Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[sparks]

  @Ergo


   First off thanks for the inspiration we all need a kick in the ass sometimes.  Keep it coming.  Try this one on for size.  Say that by the same mechanism that creates a hurricane we create a hurricane on a relativistic level.  The energy of a hurricane comes from the low pressure area created by a vertical column of air which is driven by the temperature difference between the cold upper atmosphere and the warm ocean.  This is not a huge gradient,  just a few degrees per vertical meter.  The atoms of the atmosphere start to migrate towards this field gradient.  Of course this is an example of inertial change in a spinning inertial frame of reference, so the Coriolis force raises it's mighty head. (Frame dragging and you don't even need black hole gravity to do it.)    The air molecule currents apparently veer off lets say to the right in reference to the equator. So now there is a spin component to the currents trying to fill in the hole.  The spin around the low pressure area stores the energy of the low pressure gradient flow instead of just filling the hole.  This spin also protects the low pressure area in a sense so it can keep building in power.  TPU same thing but replace atom with electron- pressure with charge.  Hot to cold gradient with external circuit draw.

[Ergo]

Are you familiar with Bedini's COP > 1 systems ?  If you are not, it might be good to examine their operation.
They are free energy, and anyone can build them.

OK, you show me one single Bedini motor being overunity confimed beyond doubt.
Some real proof this time. Not your own beliefs or hear saying. I talk about rock solid proof....

Well, there is none. Do you know why?
Simply because no Bedini motors is overunity.
There have been many replications but none have been successful.

[Ergo]

I don't understand this  part. . . you seem to be ignoring the steepness of the gradient (dV/dT). Sharp gradients are already known to violate the second law of thermodynamics.  A square wave has a sharper gradient than a sine wave.

No, you don't understand me. The harmonic content is an expression on how sharp the square is compared to a sine wave.
Usually when comparing AC voltages, the regular square have a harmonic content ten times the sine wave.

But it still doesn't matter whether you use sine waves or square waves, it's still just voltage and current.
There is no magic going on when feeding square waves to a coil.
But I can understand people believing in this because it looks "mysterious".

Sharp gradients are already known to violate the second law of thermodynamics.

Here we go again. You show me one single proof on sharp gradients violating any thermodynamics law.
Hey, c'mon. Give a link to a real study in this matter that prove what you say.
Well, you can't because there is no such study. It would be a waste of time because there is nothing going on.

[Ergo]

So why can't you make a magnetic potential rotate?

Yes, you can, if you use a mechanical force, like in a motor.
Apply the flux from rotating physical magnets on a shaft.

But if you apply current to your static wiring, the magnetic field will immediately
surround the wires and also be conducted throung the core if you chose to have one.
You cannot have it to rotate, it's being static in the same place as the wiring is wound.
Even if you have multiple coils wired onto the core, it's still static in each wiring.
It doesn't move. It couldn't move unless you could make the wiring jump around by itself.
Don't come and talk about frequencies and other pseudo scientific explanations.
Any waveform is immediately present when applied, there is no delay, no rotation.
It doesn't matter what you try. It will be static as long as the wiring is static.

There you have it. No rotating field is possible in a static coil or transformer.
If you still claim rotating fields is possible in a static unit (TPU) then you don't have a clue what you talking about.

[Feynman]

Ergo:  I appreciate your thoughts since you appear to be highly educated in conventional EM theory. . . but I feel like you are ignoring certain experimental facts, as well as the implications of quantum electrodynamics (broken symmetry, assymetrical reguaging, etc). There are have been many replications of Bedini motors with overunity using a two battery system.

Here is your reference :

As stated, strong gradients are an area already known and recognized to violate the second law of thermodynamics, and not much is known about them, either theoretically or experimentally. For confirmation, see Dilip Kondepudi and Illya Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, Revised and Corrected, 1999, p. 459.