More clairifaction of floors Twist Drive

[Willy]

From Wikipedia

" arrangement in which a worm meshes with a worm wheel. The two elements
are also called the worm screw and worm gear. The terminology is often
confused by imprecise use of the term worm gear to refer to the worm, the worm
wheel, or the worm drive as a unit. "

If you have ever examined a "worm drive unit", in hand, you may have noticed
that it requires less force to turn the worm WHEEL shaft, if you simultaneously apply
a force to turn the worm SCREW shaft (in the correct direction).

The same applies also, when force is applied to the worm screw shaft while
simultaneously applying force to the worm wheel shaft.

This has to do with the directions of the application of forces (direction aspect of the force vector), leverage and friction
between the various components within the worm drive unit.

This remains true in either direction of rotation of the input shafts.

The total ENERGY required to turn the shafts can be less when force is applied to
both shafts simultaneously than if force is applied to one shaft only.

The twist drive unit, has characteristics which are in ways similar.

[Willy]

One of the reasons why, many mechanical devices utilize continuously rotating
parts is to reduce the amount of energy which would other wise be expended
to cause repetitive accelerations against inertia.  i.e. This is what happens in
reciprocating motions.

Quasi over unity: more energy out than in, during a portion of a complete cycle,
but no net gain, as the result of the complete cycle.

Thus far I have not devised any method by which to produce a quasi over unity,
wherein, all moving components continuously rotate. No self runners either.
Those are not actually nor particularly the goals of my explorations.

The twist drive, (any physical device would) wastes energy by repetitive accelerations.
The faster the speeds reached are during its operation, the greater is the amount of energy
it wastes in repetitively causing accelerations.

A greater energy expenditure is required in order to accelerate any given mass to a
greater speed, than is required to accelerate that same mass to some lesser speed.

The amount of time it takes for any given mass to accelerate to a any particular
speed does not change the amount of energy required in order for that mass to
reach that speed.  All that matters is the amount of the mass and the final speed that it
reaches.

It is desirable to get more energy per unit of time (power) from any energy source.
The mass and resistance to acceleration of the magnets and other parts within a twist
drive impose limitations upon the speed of its operation.

Presently...

I am looking at / looking for / looking toward, understanding the twist drive's internal
events as if they were wave forms and how there might be analogies to  the Holcum Energy
System / other devices.

There are models of amplitude of and width of wave forms present here.

1. of five parts...
On one side of the interface between the two magnet's is the sliding magnet.
On the other side of the interface between the two magnets is the rotating magnet.

2. of five parts
Dual and opposing twist drives as a complex of wave forms.

3. of five parts
Cascaded twist drives as a complex of wave forms.

4. of five parts
Dual and opposing, cascaded twist drives as a complex of wave forms.

5. of five parts
Magnet falling through coil, or, flywheel acceleration.

[Willy]

Replacing the role that gravity plays on the ROtating side of the twist drive, with
a second twist drive that opposes a first twist drive.

Each one's 'output' resets the other twist drive. Simultaneously they each, in turn
push the electricity generating magnet through a coil ( at a right angle to gravity).

Cascaded twist drives.  One drives two, two drive four, four drive eight and so on.
The cascade is reset by an opposing set of cascaded twist drives. At the juncture of
the two sets,  the electricity generating magnet is pushed through a coil ( at a right
angle to gravity).

[Willy]

The last several posts here, by willy (yours truly), LankaIV, and CITFTA
have been moved to

https://overunity.com/18497/floor-sweepings-dust-bin/msg577939/#msg577939

To maintain continuity in this topic.

   willy

[Willy]

There are in some permanent magnet interaction out comes which are
much like unto the actions of a mechanical lever.

Examples...

A lesser force is applied over a longer distance of travel upon the long end of a
lever which is traded for a greater force being present over a shorter distance of travel
by the short end of the lever.

             OR
       in reverse

A greater force is applied over a shorter distance of travel upon the short end of a
lever which is traded for a lesser force being present over a longer distance of travel
by the long end of the lever.

Either way and before considerations of loses, these interaction balance to
a zero net gain in energy.


           BUT

There are numerous and various permanent magnet interactions for which
                                            THERE ARE NO
similar nor analogous actions which can be accomplished by means of a mechanical
lever.

The Twist Drive magnet interactions, as described in this topic result in
                   

1. A lesser force is applied over a lesser distance of travel upon a first side of the magnet
interactions, which is traded for a greater force being present over a greater distance
of travel upon a second side of the magnet interactions.

        and then
       in reverse

2.  A greater force is applied over a greater distance of travel upon the second side of the
magnet interactions, which is traded for a lesser force being present over a lesser distance
of travel upon the first side of the magnet interactions.

These two parts of a complete cycling of the device result in a NO net gain in energy and
NO net loss in energy (before considerations of losses by friction and so on).

                                          REPEAT, THERE ARE NO
                              similar nor analogous actions which can
                       be accomplished by means of a mechanical lever.

      Although this Twist Drive kind of interaction results in NO over unity in and of itself,
                                           the Twist Drive interactions do
                                     RESULT IN AN OVER UNITY OUTCOME
            when combined with a next process of permanent magnet interactions.