OverUnity prize money 15825 US$ total until now

[PaulLowrance]

Safety is our first concern.

Sure, if the "free energy" machine is working with nuclear stuff. I'm not. I'm working with diodes and common transformers.  Like the other guy said, CERN is the concern for safety. A recent analysis from conventional physicist who specialize in quantum physics have said that the lifespan of these particles is far longer than previously predicted. A lot of models are clearly showing that the micro blackhole could survive. One model places a 1 in 8 chance of the Earth being destroyed. And even if the Earth survived, the particle would travel out in space and destroy countless other solar systems. We should be concerned about that.

PL

[jibbguy]

If anyone has been specifically threatened or suppressed in any way i suggest they tell us all about it: Details, dates, general locations, descriptions, and anything else that would help get the news out credibly. There are over 15 million peeps in America alone who regularly surf internet political blogs. If i believe you, i will personally see that the news gets spread around to most of these blogs... Believe me, the interest will be there, what has been lacking is people willing to come forward to relate their experiences. This is the way to nullify the threat, and the way to defeat them.

Everyone who has failed in the past did so because they tried to keep the stuff secret, tried to go it alone to get the maximum money, fame, whatever: Thus it was easy to get rid of them with one tactic or another. When you Open Source everything, what is the point of threatening or killing you? The damage is already done and it would be risky behavior for no gain. When the secretive inventors are suppressed, threatened, or killed all that remains is an "Urban Legend" that they can easily deflect simply by using the old card of "conspiracy nuts". When people go public as soon as they are threatened or suppressed with details, the bad guys have no choice but to back off; and they are suddenly on the defense. Criminal activities can only exist in the "dark", the light of day whithers them like the Wicked Witch of the West

....In fact then the only "safe" tactic they have left, that doesn't risk their exposure, is to try to convince people not to do it... Not to Open Source, not to go public.

And yes, this of course only matters for true working F-E devices. We know that many inventors have been paid off, many given gag orders and their devices "secretized", some threatened, some had arson and theft, and some even killed. They wouldn't do these things for fakes that don't work ... So either the people who relate these stories or lying, or the devices were "real". T. Henry Moray was a devoted and religious family man, a Mormon. It is pretty hard to call him a liar Many others who claim suppressions are credible and believable; and also hard to call liars since nothing else they have done has discredited them.

Regarding F-E devices being "too dangerous": The idea that a working magnetic / pulsed motor-generator that produces large amounts of OU energy is "dangerous" is pretty silly... An MRI at the local hospital would be much more dangerous. Also, hydroxy vehicles would be a pretty low risk (safer than gasoline, if people understand how to handle it). Even LENR is proved with over 120 successful replications world-wide to be pretty harmless... So i would suggest that the reasons these things and many more like energy from plasma / ball lightening are not being studied by the mainstream scientific community (...although LENR is studied in other countries outside the US) has nothing to do with possible safety dangers to society as a whole... But because they are risky to certain elements of society who wish to remain in their current positions of power... That's human nature. And unfortunately, it is also "dark human nature" for those in power to do whatever they can get away with to hold on to that tremendous power and wealth.

Our challenge is to limit the possibilities of what they can get away with, strip them of their favorite tactics, and defeat them via grass roots. This is why the Open Source model will succeed

Its a tough challenge, but the rewards are worth it. For when a great new F-E technology finally emerges.. It won't crash the stock markets, it won't cause anarchy, it won't "destroy civilization" or cause armageddon. What it will do is slowly change the paradigm to that of plenty, from that of scarcity. It wont happen overnight... And at first you can bet those in power will find a way to "get a piece of the action" somehow, too... But when too many people know about it, that's the best they will be able to get away with.

But it appears that it may not happen at all unless WE in the Open Source Energy movement make it do so.

In the 1950's and '60's; the Civil Rights movement ended Segregation. In the 70's, the Women's Rights and Ecology movements both succeeded greatly in their causes. They were all up against hugely powerful opposition.... They did it by changing public opinion; using Grass Roots Activism... The one thing they are most scared of. 

