Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[BEP]

@sparks

My post about the small toroid being identical to devices used in flights during the cold war was a comparison to betatrons not klystrons. Klystrons were used but that was during conventional electronic warfare. The items I mentioned are strictly an offensive weapon. Klystrons are just whopping powerful tubes, great for jamming. They won't kill landline commo or wipe out circuits at least not normally.

Never heard of a klystron used for receiving but it might work.

I believe the small toroid is nothing more than a small TPU used to provide the right fields to the larger portions.

[Macmep_L]

Hello.

That is the first draw of ПÐ'А, all story here:
http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php?topic=160.msg5448#msg5448

Then... come up second draw, but not from this guy ;-))))
He says so much snow and he can't open garage door for make pictures that device, but before
he is very often used it like battery charger and mig welder! Not stick, like mig welder! ;-))

[giantkiller]

You're bang on, Sir! Notice how the leads going into the center are parallel with the outer small awg windings! This is part of the feedback that insures the triggering.

@sparks

My post about the small toroid being identical to devices used in flights during the cold war was a comparison to betatrons not klystrons. Klystrons were used but that was during conventional electronic warfare. The items I mentioned are strictly an offensive weapon. Klystrons are just whopping powerful tubes, great for jamming. They won't kill landline commo or wipe out circuits at least not normally.

Never heard of a klystron used for receiving but it might work.

I believe the small toroid is nothing more than a small TPU used to provide the right fields to the larger portions.

[sparks]

  @BEP

     Tube filaments suffer from a lack of free electrons.  The workforce needed to supply free electrons is well known.  A copper conductor does not suffer from a lack of free electrons they are right there on the skin of the conductor.  Any photon exchanges with the electron cloud are converted to electron acceleration whereas in most mass the photon is absorbed exciting the electron into the free state and reemitted when the electron falls back into the bound state.  The photon is just absorbed and readmitted by the electron orbital jump.  When a free electron absorbs a photon it is accelerated.  The acceleration emits photons.  If these photons are captured and recycled the current or amount of electrons accelerated is more efficient.  If the resonant cavities are receiving and recycling photons then the current should build in the core of the accelerator.  The bandwith is a problem because as the current grows in speed different frequency photons are emitted.  So if you are tuned in on a gigahertz scource and the core current velocity increases the resonant cavities are unable to capture the emitted photons.  This is a good thing as far as safety is concerned.  If the cavities are calculated so as to capture hgher frequency photons as the current is accelerated then there is more efficiency involved.  Especially if these cavities are also receiving harmonics of the fundamental vibration.  By the time you get to stages down the current pipe things are moving right along.  The big accelerators suffer from not collecting the electron photon transmissions in the core.  They just keep pumping and pumping and leaking and leaking.

[electric777]

Awesome!! 

Has anyone tried replicating the Chauncy Britten "Atmospheric Electrical Generator"  ?

http://www.rexresearch.com/feg/britten.htm

Most interested in devices which do not have any moving parts: Tesla Magnifying Transmitter, Peter Markovich's ATREE, Lester Hindershot Reciprocative Oscillating Coils, etc...

Thank you,

electric777