Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



new magnetic motor goes 2000 rpm without load 1000 rpm with load

Started by magnacoaster, March 09, 2007, 01:37:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

magnacoaster

ok we have done more testing and have a new plan as of right now

input voltage to motor

12 vdc @ 1.5 amps

output from motor circuit

200 vac @ 2.5 amps



this gives us a  2700 % increase

we have reached unity

Ergo

I cannot belive anything of this.
Your statements clearly show faulty measurements.
You haven't really shown how you have performed you measurements nor have you measured
the input vs output voltage and current waveforms on a oscilloscope neither have you used certified instruments.
This clearly show that you haven't got a clue how electrical measurements are made.

Do you really belive that you have 2700% more output than input whithout questioning your own results without
any doubt or asked for professional certification? Then you are not fit to belong in this forum.

Basic Rules:
1: Don't make judgements yourselves on your results. Let professionals judge them.
2: Show exactly how you made your measurements in every little detail. Unless this is made your reports stink.
3: You should really take some lessons in electrical physics in how to make correct measurements and how to present them.
4: Most important. Make a self runner capable of doing some heavy work besides being a self runner. Show professionals your setup.

magnacoaster

I cannot belive anything of this.
Your statements clearly show faulty measurements.

i did not do my own measurements  we had it done by the university


You haven't really shown how you have performed you measurements nor have you measured
the input vs output voltage and current waveforms on a oscilloscope neither have you used certified instruments.

his instraments were certified and we checked them before and after

This clearly show that you haven't got a clue how electrical measurements are made.

well i seem to be the one who has done this and he agreed (prof) with me there was 12 vdc @ 1.5 amps in
and 200 vac @ 2.5 out as we need to have a way to make sure if the battery explodes it can be contained
as well as we need to do more testing to see how to get the most from the voltage

it was running @ 5 nano seconds betweeen waves this was fast power

Do you really belive that you have 2700% more output than input whithout questioning your own results without any doubt or asked for professional certification?

we will be going back within a few weeks as we all need time to digest what we have found as well as to get a handle on a way to slow the wave down and convert the power to useable DC



Then you are not fit to belong in this forum.

you are mister grumpy i see

Basic Rules:
1: Don't make judgements yourselves on your results. Let professionals judge them.
did that
2: Show exactly how you made your measurements in every little detail. Unless this is made your reports stink.
i will be doing this
3: You should really take some lessons in electrical physics in how to make correct measurements and how to present them.
why so they can teach me why it would never work (i have changed a few text books)
4: Most important. Make a self runner capable of doing some heavy work besides being a self runner. Show professionals your setup.

with a change in the windings and some parts we can get 100 amps @ 200 acv out and only put in 12 volts can you do it ?

wattsup

@Ergo

Relax will yeh already. No need to blast your horn. MC has been working very hard on his device(s) for months and months now and is showing it here and deserves some recognition. What he made did not materialize out of thin air.

Look at his previous set-up. That small motor on the right is turning that heavy inertia wheel in the center that is turning a chain gear coupled to his generator. The gears are I'd say 3:1 (3 turns of prime mover to 1 turn of generator). The 3:1 ratio matched to the inertia wheel produces alot of energy onto the generator. It seems he is also using a switching system to reduce BEMF on the generator but I could be wrong. Alot of this is Tesla. Everything is slim and not much room for wasted energy as heat developed in a standard generator. The only waste will be the chain gears friction. I don't see any capacitor(s) that could help in capturing BEMF.

@MC

You said "we have reached unity".
That's overunity if you ask me.

Good work man. It must have taken hours and days just to balance those wheels, let alone work your components into them. Fantastic work indeed. A true creator and great precision.

Please describe to us your new set-up or a photo and if possible try to explain how the university was measuring your results. Did they make a block diagram of the set-up and show where and how the measurements were made? See my previous post above.

I saw your other Youtubes, Good work. I know you are excited as we can sense your very exuberant attitude. Keep your good spirit.

A good proof is using a battery, showing that power never goes down and lighting up x watts of light bulbs showing voltage and amperage for x hours. This is a winner. Even better is looping the ouput power back to the prime mover off of a small 12V-4A battery while llighting up some bulbs. The smaller the battery, the better is the proof. Or even looping straight if the system can cut it. You may need an small AC//DC transformer to do this since the out/in voltages may not concur.

Ergo

Sorry but I'd really like some proof this time instead of just hearing the same story over and over
from some guy here that reports OU and then there is silence when we ask for validation.
And 2700% OU sound just to good to be true, and so far OU has never been true when tested for real.

I encourage you Magnacoaster to really prove your setup with real data and documents on your design
so it can be replicated and verified by other members at this forum of Overunity.

If you indeed have got "real" overunity then I'm really sorry for flaming you.
In this case you should have the Nobelprise and congratulations from the whole wide world.