Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

If we remove antimagnetism, black holes and other literary aphorisms, an interesting patent to check. Probably there are no attempts to reproduce. The idea of ​​the game of switching threads is very funny, in some places it intersects with Figuera. There are solutions that are incomprehensible from the point of view of EMF, there will be idle locked sections. Holcomb's cleanliness is even further away, as Holcomb is a traditional synchronous generator with only no moving parts.

[kolbacict]

This is how magnetic contactless transmission works.
Only I have a stator with a three-phase current instead of the primary shaft, and instead of the secondary shaft, the rotation of the electron beam.

[bistander]

This is how magnetic contactless transmission works.
Only I have a stator with a three-phase current instead of the primary shaft, and instead of the secondary shaft, the rotation of the electron beam.

Hi kolbacict,
The transmission has 3 members. Outer magnets <-> steel middle. And inner magnets <-> steel middle.   <-> symbol indicates reaction force both directions.

Electron beam has no reaction force on the metal plates used in the middle member. So it will not behave the same as magnets. Also, the electron beam does not have a pole count like a inner ring of magnets. It only reflects pole count put to it from magnetic field.

So I would not expect different frequency.
bi

[kolbacict]

Hi bi
I agree that the electron beam has no poles.
But that the electron beam has no reaction force, I would argue.
In that case it couldn't move. IMHO.

So I would not expect different frequency.

And so, you might be right.

[bistander]

Hi bi
I agree that the electron beam has no poles.
But that the electron beam has no reaction force, I would argue.
In that case it couldn't move. IMHO.And so, you might be right.

You are correct, but in this context, would/could that electron beam have enough force to move your steel? That is what I meant..
bi