Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity!

[wampum]

I watched their videos and then used chatgpt to crunch the numbers. Here are the results:
Improvement percentage = (New value - Old value) / Old value * 100

Where:
- Old value = 0.2110 ft-lb
- New value = 4.2396

Substituting these values in the formula:

Improvement percentage = (4.2396 - 0.2110) / 0.2110 * 100
Improvement percentage = 1905.21%

Therefore, the improvement percentage is approximately 1905.21%.

.I apologize for the confusion earlier. I have reviewed the FAQ section on MotoFluxPower.com and I couldn't find any information about a movie or video that explains the difference on 1905.21%. However, according to their website, MotoFluxPower.com claims that their patented motor concept uses a unique combination of radial select capability and contoured pole tips to offer increased rotational torque using just the power of nature. They also claim that their design can be used in place of any electric motor application from powering vehicles to manufacturing equipment. The improvement percentage calculated earlier was based on the input and output values provided and does not necessarily imply that overunity has been achievedTo calculate the improvement percentage, we can use the formula:

but i disagree with you (ChatGPT) since there is data in their video proving that overunity has been achieved by way of magnets. what do you have to say about this clarification?
It said sorry. I'm new and terminated itself.

[ramset]

Bump


Been discussing this with a few open source builders ...
Gotoluc is most definitely intrigued.. although he is
Quite busy on an unrelated ( to FE research) project ATM
For perhaps the rest of this month...


Hopefully a builders board can be started after some simple tests show promise?
I know Smokey did a quick mockup which seemed to imply a path worth investigating
Will repost that here ...

[Cloxxki]

I watched their videos and then used chatgpt to crunch the numbers. Here are the results:
Improvement percentage = (New value - Old value) / Old value * 100

Where:
- Old value = 0.2110 ft-lb
- New value = 4.2396

Substituting these values in the formula:

Improvement percentage = (4.2396 - 0.2110) / 0.2110 * 100
Improvement percentage = 1905.21%

Therefore, the improvement percentage is approximately 1905.21%.

.I apologize for the confusion earlier. I have reviewed the FAQ section on MotoFluxPower.com and I couldn't find any information about a movie or video that explains the difference on 1905.21%. However, according to their website, MotoFluxPower.com claims that their patented motor concept uses a unique combination of radial select capability and contoured pole tips to offer increased rotational torque using just the power of nature. They also claim that their design can be used in place of any electric motor application from powering vehicles to manufacturing equipment. The improvement percentage calculated earlier was based on the input and output values provided and does not necessarily imply that overunity has been achievedTo calculate the improvement percentage, we can use the formula:

but i disagree with you (ChatGPT) since there is data in their video proving that overunity has been achieved by way of magnets. what do you have to say about this clarification?
It said sorry. I'm new and terminated itself.

What job did you give Chat GPT? Because even that simple calc us off a bit. Typo? +1909% would be closer. But don't trust me, I barely finished high school.

I've found that even the most basic physics calculations, it will mess up.

I had it calculate a theoretical power and speed for a perfectly double scaled submarine. It needed a lot of guidance and correction. Every step of the way it would acknowledge my correction, but it tool a while to get it to agree to the number I had in mind, whether that was ever correct or not.
Seems it takes SOME fomulas it can find, and then with misplaced confidence applies them, eliminating what it can't place. You can't trust Chat GPT with physics calcs any better than you can trust a Tesla on Autopilot approaching a tight bend in the road. It's also very modern "science" biased. What billionaires and governments want the populous to know. Chat GPT was programmed by Microsoft people and fed with data that was allowed to be online and part of its dataset by 2019.

To me the torque means little. I expect someone who can build THAT apparatus to attached efficient drive motor and generator with battery to loop it, or better: a mechanical loop. If it can really demonstrate over-torque at 37 rpm or whatever, I'm quite confident that with Legos and ultra basic crafts supplied, I'd mechanically loop it.
If a very specific input drive is needed, all it takes is a good torque and speed logging and program that into an efficient drive motor. The people to do that work are right here in this community, and they'd do it in their leisure time.

It's fancy website and video, but the inventor seems to want to make it the problem of an investor to actually make it work? If he'd ask help from builders, I bet he'd get it but they'd immediately be asking the right questions.

[heinzpg]

I watched their videos and then used chatgpt to crunch the numbers. Here are the results:
Improvement percentage = (New value - Old value) / Old value * 100

Where:
- Old value = 0.2110 ft-lb
- New value = 4.2396

Substituting these values in the formula:

Improvement percentage = (4.2396 - 0.2110) / 0.2110 * 100
Improvement percentage = 1905.21%

Therefore, the improvement percentage is approximately 1905.21%.

.I apologize for the confusion earlier. I have reviewed the FAQ section on MotoFluxPower.com and I couldn't find any information about a movie or video that explains the difference on 1905.21%. However, according to their website, MotoFluxPower.com claims that their patented motor concept uses a unique combination of radial select capability and contoured pole tips to offer increased rotational torque using just the power of nature. They also claim that their design can be used in place of any electric motor application from powering vehicles to manufacturing equipment. The improvement percentage calculated earlier was based on the input and output values provided and does not necessarily imply that overunity has been achievedTo calculate the improvement percentage, we can use the formula:

but i disagree with you (ChatGPT) since there is data in their video proving that overunity has been achieved by way of magnets. what do you have to say about this clarification?
It said sorry. I'm new and terminated itself.

I am also new here. In the FAQ section of the MotoFlux Website I found the following in answer to the question if this is a free energy device:  "To the best of our knowledge (and the scientific community in general), there is no such thing as free energy. At the very least, the production of permanent magnets requires energy. Also, the operation of the radial field director requires energy. "

This is a strange explanation! Only a part of the energy used in production of magnets can be found in the magnet, and if you buy a magnet, you have to pay for all the energy which was used in the production and for much more. Thus, if the MotoFlux machine just delivers this energy, the costs of the machine with its magnets must be considerable higher than the costs of the energy which can be gained! I have tried to get a clarification about this but I only got a very short answer by Mr. Corbin which ignored my question and no more answer on a second try. The whole construction is dubious. I can't understand there is an increase of torque. There is actio and reactio. If there is a torque on the shaft with magnets, there must be an equal counter-torque on the shaft of the director and this torque must be overcome by the motor driving the director.

[lumen]

Maybe someone could go there to verify the results or possibly get some exact cad drawings to build a duplicate (or scale) device for testing for peer review?