IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on February 10, 2006, 08:32:06 PM
________________________________________
A thanks to Lindsey for giving us the opportunity to share his correspondence with Steve Marks.  I consider it a privilege to be able to share ideas with someone who has made such a remarkable achievement. 

One of the things that impressed me about the video of the demonstration was SM?s statement that the source of the energy for his device was the Earth?s magnetic field.  This must sound implausible to anyone not acquainted with Tesla?s work.  If you want to gain the confidence of investors surely it would be better to give them some BS about zero point energy?  I must confess that when I first read about the Earth?s magnetic field as a source of energy in connection with the Hendersholt device the idea seemed so ridiculous that I dismissed Hendersholt as a crank.  Recently I was compelled to give the idea some serious consideration when I read a testimony from one of the Disclosure Project insiders who claimed to have worked on a project that involved using electromagnetic devices to extract energy from the Earth?s magnetic field.  The real clincher for me was reading a declassified document by Wilbert Smith, a Canadian government engineer active in the 1950s.  You can read it here: http://www.presidentialufo.com/top_secret_text.htm .  In this top secret memo Smith outlines the areas of study for a project to develop a new magnetic technology using energy from the Earth?s magnetic field and using clues from crashed UFOs.   What makes this disclosure so sensational is that the fact that the Earth?s magnetic field as a source of energy has been one of the most zealously guarded secrets of the 20th century yet here it is acknowledged by a person in a position of authority.  Even today you will not read of this fact on the Internet or in fringe publications. Instead, all the so called experts on free energy like Bearden,  Puthoff, and Lindermann go on about ZPE or aether without being able to produce a workable device to back up their ideas.

I would like to discuss some ideas put forward by SM and others on how the geomagnetic field can be a source of energy.  In the January 31st letter SM talks about the Earth generating electricity through it?s rotation but this is not how I understand the dynamo theory of the geomagnetic field.   This theory explains the existence of the geomagnetic field as being caused by the Earth?s metallic core having a current induced in it by motion through the Suns? magnetic field which in turn creates a magnetic field around the Earth whose poles roughly coincide with the axis of rotation.  There is said to be electricity generated in the atmosphere when the electrically neutral solar wind, consisting of protons and electron meets the geomagnetic field and positive and negative charges experience a force perpendicular to the field lines so that an electric current flows around the equator.  I have my doubts about both theories.   According to physicist Bibhas De the magnetic field has mass and inertia making it like a fluid.  Thus the Earth?s rotation causes it?s magnetic field to spiral round as in a vortex.  This magnetic vortex could be regarded as a wound spring that stores the kinetic energy of the Earth?s rotation.  I am 99% confident that the following explanation of how the geomagnetic field can be source of energy is true and is known by people in authority.  It isn?t taught in our schools because the implications are pretty scary!  Evidence is mounting that the source of the Sun?s energy is it?s magnetic field, that there are a multitude of magnetic poles on the Sun and that spiral magnetic waves from these poles heat the exterior atmosphere of the Sun.  As there is no nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun it means that there is a lot less EM radiation directly reaching the Earth than our scientists believe.  What does reach the Earth is packets of magnetic energy ranging from subatomic size particles to UFO size balls of light.  These are somehow transmuted into heat, light and other EM radiation when they reach our atmosphere.  There is so much of this solar energy stored in the geomagnetic field in the ionosphere that it could replace our entire current fossil and nuclear fuel needs many times over without unbalancing the ecosphere.

