Is it possible to achieve overunity on this device ??? Test Video

[stivep]

What about those machines that work to cool the environment?
Without the presence of an initial temperature difference ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRjGm9G4ivc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NON-75zaJE

it is you looking at  a local phenomena taking place in one part of the system.
Example:looking at the raising level of water in the bucket may look like a magic if
we don't know that at the bottom of the bucket there is a  tubing,and water comes from  another  elevated  bucket.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/262838/can-i-recirculate-water-from-an-open-reservoir-to-the-bottom-of-a-bigger-closed

Refrigerator working principle.
A refrigerator works on the vapor compression refrigeration cycle.
There are four parts (Expansion Valve, compressor, evaporator, condenser)
you need to look at all of them and processes in all of them
Analyze this summary output of energy (as one) and take it as a resulting conclusion.
Wesley

[stivep]

is it possible that COP > 1

Here is the answer:
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p

__________________________________________________________
Forum I don't like much is hackaday.
My assumption is that is controlled by some Russians there as it is heavily altering, phrases
words, and meanings of responders that are not in line or criticizing mainstream.

However reading comments of haters, deniers, of energy for free is very much educative.
If you based on your knowledge have an answer to their comments, it only means
that you are educated in a given field of expertise.

Quoted below statement not only credited, opposition but also response
of those who didn't give up their own verification in area of energy.
https://hackaday.com/2016/01/25/overunity-free-energy-and-perpetual-motion-the-strange-side-of-youtube/

Wesley

[JackJohn]

a

[ramset]

Here we highlight an issue with an international forum!
Language
How to interact with each other respectfully?
And still maintain our goals as outlined in our hosts mission statement!


Here we have a man asking for help (original poster "OP"(JackJohn)


And this man uses wording our host uses in his forum name !!
Which is now a sort of battle??


IMO we should shun negative interactions whenever possible ( in this case are we to reprimand our
Host for this confusion?( use of term overunity?)
OR....every member who writes the phrase ( in perpetuity??)


Also here we had helpful advice to gentlemen ...how to measure etc etc
And now it's a mine field?


Not proper or fair to him and others reading who may also have language barrier to overcome !


Now I also have issues with words perceived as insulting and members reactions
This actually is in violation of proper ( or walking fine line) forum terms !(TOS)
Once it becomes apparent ( it is perceived as offensive) it should be stifled !


This is exactly how flame wars begin ( our hosts term)
And MUST be avoided at all costs ( respect to our host and his house rules)


Ultimately we need to nurture the builders environment
so those completely lacking language skills can get a fair chance to get help here..
And share their work!


Which BTW is what we are here to do !


Please !!! tolerance!!


We need to work together... and for clarity Mr.UFO is one very determined experimenter/researcher
Who shares his work open source for many years !


Much more I could write here ...
Hopefully the message is clear enuff


Apologies to OP (original poster... JackJohn
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
I believe there may be a little cleanup happening here in near future ( remove off topic and ?

[sm0ky2]

@stivep


Constructive criticism is always welcome. Were it not for the level-headed disbeliever,
many mistakes and oversights would run rampant.


I personally must disagree with your assessment. Not from a lack of knowledge,
but from decades of experience in the field of free energy research.
I have witnessed working systems that draw on the laws of physics to produce the
results we would consider 'perpetual motion', '0-point energy', 'free energy', or renewable from a
yet unknown source. All of these things exist, in various forms.


The science against it is more of a religion that anything based in fact.


The same physics that control a thermonuclear reaction can be performed in every area of science.
Sound, light, heat, physical vibration, emf, and other forms of radiation.


Gravity and magnetism can also be made to play a dance that never ends.


Capillary action can rise water against gravity of its' own nature, and tricked out of the tube at the top.
This demonstrates a literal gain in potential gravitational energy,
from the force of gravity and water tension.


Jet propulsion technology can be used to engineer nozzles that project fluid higher than the source pool.


Coherent laser light can be combined in-phase to produce a beam more powerful than the combined beams inputs.


Molecular catalysts can be used to increase the energy state of a chemical system, removing them leaves a state of non-equilibrium. And thus excess energy in a cycle that can be repeated.


We cannot simply dismiss an idea because 'no ideas can work'. This is not only a falsality, but is poor science.


Instead we must look at WHY it cannot work, and when possible, at ways that it Could.


This particular device however, unless there is more information not yet given,
I don't see it being possible to work.