Chas Campbell free power motor

[hartiberlin]

Hi Ash,
if you will be at the 15th again at Chas?s house,
then please try to ask him to put all the ball in each holes
and see, if it starts itsself rotating.
Probably it will not do it.

Maybe he has found an effect where:

E kin= 0.5 x m x v^2 is not equal to E pot= m x g x h

So if a mass converts its stored energy due to its height h
and falls and  hits a target,
then maybe it has more energy than E pot = m x g x h
predicts ?
This is probably what user zero has pointed out.

[Humbugger]

"Yes, Humbugger, you are wrong.
If you stop the wheel, when the next ball has come up at the left side,
it has enough time to run out to 4x.
Then always one ball is at the right side and it can then start the wheel again."

Bah,  Humbug!

ONLY CUPS WHICH ARE BELOW THE FEEDING RAMP AND ABOVE THE DUMPING OFF RAMP CAN HAVE A BALL IN THEM.  IF THE DISTANCE BEWEEN CUPS IS BIGGER THAN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE RAMPS, THERE WILL BE TIMES OF NO BALLS.

There will be some period in which there is no ball on the outer wheel!  This is because the lower ball receptacle has dumped its ball onto the lower ramp, but the next receptacle available for picking up a new ball (that we can assume is there waiting)...that empty receptacle has not yet arrived in place to receive a new ball from the upper feed ramp.  So, for a moment, no balls on the outer wheel.

To keep always a ball on the wheel at 4:1, you would need to accellerate the wheel suddenly to infinite speed as soon as the lower ball left the wheel so that the new receptacle would be there to pick up the new ball just as the lower ball left its receptacle.  Forget about the balls on the ramps...assume they are always there waiting.

This is not wrong.  Stefan is simply pretending he doesn't understand.  That is the only possible explanation.  I refuse to believe he is stupid and I know it is correct and I believe I have explained very clearly.

[ltseung888]

Dear Ash,

I have attached Version 1.5 of the Chas Campbell Gravity Wheel document.  It is modified from the TPU discussion document. 

I included discussions with Chinese Officials from 3 different Cities and their consultants.

I shall modify and create new versions as we learn more.  Hope the existing information is useful to you and Mr. Campbell. 

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung

[Humbugger]

Please, before everyone leaps fully back into the land of total speculation and fantasy...

CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW THERE COULD BE ANY BALLS ON THE "BIGGER" WHEEL?[/b]

[mr2]

What if each ball had metal inside, and there was magnets placed stationary at 9 o'clock pulling the balls more inwards to the centre of hub?
The balls on the Campbell device are inside tubes that has plenty of room to move the balls at least a couple of cm.. maybe enough to make it run... you could also have magnets on the outer perimeter.. pressing the balls outwards.. that maybe could change the balancepoint up to 5 cm...

If the tubes was square instead of round, you would have more 'travel-distance' horisontally...

Just one thought... don't know if this would work..