The only self-running free energy devices known to work, work on the same principle as the Roschin and Godin version of the SEG. (See http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/godin-roschin.htm).  My interpretation of how they access this magnetic energy as follows.  These devices use magnet assemblies that rotate around a vertical axis to create a vortex magnetic field, which extends as a beam into the ionosphere, where it collects magnetic particles, and is reflected back to the device in an amplified form.  My original interpretation of the Steve Marks device was as a variation of this type. In the letter of the second January 31st post SM writes of combining out of phase AC sources in a transformer and observing anomalous high energy spikes.  From these remarks I deduced that in his device the two coils wound around the torroid are fed with out of phase AC and their magnetic fields experience both constructive and destructive interference so that the resulting magnetic field rotates with an angular velocity that is controlled by the phase shift and frequency of the applied AC.  In order to clarify what is happening it might help to imagine the changing magnetic field around a straight wire caused by AC.  Then we could imagine the combined magnetic field when there is another straight conductor fed with AC parallel to it.  Perhaps it would be helpful to model the device as a transmission line.  The animated gif in the archive of the SM device does show a rotating magnetic field but it appears to be created by switching DC through segments of the coil.  I wonder if SM can confirm that the magnetic field of the actual device does rotate as shown in the animation.

Stefan has speculated why the device still functions when it is turned over at 90 degrees but not when it is turned 180 degrees.  I suggest that when turned at 90 degrees it still bounces a signal off the ionosphere, although obliquely.  When turned over 180 degrees the magnetic vortex would be turning in the wrong direction and the device would not function.  In order to confirm this hypothesis it would be helpful if someone could confirm that the Adams motor only achieves resonance when turned in one direction.

I have read reports from other experimenters who have observed that transient spikes are associated with overunity but I did not take it seriously until I read SM?s letters.  M Charley has posted plans for an overunity battery charger that exploits the very transients that engineers normally try to filter out.  You can see the SEBCAR project here: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:SEBCAR.  You can read Lindsey Mannix?s comments on the project here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sebcar/message/186 .  Could these transients be evidence of the connection between electricity and the geomagnetic field, and has anyone done any research into their origin?

Finally is the output of the SM device electricity?  There have been other free energy devices like the Testatika and Floyd Sweet device whose output was ?cold electricity? or magnetic current as it could more accurately be called.  A peculiar property of this magnetic current is that it makes a bright flash of light when there is a short circuit.  The demonstration of the SM device in the video does show a bright flash of light when SM makes a short circuit but it has a flame like quality.  Is this a normal feature of high voltage, high frequency?  Where does this RF component come from?

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on February 15, 2006, 07:06:42 PM
________________________________________
There should be no mystery about the magnetic pulse from nuclear explosions that destroys electronics.  This is simply due to charges being ejected radially from the centre of the explosion creating a spherical magnetic wave that is both a scalar potential wave with a longitudinal component in the direction of propagation.  See the paper by Monstein and Wesley.

The exploding TV set sounds like a ball lightning explosion to me.  I imagine that ball lightning is a spinning magnetic torus at whose poles field lines converge into vortices.  Since the torus has a vertical axis the funnel like vortices extend into the earth and up to the ionosphere.  Such a vortex would act like a water going down a plug hole and pull magnetic energy from the geomagntic field at this high altitude.  I believe that the vortex is said to be implosive because it creates a centripedal force that pulls objects into it's centre, thus accounting for metal objects being pulled towards the TV set.  I believe that Tornados recieve most of their energy from the geomagnetic field in the same way as ball lightning rather than colliding warm and cool air currents as the textbooks teach.  I must say the prospect of the public being given access to the source of energy that powers tornados is rather worrying, especially in the light of exploding TVs!  Lets hope that the Adams motor, if it is ever finished, is no more likely to explode than the average TV set.

I have worked it out on paper and I have concluded that Stephan is right when he proposed that if one had a coil divided into four segments and supplied each with AC phase advanced by 90 degrees consequetively then you would indeed obtain a rotating magnetic field as shown in the animated giff: http://harti.com/coil/toroid_gen.gif .  All four coils would have windings in the same direction and there would always two north poles and two south poles opposed to each other so that the field lines would extend outside the coil. The magnetic field would not move smoothly but would pulse on and off as it rotates.  One could minimise the discontinuities in the field by using eight, sixteen, thirty two etc coils.  The SM video does show a coil bursting into life when a permanent magnet is placed on it, so does this mean that the device always needs to have magnets attached to it to function?

What I have described above is a straight forward engineering task but judging by SM's comments setting up the control unit is a black art that involves close attention to the waveforms on the scope.  I don't yet fully understand what he has written in his last letter but I get the impression that the rotating magnetic field he detected using a compass is not actually engineered into the device but is an accidental result of superimposing waveforms.  This would make the device hideously difficult to reproduce which maybe is just as well.


