Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity!

[sm0ky2]

Well guys they appear to be right.


<1/4 ft lb = > 5 ft lbs


https://youtu.be/woejdNvCZpc


Need some quantitative testing with accurate measurements
But at face value it seems to check out

[sm0ky2]

Out of curiosity i tried to belt a motor to the upper disk
Hoping to generate measurable current


To my surprise; the spinning magnetic field tries to drive the small dc motor
(opposed at first but when i flipped it over tried to drive the disk that was powering it!)


Not sure where to go with that. To remove the situation i suppose i could find a longer belt

[Jimboot]

Out of curiosity i tried to belt a motor to the upper disk
Hoping to generate measurable current


To my surprise; the spinning magnetic field tries to drive the small dc motor
(opposed at first but when i flipped it over tried to drive the disk that was powering it!)


Not sure where to go with that. To remove the situation i suppose i could find a longer belt

could the prime mover be a pulse motor and do away with the belt?

[sm0ky2]

I don't see why not


So long as the pulse motor produces enough impulse torque to overcome the magnetic compression necessary to overcome the moment of inertia of the secondary rotor mass.


Also theres a number that seems consistent regardless of the size or proportionality of the device
I don't know what it means but:


Pi * r^2 = 1/2 pi having to do with torque amplification
(note: these tests were done with a diametric constraint of the gap size:[/size]
Total Gap (left + right) ~= diameter of inner drive magnet assembly)[/size]
i left just enough clearance for rotation.[/size]

[/size]

[sm0ky2]

Its slightly above 10:1 torque amplification
Adding more weight doesn't increase or decrease this value


Although adding more devices on a common shaft like the inventor might