If 100,000 of us tell 10 of our friends, family, neighbors, and co-workers about the possibilities of Free Energy... Thats 1,000,000 who will now know. If they tell 10.. That's 10 million. Then soon it's 100,000,000 who know the truth... And it can then no longer be suppressed. And once it's not suppressed, then its a "done deal"... It can't be stopped, because the light of day is shining on it and everyone will demand it.

So bring us the working F-E device, and we will do the rest  

[PaulLowrance]

Open sourcing is the way, but the method of getting it out in the public is still up for discussion.

If ones goal was to prevent global "free" energy, then just think about it for awhile. Having someone murdered is the last resort!  They take a risk of being caught even when using the best *expensive* hit-men.

Here's what I came up with from almost day one of being in this "free energy" community, and every time I mention this there are people who try their best to counter act what I say. The obvious and smart answer is the flood these forums with thugs. In fact, one person who spends full time could have dozens of user names posting here using multiple ISP's. There is no way Stefan would know.

So if they want to hush a "free energy" design that they think might be legit (not a fake from one of their forum guys) then they simply ignore the person. You'd be amazed how most people are followers.

They could ignore those who are not part of the team, and support their own people. How often do you see people saying, "Just build it!"  So legit people build it, doesn't work, surprise surprise, get burnt out, never want to return to the "free energy" community.

Why would a legit person want to replicate a device that everyone's ignoring, when everyone is swarmed around another device? "Build it, Build it, Build it!"  LOL

It's a perfect flawless 100% legal plan! They don't need to break any law. They just bamboozle you. Why take a chance on something so important as global "free energy?"  For years I have *begged* people in this industry PLEASE IGNORE DESIGNS BY PEOPLE WHO ARE UNWILLING TO SHOW PROOF!  I, for example, have offered to show my entire diode array setup to any professor. I've shown every detail, part numbers, everything.


PL

[Doctor No]

Is that true? If so then it's a day to celebrate because then and only then will someone have a chance at getting the "grand smoking gun" (a self-running "free energy" machine that produces usable amounts of power) into public hands.


I would predict the person wouldn't even make it to the patent office.

Already done!  They've tried scare tactics on me and countless others from Bruce DePalma to Bedini.



PL

The true over unity machines can not go into public hands, sorry.
I mean about machines which will have cost about 3-4 EUR/ 1 Kw of invested power.
But there are 2 points behind it:
1. They don^t need not only fuel, but also maintenance.
2. They don^t change its structure during the work time, thanks to renewable energy of tachyons,
which rebuilds internal structure of engine.
Can You really not imagine what could be when some idiots become in own hands such a machine that can in a moment unlimited amount of energy to produce?
Pleasee see on my blog: with Day of Cosmonautics :
http://ludzie.playmobile.pl/blog/entry/128107/With+Day+of+Cosmonautics.html
Original in russian to Vladymir V. Putin: Ð"ень КосмонавÑ,ики 11.04.08 (sent 1 year earlier with additional materials in top secret operation).
It was very long time ago.....

Doctor No
http://ludzie.playmobile.pl/doctor+no

[PaulLowrance]

The true over unity machines can *not* go into public hands, sorry.

Global "free energy" is inevitable, sorry. IMO the odds of one person being able to market a "free energy" machine before the exact replication designs are in public hands is highly unlikely. To be blunt, they'll be stopped. So a person should first give away the designs to make a "free energy" machine, and they should very careful how they give away such designs, as there's a good chance that places such as "free energy" forums are heavily watched-- be *very* careful and *smart*, please! After the designs have successfully made it into public hands, then it's too late to stop global "free energy," and therefore it's fine for anyone to market such machines. Another possibility is for a large company to market a "free energy" machine. It would be difficult to stop a company.

...

Anyhow, I'm beginning to see more and more unusual posts that appear to be taking the next step, which is scare tactics such as suggesting that "free energy" is dangerous, or it will destroy the world economy.  These are the most ridiculous and pathetic statements ever. How dare these thugs take it to that level. Any good economist will tell you that the economic system always adapts to change. Of course any great change brings about *growing pains!* Growth is painful. Would you deny your wife the right to have birth?!?!  As far as "free energy" being dangerous, it depends on the technology. Capturing ambient thermal energy that exists in all matter all the time is 100% safe, it is *not* nuclear!

PL