Solid state Bedini charger from John Peters

[Hoppy]

The point is that if the device works as claimed you should be able to detect the greater energy using genuine scientific method. In addition, you should be able to plug the out to the in and get it to accelerate itself, or at the very least keep on going and not slow down like what happens when you have a wheel and give it a push with your hands.

The point is Mike, the machine is not OU! I've already explained this to you in your own thread.I mean how can a transistor, a coil and a few other bits and bobs be OU. Any EE knows that, so why keep dwelling on this OU theme. Even Bedini stresses that his machines are not OU!

Hoppy

[shablol]

Guys , you  need to empty your glass before u can get more.. some of you  went to college and invested thousends of hours studying and experimenting so i understand where you come from.. but just consider that maybe just maybe all that is taught at school not all true maybe some one wants to lead you in the wrong way... maybe he is not telling all he knows  or he complicates thing in order for you to spend a life time trying to to find something or explore things but you got the wrong basic building blocks so the puzzle will never reveal itself...
you've got lost... , all this EE stuff some one wrote it that doesnt mean it is the only truth it is just that guys prespective point of view.
you need to find your point of view and think from the  start like you dont know anything, theres is alot more out there that isnt in any book ...
i dont know everything but i know that i dont know... get it? the problem with scientist is that they are sure they know exactly whats going on
and thats their biggest illusion , its not their fault , they were good boys and went to school and listened and learned and when they finished they were sure they got all the tools and all the facts , no one told them maybe or perhapes what you learned is true , so they are sure they are true
and their doomed because of their believes  to continue looking for answers but they will hit a wall that they will never be able to pass...

[mike3]

The point is Mike, the machine is not OU! I've already explained this to you in your own thread.I mean how can a transistor, a coil and a few other bits and bobs be OU. Any EE knows that, so why keep dwelling on this OU theme. Even Bedini stresses that his machines are not OU!

Hoppy

So then there's really no point but just fun, right? Because if it's not over-unity why does everyone like to claim it's "free energy" or whatever?

[Hoppy]

So then there's really no point but just fun, right? Because if it's not over-unity why does everyone like to claim it's "free energy" or whatever?

LOL - The penny's dropping then Mike!

Simply because they believe or have been led to believe it is!!!

As I said in the other thread, just relax a bit and enjoy building your first spinning wheel.

Hoppy

[john_bedini]

This is not a John Peters circuit, This is a test circuit for the patent to prove the device worked. This circuit is sitting in my lab at this very moment. The battery you're looking at is a 1951 Willard battery so where is John Peters Circuit to prove this is his.
John Bedini

Hi All,
here is a picture and a circuit diagram from John Peters,
who has designed a solid state Bedini Charger.
He says:


"In this solidstate circuit the radiant energy apears when charging the first capacitor bank, and after the big capacitor discharge to the battery, with the right timing pulses. That circuit consume miliAmps, the first blue capacitors are charged with only one wire from the transformer secondary and two diodes. No current from the secondary."