Not_a_mib is right when he says of such devices that there is a 'Changing the physical constants of the space, such as lightspeed, permittivity, and permeability', 'zero net heat production or absorption, and 'weight loss'. These are all properties of vortex magnetic fields.  Such fields account for 'cold fusion' being able to overcome the coulomb barrier and the cooling of air around vortical storms like hurricans and tornados.  They really are recycling ambient heat for an energy gain.

Another interesting possibility we should examine is the peculiar basketweave coil winding in the Hendershot device.  In principle this could act in the same way as the windings of the cadeuceus coil.  Assuming the the radial magnetic field around the conductors in these coils moves with the currents then where wires cross at right angles there would be interference between these moving magnetic filds which either could produce constructive and destructive interference making a moire type pattern or else there would be vortices produced at the intersection of the wires.  Maybe someone should try an air coiled torroid with a cadeuceus winding and a bifalr secondary to collect magnetic current.

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on February 19, 2006, 08:49:47 PM
________________________________________
I can understand Steven's dissapointment at the feedback he has received from this forum, but all I can say in my defence is that it will take some time to absorbe the information provided because much of this is new to to me. Although it may seem as if I am not putting this information to good use I can assure him that what I have read so far has been a revelation and I hope that he continues to share his ideas and experience with us.

I did not consult the textbboks referred to because I expected that these were engineering texts that would not discuss the physics of what is happening in any detail.  I did know about the current surge in thermionic valves when they are first switched on but I never gave it much thought untill I read Steve's letters.  Now I suspect it may be the same phenomenon used in the Correa's PAGD tube.

There are parallels between the SM device and RM Santilli's 'Magnegas'.  Magnegas ought to be the first overunity product available to the public but after ten years we still cannot fuel our cars with fuel made from water among other things.  Apart from the machinations of the oil companies progress is held up by the scepticism of potential investors because Magnegas seems to defy the law of physics as they are presently understood.  From the sceptics point of view the onus ought to be on advocates of overunity to provide information that could be used to  experimentaly verify the reality of the phenomenon.  However Santilli is a scientist and he has presented experimental data that could enable others to verify the reality of 'magnecules' by repeating his experiments.  There are other experiments published by Professor Kanerev and the cold fusion guys that ought to prove the reality of overunity.  So, why cannot SM follow their example by publishing information about his research in an engineering journal without actually giving away propriety information?

I think that Kosh has really hit the nail on the head with the Electrical Soliton Oscillator.  The URLs are here:

http://people.deas.harvard.edu/ ~donhee/MTT_2006_Ricketts_Li_Ham.pdf
http://people.deas.harvard.edu/~donhee/so_ims.pdf

The concept of the Soliton derived from the observation that a single wave in water would sustain the same velocity and wavelength in a channel where it narrowed, contrary to expectations.  This is what is meant by non-linear.  Perhaps a non linear transmission line could be an acoustic horn for instance.  In the example of the Electrical Soliton Oscillator (ESO) non linearity in impedance is provided by inserting varacters in an electrical transmission line.  An amplifier with non linear transfer characteristics starts the oscillation by amplifying background noise untill a train of unidirectional voltage pulses are transmitted along the line.  These are fed back to the input to make a self sustaining closed loop with the amplifier making up for losses in the line.  Some interesting characteristics of the ESO is that the frequency of the pulses is dependant on their amplitude and that pulses of different amplitude and frequency can collide.  Also various modes are available depending on the frequency of the pulses and the diameter of the circular transmission line.

This does sound very much like SMs accounts of how his device functions.  The torroid should be regarded as a two wire transmission line formed into a coil although I cannot see how it could have non linear impedance along it's length.  Maybe the core material provides non-linearity.  The rotating magnetic field can easily be explained by the fact that only short sections of the core are magnetised at one time so that field lines curve back through the space outside the coil.  The difficult thing to understand is how the SM device achieves overunity when the ESO does not.  Could permanent magnets in combination with the coil be the key to providing overunity?

