Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[kolbacict]

This System starts by itself, based on a small charge on Cap, as also some magnetic reminiscence on the rotor core steel...and starts developing a FULL CHARGE of its Inducing Field very fast...

Yes, this was used in the electrical equipment of motorcycles in the 50s and 70s.
If the motorcycle was in the barn for several years, the rotor would demagnetize and it would not start.

[SolarLab]

Thanks SL,
So then you have output voltage of 20V_pp. I see it is not sinusoidal, but for an rms value, let's pretend, giving 7.07 volts. You said to use a 1 kOhm load. That figures to 50 mW output, assuming unity pf.
For input, I fully realize what you're saying, that is why my first attempt requested a current density. Surely there has to be a figure used for, or from the CAE. Is it correct for me to use the figure of 1 amp with 300 T/c as you stated previously? I guess I'll use 1A_rms.
bi

bi,

Note that I abruptly terminated this discussion after realizing your "expert arm-chair engineering" had
nothing to do with the device being discussed nor how the device operates and its purpose or application,
including any concept or knowledge of the design methods, techniques and tools used. 

Current density relates, for the most part, to the design of synchronous generators. It influences, to some
extent, the reactance values and short circuit current. The mass of copper, copper losses, efficiency,
manufacturing,  operating and total costs. In some speciality literature graphs and charts, as well as
mathematical programs, are used to show optimal values, generally in the kVA range.

This has little or nothing to do with the LinGen or HES, since these are NOT synchronous generators. Trying
to apply a current density criteria to these devices is out-of-scope and yields results of little or no value.
This was the final dead give away.

It was also quickly realized in what direction the discussion was headed. The same direction as nearly all
discussions on these forums ends up when an arm-chair expert attempts to impress with their new found
wikipedia expertise but they know little or nothing about the subject at hand.

Been down this road a thousand times and every trip is a waste and results in nothing of value.

Thats the way I see it - based on a wealth of experience dealing with LARPs with no concept of the subject.

Best solution is to simply agree and walk away! Any attempt at rehabilitation is futile and it fills pages and
pages with mindless nonsense.

SL

[bistander]

But I do have a "rotating part"!!...only that it is virtual...no mass...
And that is what we do NOT need, an External Power Supply to excite the Inducing Fields!!
By just spinning the Field, we should be able to generate bigger power and store it on Caps, which would be constantly replenished, keeping exciter rotor ON at all times.
Only external supply required would be to the rotating circuit, whether a small motor, or the solid state system, both easy to be fed back from main output..."nickel and dimes"...


Ufopolitics

OK. Sounds like you have your solution.
bi

[bistander]

bi,

Note that I abruptly terminated this discussion after realizing your "expert arm-chair engineering" had
nothing to do with the device being discussed nor how the device operates and its purpose or application,
including any concept or knowledge of the design methods, techniques and tools used. 

Current density relates, for the most part, to the design of synchronous generators. It influences, to some
extent, the reactance values and short circuit current. The mass of copper, copper losses, efficiency,
manufacturing,  operating and total costs. In some speciality literature graphs and charts, as well as
mathematical programs, are used to show optimal values, generally in the kVA range.

This has little or nothing to do with the LinGen or HES, since these are NOT synchronous generators. Trying
to apply a current density criteria to these devices is out-of-scope and yields results of little or no value.
This was the final dead give away.

It was also quickly realized in what direction the discussion was headed. The same direction as nearly all
discussions on these forums ends up when an arm-chair expert attempts to impress with their new found
wikipedia expertise but they know little or nothing about the subject at hand.

Been down this road a thousand times and every trip is a waste and results in nothing of value.

Thats the way I see it - based on a wealth of experience dealing with LARPs with no concept of the subject.

Best solution is to simply agree and walk away! Any attempt at rehabilitation is futile and it fills pages and
pages with mindless nonsense.

SL

SL,
So you really don't have those pants. And continue believing current density is irrelevant. Feel the same about flux density? You can't even give a simple answer to the turns count. Or input power. Good luck with that prototype.
See ya.
bi

[bistander]

Hello,

Point is that if we completely remove the Output Coils of a Generator...and rotate its exciter rotor, the Energy would be produced at its Stator Feedback Coils and sent back to keep rotor energized...and that is the point, all we need to do is spin the Magnetic Field...without ANY EXTERNAL Input directly to the Exciter System...

For example, in my setup, I can rotate the Magnetic Field with just 12 Volts and some milliamps to the small motor Rotary Switch system...while this rotation will trigger the excitement system to start generating on the exciter coils back and forth exchange for up to 170 Volts and 2.0 Amps...

It is simple...it could be done Guys!!

I am working on having also a belt of magnets which will "act" as the PMG on a 3 Phase Generator exciter armature...except, it will be rotated just by the 3 phase system from its exciter coils...then inducing the output coils.

Regards

Ufopolitics

For example, in my setup, I can rotate the Magnetic Field with just 12 Volts and some milliamps to the small motor Rotary Switch system...while this rotation will trigger the excitement system to start generating on the exciter coils back and forth exchange for up to 170 Volts and 2.0 Amps...

Ufo,
But you have power fed to the generator field thru the brushes and comm driven by the small 12V motor. So it is hardly getting 340W out for 12V*some mA input. How much power have you been able to draw off of the generator armature?
bi