Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[Prooksius]

why not just use multi stranded(litz-) wire where each strand is insulated?

Because in this case anyway a lot of heat will be produced and not being removed from the wire

[rotaryfcg]

Because in this case anyway a lot of heat will be produced and not being removed from the wire

anyway we're diverging from the real problem here and that would be how to make that thing hot in the first place. give me a working unit, i'll handle the heat somehow

[MACEDONIA CD]

@proksius

is you  are new here  how you have made conclutions  for that 
tpu
YOU LIKE TO HELP THAT IS OK  but  whay do you tell as  how to byld this this setup

YOU LIKE TO SAY THAT WHATHER WHILL BE SPIN THAT IS TRUE BUT  TO TRANSPORT ELKTROMAGNET FILD  IN ITS SEFL  AND  MAKE SPIN  AND PRODUCED    DC VOLTAGE  IN  TO THE OUT COIL

but i like to point and  say  <words what s.m say>
NO MOVING PARTS 

WHAT YOU THING  IF I SAY THAT IM ABLE TO SPIN NO WHATHER  <
ONLY ELKTROMAGNET FILD  AUROND COIL
WHIT NO MOVING PARTS
THE POINT THAT  I SAY THAT IF I MADE TO SPIN ONLY ELKTROMAGNET FILD   TO MANY TIMES  ONLY IN ONE SECOND

SIMPLE TRANSFORMER IS SPIN ELKTROMAGNET FILD  ONLY ONE TURN  <WHIT DONT MATHERE WHAT   WHILL  BE FREK.THERE>
like this one hz  1000 spin moving elktromagnet fild  in ather out coil

[Grumpy]

anyway we're diverging from the real problem here and that would be how to make that thing hot in the first place. give me a working unit, i'll handle the heat somehow

Induction heating works better with ferromagnetic materials than copper or aluminum:

An induction cooker uses a type of induction heating for cooking. A coil of copper wire is placed underneath the cooking pot. An oscillating current is applied to this coil, which produces an oscillating magnetic field. This magnetic field creates heat in two different ways. It induces a current in an electrically conductive pot, which produces Joule (I2R) heat. It also creates magnetic hysteresis losses in a ferromagnetic pot. The former effect dominates; hysteresis losses typically account for less than ten percent of the total heat generated.[1]

It would be possible to build an induction cooker that worked with any conductive pot (for example, an aluminum or copper pot), whether or not the pot was ferromagnetic. But the increased permeability of an iron or steel pot makes the system more practical, by increasing the inductance seen at the drive coil and by decreasing the skin depth of the current in the pot, which increases the AC resistance for the I2R heating. [2] Most practical induction cookers are designed for ferromagnetic pots; consumers are generally advised that the cooker will work only with pots that will stick to a magnet. It would not be possible to build an induction cooker that worked with an electrically insulating (for example, glass or ceramic) pot under any conditions.

Probably some iron or steel involved (some have claimed intimate knowledge of the device and stated that iron delay coils were used and they are heated by eddy currents), or the current in the collector/load circuit is to great for the size of wire used.

Don't eddy currents require a changing magnetic field?

[sparks]

@Rotary

This much heat?      If each turn in the core copper is like a specific diameter of a unipolar generator then wouldn't there exist a voltage between the outer coils and the inner coils.  If the magnetic field is then sequentially compressed so as to mimic the rotation of the unipolar generator the tpu becomes a motionless electrical generator.  The magnetic field is not going to compress itself but perhaps a virtual spinning magnetic field will create a vortex magnetic field and create some relativity to a weak magnetic field generated by Earth's magnetichydrodynamics.