Much of what I have written may seem like irrelevant theoretical ramblings but I do believe that I have provided a coherent explanation for all overunity phenomenon including those exploited by the SM device.  This kick that is supposed to occur when a current is first drawn through a conductor could be explained by the momentary bunching up of electrons in conductors in a torroidal formation like Ken Shoulder's charge clusters. Such an electronic vortice could bounce a signal off the ionosphere as I have explained previously.

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on February 19, 2006, 09:15:10 PM
________________________________________
OK, before I learn how to use an oscilloscope there is no harm in trying to understand the physics behind overunity which in my opinion is derived entirely from the Earth's magnetic field. 

My hypothesis is that the Earth's magnetic field is energised in the ionosphere by a source of magnetism from the Sun.  In other words it is a form of solar energy available 24/7.  Oddly enough a US government agency has provided graphic proof that the Earth is receiving packets of magnetic energy from the Sun by providing video footage of the so called 'NASA UFOs' for the public.  What is shown in the videos are shots of spinning balls of light swarming around both Soviet and NASA spacecraft.  One particularly memorable shot was taken from a satellite looking down at the Earth with these balls of light showering down into the atmosphere where they disappeared with a flash of light.  Do a Google search for 'Secret NASA Transmissions' to find a source of the videos.  It is worth buying a legitimate copy in order to get a good view of the phenomenon rather than using Bittorrent.

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on March 01, 2006, 05:58:56 PM
________________________________________
Hi Folks

I have been reviewing your replies and giving this some thought in the meantime.  Here are my conclusions so far.

According to Steve his device depends on a phenomenon that occurs when a current is first caused to flow in a conductor.  At this instant there is excess energy in the form of a ?kick? derived from the Earth?s magnetic field.  This ?kick? is not defined but it has been assumed that it is either a mechanical force (Lindsay) or an excess voltage (Kames).  According to Steve this phenomenon is ?common scientific knowledge? but I have never seen it referred to in mainstream scientific literature and neither have Kames or Stefan who are both science graduates.  However, it could be one of those Tesla discoveries that they don?t want you to know about.  Elvis Oswald may be on the right track when he suggested that this ?kick? may be the phenomenon exploited in Tesla?s ?cold electricity? experiments and single wire transmission of electricity proposal.  These developed from the observation that when high tension DC supplies were first connected to the grid there would sometimes be a luminous energetic discharge at the switch.  I refer you to a paper by C.P. Kouropoulos titled Classically Bound Electrons - EV?s, Exotic Chemistry, and ?Cold Electricity? obtainable here: http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/ Research/ColdElectricity.pdf . Kouropoulos develops further Tesla?s hypothesis that at the instant that a current flows there is a bunching of electrons.  According to Kouropoulos electrons can overcome coulomb repulsion and bind together by short range magnetic forces when their spins are opposed.  He also suggests that at the instant when a current is initiated such electron strings can form into spinning torroid formations close to the surface of conductors which decay leaving a vortex magnetic field.  Such electronic vortices are said to be found in the leading edge of simple electric sparks and according to Patrick Kelly at  http://www.geocities.com/captpjk/ Tesla was the first to discover that the electric spark receives energy from the Earth?s magnetic field.  But is this ?kick? something you can measure with an oscilloscope?  It seems to me that what is being received from the Earth?s magnetic field is not electricity but a form of magnetic current which may not register on an oscilloscope. 

Steve also refers to experiments where transients were generated when two out of phase AC sources are supplied to separate windings on a transformer and the combination of such transients may create a discernible magnified spike displayed on an oscilloscope but I wonder how this is connected with the phenomenon outlined above?  Are these transients induced in the transformer core by the rapid build-up and decay of a magnetic field, and if so how could this be a factor in the SM device with it?s air cored coil? Only experiment can tell.

