Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)

[JackJohn]

The Newman motor has been around for years and I have not heard of any OU Newman motor. The Bedini motor was likely OU in that it did two things.
1. A motor ran - mechanical and
2. the back emf charged a battery.

If that back emf was used to run another motor then 1 power unit in would run 2 motors giving 2 mechanical outputs. 

As for the Newman motor and neos the coils have to match the neos or there will be "deadlocked flux". I never use neos until the concept is rock solid proven.

I wish you success.

Norman

Thank you sir for visiting and enlightening
In my opinion, overunity or free energy devices are tool/Device that are able to produce more power than the power needed to work or you can say COP > 1 (as simple as that), but I'm sure other masters may not agree with me on this because in the previous post there was a debate on several master comments that the definitions of Overunity and Free Energy Device were different.
Regarding Mr. Joseph Newman, I am not very interested in the whole concept of the device and also do not want to replicate the device. For me the biggest contribution of Mr. Josep Newman is about how he opened our mindset about "generating a large electromagnetic field does not always rely on strong currents but can also by using a large number of turns of copper wire and only a little power" and this for me is the main key in creating a Free Energy Device

but as I said above if "Overunity or Free Energy Device is a device that is able to produce more power than the power needed to work / COP > 1 " Then I am very sure that Mr. Josep Newman's device is OU
Sometimes it's very funny when we see (students, researchers or scientists) who research Newman devices at that time firstly they know an sure after doing a lot of measurement that the device is successful and then change the statement otherwise. guess who is right? 

[JackJohn]

THINK ABOUT THIS
This is sufficient to explain that the power that comes out of the secondary coil is the EFFECT of the movement of electrons in the primary coil which creates an electromagnet, so it doesn't take power from the primary coil directly

when the EMF and Back EMF processes occur, both will induce a secondary coil with a different polarity. so it can be seen in the picture on the right that the power from the power supply is only taken when the switch is on / during EMF and when the switch is off (Back EMF) then the power from the power supply is not taken while in the picture on the left we can see there are 2 inductions that occur and when entering the diode bridge then both (both positive or negative power will be DC voltage)

[JackJohn]

Continuation from 1st Idea Picture (Simple Pulse DC into AC)
I remind you very specifically for taking power from Back EMF (D1 & D2), you must use Schottky Diodes having a voltage range of 1000V (this is one of the keys to successful Back EMF trapping), while Capacitor C1 must use an HV Capacitor in the 250V to 450V range.
"And the DC output from the Back EMF must always be connected to the load because if it is not given a load, the voltage will continue to rise until it exceeds the voltage limit of the capacitor C1 and will explode due to overload."

THREE ADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING BACK EMF

1. GET USEFUL DC POWER
2. SECURING THE ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT OF PULSE DC MODULE / PWM GENERATOR AND ALSO MOSFET POWER
3. From single pulse DC power input we can Get 2 Usefull DC Power output

[JackJohn]

Sorry for those who follow my post, for some time I will stop making posts, so that I can focus more on completing the FED device project from some of my ideas and just reminding my video channel to upload my device work progress

https://www.dailymotion.com/JackJohn-Device  Dailymotion
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNq7mOliCpU-2znPht1ihxA  youtube

hopefully Free Energy Device can be realized soon from me or from all of you, good luck to you all