Centrifugal Energy Multiplication Machine

[Tarsier_79]

Thanks Hazem.

I didn't have too much of a problem with the chains.

My smaller and earlier unit with CNC wooden gears which was much stronger structurally, but had a lot more friction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BCY4b2uhbU

No, my big problem was with gravity operated latches at relatively high rotational speeds.

[Hazem]

Thanks Hazem.

I didn't have too much of a problem with the chains.

My smaller and earlier unit with CNC wooden gears which was much stronger structurally, but had a lot more friction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BCY4b2uhbU

No, my big problem was with gravity operated latches at relatively high rotational speeds.

Hello Tarsier_79,

Gravity is proportional to time and it is inversely proportional to velocity. So, if your machine depends on gravity continuously as long as it is rotating, then this dependency will be an issue as your machine gets higher in speed. Hence, at a certain RPM, your "gravity operated latches" are going to stop reacting eventually, and your machine will not yield what you have expected. On the other hand, if you try to keep the RPM as low as possible, then the centrifugal force will be too low to lift your secondary weight into over-balance. I think it is an issue you have to consider in your next design.

[Cloxxki]

Thanks for the explanations. I'm afraid I can't follow and certainly lack astronomical knowledge to falsify your statements.
As you clearly have great computer drawing skills, why not put the system in a simulator? As you are of the opinion that it's all established principles, the simulation software ought to handily show the surplus you expect.
In the simulation you can try sizes, weights and rpms that would take considerable high level engineering to accomplish in the metal. If truly OU, it will be well worth building to the very more efficient specification, even if it take high grade titanium and carbon fibre alongside tungsten in a super aerodynamic design. Or just inside a vacuum chamber, those get more cost efficient with size.

Can you if needed collab with a simulation draftsman to delay the significant time and resource of a build? Let's see it in the sim!

[Hazem]

Thanks for the explanations. I'm afraid I can't follow and certainly lack astronomical knowledge to falsify your statements.
As you clearly have great computer drawing skills, why not put the system in a simulator? As you are of the opinion that it's all established principles, the simulation software ought to handily show the surplus you expect.
In the simulation you can try sizes, weights and rpms that would take considerable high level engineering to accomplish in the metal. If truly OU, it will be well worth building to the very more efficient specification, even if it take high grade titanium and carbon fibre alongside tungsten in a super aerodynamic design. Or just inside a vacuum chamber, those get more cost efficient with size.

Can you if needed collab with a simulation draftsman to delay the significant time and resource of a build? Let's see it in the sim!

Hello Cloxxki, I hope you are doing well.

I am planning to make a dynamic simulation for this design using "Autodesk Inventor" .. I am new to this field of technology, but I have started my journey learning it. In fact, I have made the digital simulation for the "Elliptical Orbit Drive" (which  I have posted above) using it. I just need enough time to be able to use this software precisely.

[Hazem]

Hello everyone,


I have done a physical simulation for the Elliptical Orbit Drive. Mass A = 3 kg, and the input power is 10 watts. Simulation data and graphical results are in the attachments (Excel). Simulation video available on YouTube through the following URl:


https://youtu.be/yrW7-VV7mq4


Please remember that one hand cannot clap alone. We must join hands and cooperate.



Regards