There has been some speculation by Conwy and Stephan that the coil is divided into segments fed with phase shifted AC in order to create a rotating magnetic wave as in the Mollinez patent.  From Steve?s own comments and other sources it would seem more likely that the coil is a twin wire transmission line fed with unidirectional DC pulses from an amplifier that are regenerated at it?s input.  Kosh suggested that the device is related to the Electrical Soliton Oscillator shown here: http://people.deas.harvard.edu/~donhee/MTT_2006_Ricketts_Li_Ham.pdf .  I have searched the internet but I have not been able to find a reference to a non-soliton pulse oscillator using a linear transmission line so I assume that Kosh is probably right on this one.  Further support for Kosh?s suggestion comes from Steve himself when he noted that a compass needle would turn inside the coil and would accelerate after the device was activated.  Since the velocity of solitons is related to their amplitude I would expect that as the amplitude of each pulse increases with each circuit of the coil so would it?s velocity.  Also Steve wrote of the coil exhibiting modes depending on the relation between the distance between pulses and the coil circumference, and that multiple modes were possible at the same time as described in the Ricketts, Li, DePetro and Ham paper above.  A question that remains to be answered is in what way is the coil in the SM device non-linear.  Could there be varactors connected at intervals along the TL?  You might like to study this guide to Solitons and NLTLs for beginners: Solitons On a Nonlinear Transmission-line ( http://wug.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys303/303Exp/Soliton/Soliton.pdf ). This paper includes an introduction to simplified maths for Solitons with suggestions for experiments you could do.

According to the Ricketts, Li, DePetro and Ham paper above ?background noise? generated inside the ESO?s amplifier provides transients that develop into soliton waves.  Such transients in this ?background noise? could be derived from the environment such as lightning or cosmic rays but this ambient energy hardly makes the device overunity since the amplifier is required to compensate for system losses.  Nether the less, Steve insists that all that is require is to combine these transients to obtain energy from the geomagnetic field.  It seems to me that Steve knows more about his device than he is prepared to disclose, which is understandable really.  For instance why do the pulses have to circulate in the coil? Why are magnets attached to the coil? Why does the coil have an air core? Why does the coil not work when turned over?  In Kames excellent post of February 26 everything is coming together with some answers to these questions.  He points out that if a ferromagnetic core had been used the magnetic field induced in the coil by the DC pulses would be confined inside the core and the device could not interact with the environment.  With an air core only a sector of the coil containing a pulse would have a magnetic field induced in it making it like a virtual magnet rotating in a plane perpendicular to the coil?s axis.  The field lines of this virtual magnet would link it?s north and south poles in the space outside the coil.  If you accept Bibhas De?s proposition that magnetic field has mass then it would be subject to fluid dynamics and the resulting rotating magnetic field would form into a funnel-like vortex.  I know that this may sound presumptuous coming from someone who does not know how to use an oscilloscope but IMO it is this vortex that is collecting energy from the geomagnetic field rather than voltage spikes themselves.  Since there is no geomagnetic energy at ground level this spiral magnetic wave would have to reach high above the Earth?s surface but it cannot do so because it?s field would diminish with the square of the distance.  The magnets remedy this by breaking up this spiralling magnetic wave into pulses so that they cannot diverge.  The resulting laser-like magnetic beam shoots up 100km or so into the ionosphere and creates a track for the collection of magnetic particles that Tesla called ?neutrons?.  By ?neutrons? Tesla meant not the neutrons of modern science but rather magnetic particles of neutral polarity.  Check out the Mikell device at: http://www.fdp.nu/mikelldevice/thedevice.asp which also utilises a rotating magnetic field and magnet pulsing.  Learn the principles embodied in this device because it explains EVERYTHING; cold fusion, browns gas, pulse motors, discharge tubes, etc.  Don?t build a full size version of one of these because they are dangerous according Von Braun (http://groups.msn.com/VonBraunPhyiscs/).

Kames has some interesting ideas about how a secondary coil could collect energy from the TL.  I would expect that as current is drawn from the secondary the TL would become loaded and the amplitude of the pulses would diminish.  I would also expect that there would be feedback from the amplifier?s output to control the input bias and to prevent clipping of the pulses and their break-up and disorder.

Sorry for such a long post!