Chas Campbell free power motor

[sevich]

thanx Ash

I'll do my best to replicate Chas' wheel.

I feel a kind of sadness in the air that this perpetual motion mystery might be finally solved at last.......... we all like to be the first ...(DAM)   

IMO I guess once Chas' wheel is figured out, then that will create new avenues and branching out different O/U machines using simillar principles?

who's to know.....wait and see?

[Prophmaji]

The knowledge that the gravitation field of the earth is a polarized oriented gradient, and that the motions involved in the operation of a properly built wheel are non-linear with respect to that field make a positive outcome (concerning the making of any given good 'Bessler' type wheel) --- obvious. Vortexes would not be possible if this were not true. In interstellar terms as one example, think of all the places that vortexes occur, and you will find them only around gravitational fields. Specifically..only in the gradient areas. (Exception!!:or areas of powerful gradient energy, ie, electrostatic fields, etc. ie, across boundaries which have notable gradients and the function involves fluid dynamics. You then get the resultant vortex spin from the three aspect points of a given fluid field, ie, resultant of the frequential quanta aspects of the given field interactions.)

[Joh70]

"we all like to be the first"

Yes  ................... but keep going

1. maybe you will become a successful business man in that field.
2. I suggest, having low energy bills will last longer than a bit honor from the anonymous internet
3. And to be precise: Bessler was the first in 18th Century! And others have done it already (i saw one with my own eyes) and:
4. gravity powered devices are only the start point. Energy densitiy of gravity powered device are relatively low (although a hydrogen-powered car could be recharged with hydrogen produced by gravity-powered devices).

[wattsup]

@Ash and @Hum

When it rains, it pours.
OK. Both of you to your rooms.... lol
Actually, a nice spat clears the air doesn't it? Lucky guys.

@Ash

Don't go blaming Hum. He is our resident reality check and it will take lots more than that to get him off this forum.

This is the problem. When you go to do an OU investigation like on Chas' device, you have to go there with a totally objective mind-set.

If you measure voltage and amperage at the PM and the Generator. If it works, it works. And if it doesn't, it doesn't. End of story #1.

In your case, you are talking RV, pulse, now you're talking air-conditioner clutches (do you know the load it will add to the PM - ouch), and the sort. What you are not talking about is the simplest questions of all. So let me put it in the simple and direct questions.

1) Did you measure the voltage and amperage at the PM inlet?
2) If 1 is Yes. What are the values?
3) If 1 is No. Why?

4) Did you measure the voltage and amperage at Generator outlet?
5) If 4 is Yes. What are the values?
6) If 4 is No. Why?

7) If 4 is Yes. Please describe how you took your measurments.

Look, if Chas' device does not produce OU as it is, no modifications, no RV, no pulse, straight loaded, then WE NEED TO KNOW THIS, AS IT IS. End of story.

The rest of the story we can all elect to pursue or not, given the straight answers. No fluff, required. People need to know this in order to take a decision or not on replication, based on facts.

Now if Chas' device does not work as proposed and you have taken it upon yourself to do as much as possible with the RV method to help him "potentially" bring it to OU status, then that's OK. But Cripes, don't beat around the bush because this just pisses people off.

So what we need are the true blue facts, nothing else. YES or NO.

[wattsup]

@GraViTaR

I know you are seeing it this way but here it is again.

If A and D share the same axle, and B and C share the same axle, then,
all that's happening is A and D are turning B and C.

Now if A is off center to D, then they cannot share the same axle and your picture is wrong. In this case if there is one axle for A and one axle for D, and A is off center to D, and D is required to help turn A, then at one point there will be a drag to equalize the off-center of what is used to turn A using D. This drag will stop the wheel.

@Prophmaji

It's a question of having the wheel turn and using the turning motion as leverage to lift the left side. From 9 to 10 o'clock it is important to push the ball to the right as mush as possible, but not too much to lose height at 1 o'clock. Also at 7 o'clock, the curve starts the motion rightwards before it would do so if it was straight. This advanced ball movement has to be timed in a way that its combined maximum momentum or all moving balls can be attained without creating a drop in the inertia of the wheel. The later would also then be a function of the wheel to ball weight ratio.

In my wheel design, the wheel itself was brought to a professional wheel balancing device that turns the empty wheel a 500 rpm or more to identify the imbalances. These imbalances are then corrected and re-tested until the wheel has a off balance of less than 1 gram. Then you add you other components which are perfectly balanced also. This ensures that the wheel is perfectly balanced and on the off balance of the ball shifting weight can then act upon it. Centuries ago, I don,t think there was any high level balancing in this manner and wheels were made with limited capabilities in precision placement.

Your spoke wheel is probably not balanced also. Then the tubes would  have to be placed at "exactly" the identical 8 positions, and this will be difficult to do. You are better off designing the tubes with identical 90 degree holding rods to then be placed together then added to the wheel as a whole, not individually. Otherwise your balance risks being off. Once you have a perfectly balances wheel, with the tubes, you will see the true motion, or lack of motion that you could not see before because of all the interfering forces, and you can adjust accordingly, but always know that if you move one, you have to move eight.

True Perpetual Wheels are a challenge in that they use no magnetic or other assist. Although one can spend a lifetime working on this, one can spend a lifetime triming a Bonzai Tree. In both cases, you are left with a nice looking structure that you can feel proud off, working or not.