
you reply but do not answer. Why is that?
bi

Bistander,

You and I, plus many others around here know the whole story...however, no one care to make it a serious debate.
For example, the Quaternions from Maxwell...then Lorentz changing everything while "sponsored" by J.P Morgan...
Yes, as you have said, "everything works as expected" with the "conventional science"...which was basically developed by Lorentz.
Yes, I can not deny He did an excellent job by reconciliating the whole thing all together.

I have shown you my tests with CRT's...in my videos plus specific experimental images not even published in our past...but you deny to see what is very obvious to anyone.

Now, why should I insist to convince you?...if you are never, ever, going to accept it, even from a simple Geometrical way.

Anyways, I really do not want to deviate from the main debate here.

Read carefully the Thread here about the Maxwell Quaternions...and on first page (1), go to the linked paperwork, study it...deep into the essence, without wasting time just criticizing the Author's precedence or previous work, etc,etc.


Then answer there...thks.

Ufopolitics