Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

bistander

Thanks SL, I remember that.

By success I thought you meant that you actually built something that worked.
bi

SolarLab

Define "Success," define "built something" and define "worked!" OK, briefly:

Sucess => Knowing the detailed theory of device operation, proving that operation through
the use of professional CAE and other tools, developing a method of fabricating that device
which is cost effective, optimizing the device's operation, fabricating a "brass board" prototype,
varifying the device using bench and insitu beta testing, performing the required regulatory
examinations and requirements, and determining the best methods of manufacture, application
and distribution.

As such => Success. I've taken one aspect of the HES device from patent disclosure all the way
to an actual device and provided the detailed theory along the way.
For me, and likely many others, that's defined as a Success!

And, for your information, Youtube videos and forum Cartoon Pictures are of little value, IMHO.
We all know how to wind coils already! The proof-of-concept and the understanding of that concept
is what really counts and is the really important part! Individual fabrication schemes are not of any
real importance once you understand the theory.

I have never seen any youtube videos nor pictures of "succcessful devices," that included any
credible or varified "theory-of-operation," including fabrication details, except for those found on
the HES channel, including the LinGen, and were re-posted on the forums.

Therefore, I believe I'm quite safe in claiming the LinGen is the first "excess energy" device that
explains in detail how and where the "excess energy" is generated and how to build such a device.
Thus => Sucess!

Now, if you're still claiming the device outlined in the pdf linked below is not a success, then we simply
see things differently. You are, of course, free to do things the way you see best; but please don't try to
impose your prospectives or projections on others! TIA

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg574533/#msg574533 

SL

bistander

Quote from: SolarLab on February 26, 2023, 12:18:29 PM
Define "Success," define "built something" and define "worked!" OK, briefly:

Sucess => Knowing the detailed theory of device operation, proving that operation through
the use of professional CAE and other tools, developing a method of fabricating that device
which is cost effective, optimizing the device's operation, fabricating a "brass board" prototype,
varifying the device using bench and insitu beta testing, performing the required regulatory
examinations and requirements, and determining the best methods of manufacture, application
and distribution.

As such => Success. I've taken one aspect of the HES device from patent disclosure all the way
to an actual device and provided the detailed theory along the way.
For me, and likely many others, that's defined as a Success!

And, for your information, Youtube videos and forum Cartoon Pictures are of little value, IMHO.
We all know how to wind coils already! The proof-of-concept and the understanding of that concept
is what really counts and is the really important part! Individual fabrication schemes are not of any
real importance once you understand the theory.

I have never seen any youtube videos nor pictures of "succcessful devices," that included any
credible or varified "theory-of-operation," including fabrication details, except for those found on
the HES channel, including the LinGen, and were re-posted on the forums.

Therefore, I believe I'm quite safe in claiming the LinGen is the first "excess energy" device that
explains in detail how and where the "excess energy" is generated and how to build such a device.
Thus => Sucess!

Now, if you're still claiming the device outlined in the pdf linked below is not a success, then we simply
see things differently. You are, of course, free to do things the way you see best; but please don't try to
impose your prospectives or projections on others! TIA

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg574533/#msg574533 

SL

Hi SL,

Good for you. You must be proud. Enjoy your success.

However I fail to see anything useful that can be replicated and be proven to function in actual application or a written theory having peer review and accepted in the scientific community.

There is no need for you rant and call me names as you've done before. I've said my view. I'll stand by and watch.
bi

ps. Upon preview of my reply, I see you added a note with pdf link. I admit that I am not familiar with the software which generated those graphs, but using visual approximations, I see about 100 watts input and  60VA output.

SolarLab

Hi bistander,

Maybe you can elaborate in detail on your findings and conclusions from the
CAE charts and the system in general. Some real detailed engineering analysis
would be helpful - but not relating to rotating motor or generator theories; we
all know most of that already and it's well covered in the literature.

Maybe their CAE results and my measurements need re-examination! Could
be useful feedback to give to HES, Ansys, SW-EMS, and CST as well.

Thanks in advance.

Expert analysis of the actual design, and technical reviews, are always appreciated.

SL


bistander

Quote from: SolarLab on February 26, 2023, 02:30:25 PM
Hi bistander,

Maybe you can elaborate in detail on your findings and conclusions from the
CAE charts and the system in general. Some real detailed engineering analysis
would be helpful - but not relating to rotating motor or generator theories; we
all know most of that already and it's well covered in the literature.

Maybe their CAE results and my measurements need re-examination! Could
be useful feedback to give to HES, Ansys, SW-EMS, and CST as well.

Thanks in advance.

Expert analysis of the actual design, and technical reviews, are always appreciated.

SL

No thanks SL,
I've learned my lesson from you. I didn't intend to reply further. As I mentioned, casual interpretation of the charts was all, in hopes that you might inform us the actual power input and output.
bi