Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[Pegasus]

Anyone here can post a circuit schematic of a three phase inverter that one can drive from a variable frequency source?
Thank you.
Regards,
Pegasus

[gn0stik]

Any thing I do is about making this technology available..

The best way that I can .As I learn more, the methods will change...everybody do the same.. and we will have it.

A question that was put to me was . How long will it take for replicating people to be able to perfect the generator to the stage that Steven has?

I did not know the answer but i liked the challenge in the question..

Perhaps validation will work in their favor.

Im not answering about patents and people who want to copy....Its been covered many times..


Lindsasy

A few more months is my guess. Now that we have a foundation to work from, it shouldn't be that long. I've already heard about some great ideas to drop power consumption and then to close the loop. We would still need a starter battery with those suggestions.

Starting it with the swipe of a magnet... Not sure, on that one, it could be a while.

[Bruce_TPU]

Wow, alot of new folks.

I suggest every one read the NEW FAQ thread set up by Stefan.  Roberto has some good advice.

Also, Jason sent me a message to let everyone know that he has not dropped off of the face of the planet,   but is leaving town for the weekend.  BUT when he returns on Monday, he will be attacking the ECD head on.

Also, I will allow Jason to give you details, but he has alot to say to improve the controller, but not in a way you think.  He also has a lot to say about the frequencies and BEMF.  He also has a lot to say about his last tests.... LOL    I hope I wet your appetite..  Oh, and some of the doubters out there.... You are on the verge of being made believers very soon.  This ECD is revolutionary as you will see in due time.

So, replicate, STICK to Roberto's Circuit that WE KNOW WORKS, for now.  What we need some design circuits on, is for some good, cheap oscillators that will become the standard for replication.  We have three signal generator kits but they go up to only 100 KHz.  If someone can post a full TESTED circuit for these oscillators, that would help me and I think many others.

Thank you for your time,
Bruce

[c0mster]

Hi Cam,
many thanks for running this demo.

I hope you can work out the last bugs from your circuit.

Did you already see any superimposing waveforms like Jason posted ?

Yes, I could see the bulb barely glowing, but how much power was going into
the system then ?

Did you see any strange waveforms at all with your setup ?
Many thanks.

Stefan
To answer your questions
I know others are using mosfets but what I have found is as long as you can get a crisp square wave with a fast rise and fall time you get the best results, be it a spark gap, mosfet or npn transistor. I also found that 3amps seems to be a max amperage you want to use into the tpu, anything above this and the results are lessened. I pumped up to 8 amps with my darlington pair. As far as superimposing waves go yes I seen lots of noise and I scoped the transistor and seen it was being hit with a BEMF pulse which btw was not just a spike but was more square in nature about 65V. My am radio I have under the bench also picked up white noise from the tpu. I used my RV inverter to check the draw on a 12v bike battery and its 12 v at 3.3 amps to light the 40watt bulb full. Very efficient inverter. When I seen the bulb start to glow with the tpu I was using 5 amps at a frequency of 40k which seems to be a lower harmonic, testing with Jason confirms this. The bulb filament seem to glow white and actually looked blue in the camera. I spread out the wave form I was seeing the oscillation was roughly 2.2MHz with other waves around 1mhz. According to Otto?s document the scope shots matched. Today I will drive the trannies with a function genny instead of the 555 timer so I can fine tune the frequency and then adapt that to my 555 output. I use a copper screen around the tpu incase of RF burns, if you research RF burns you will see copper is used to protect persons from burns. As well I have a 10amp fuse on the battery but I think the wire will burn up before it hits that point.

I did try adding 2 frequencies and the amps jumped to 7 but the frequency on the second was fighting the first so I got less results. As well I have a floating ball compass in the middle of the TPU but did not see any spin yet. But we need 3 frequencies matched properly to achieve this. I will be tweaking and testing over the next few days and also constructing a mosfet driver setup. Cross your fingers, so far results show a very in efficient inverter but I am hoping once the frequencies are tuned and the amps to drive are adjustable we can get some positive results.

I would just like to say I don?t believe I seen Otto say he achieved OU and no one has actually measured draw vs output properly yet to verify the efficiency. My goal is to light the light to full brightness using a battery, not a mains power supply, I have been fooled many times in the past by bad mains grounds seeping 120v into coils and etc.

Once I achieve my goal I will post a video with detailed information showing the findings.         

Cam

[kokomoj0]

UEC meeting is arranged. 

I'm surprised you were able to get through with the recently increased sunspot activity.

"The French Underground"

The best way that I can .As I learn more, the methods will change...everybody do the same.. and we will have it.     

So now its time to change the process of what is already known and has already been done?   So they are working for you then?  As you learn more?  Why dont you just learn more from uec? After all they have several working units.

A question that was put to me was . How long will it take for replicating people to be able to perfect the generator to the stage that Steven has?

I did not know the answer but i liked the challenge in the question..

Perhaps validation will work in their favor. 

Yes perhaps!

Here is my question for uec:

When do we get to see a true rms test with the output DC rectified and loaded up, running through capacitor filtering with a scope attached to any input and another attached to the unfiltered and filtered output? 

Validation would be a good thing but i am sure there is some reason that you or they cannot or are unwilling to do that right?!!!

Im not answering about patents and people who want to copy....Its been covered many times.
Lindsasy 

Wow!  This site is full of patents that people are copying for experimentation purposes, i am so happy that you have come to jesus and decided that the "marks" free energy device deserves your respect while all the other inventors on this site do not.


To all you builders out here, if you have faith in this project by all means keep on trucking and go for it.   I do not want to kill your golden goose.   But to everyone, i would demand a true rms test as anyone can create short pulses and shove them into a light bulb to give the appearance of more power out than is actually there.

Remember power is in watts and watts happens over time so no matter how bright that bulb is that little spike has to be averaged over time and that is a common circuit for saving battery power when lighting an led.   I have built and used this same circuit myself.

You can do this very cheaply with a squarewave generator and an led.  give it say a 6 volt pulse with a width of 10 milliseconds.  As soon as the frequency is greator than 250 cycles it "appears" to be on all the time when in fact is is being switched on and off at high frequency.   This is just an example of why i ask for the rms test!!!  It will get rid of any high frequency pulses that can be used to falsify results.

In an LED it is the speed because your eye cannot see it flickering faster than 250 times per second.  For a light bulb the filament cannot cool off fast enough.

So far the closest anyone has truthfully come to accomplishing this is the creation of a "high q transformer".  (i can see the scalar weapons being pointed at me now!!) 

BUT on the bright side-----------

If I am wrong I will buy a case of any beer of your choice that marks or uec will never ever provide a fool proof test for you, simple as it is to do so!   (but i cannot wait to hear lindsays creative reason why not!)

For those of you who believe in this great go for it, i am not slamming anyone here, as far as uec is concerned "provide real evidence" that it works.  That is all i ask!  So far what you have provided for evidence that it works is garbage.  Think "scope" "rectified" "filtered output" "noninductive load"!!!  Then you will have my "positive" attention.

Lighting light bulbs, (frosted no less), running through an invertor  simply does not cut it for anyone who knows how easily this sort of thing is to fake.

For those of you who believe in this with all your heart and soul by all means keep on trucking ok!  This is a conversation for the most part between me and Mr Lindsay for the most part and not meant to discourage anyone here so please refrain from flaming me.

Those are the questions I have for Mister Lindsay and the unknown electrical club.