The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Conversation between two aliens

Alien A: ?Tseung has disclosed the secret of the Flying Saucer openly on the Internet.  The Earthlings will soon join us in different parts of the Universe.?

Alien B: ?Did you teach the secret to him?  How could he and Lee work out the secret?  How could they overcome the roadblock of Conservation of Energy that was set up for Centuries?  How could they free themselves from the dogma of Action and Reaction??

Alien A: ?Lee Cheung Kin was regarded as the Number One Genius on Earth.  We cannot keep all Earthlings in the dark for eternity.  This is bound to happen sooner or later.?

Alien B: ?We influenced the CIA or the Like to trick Tseung.  How could he survive?  We got thousands of debunkers to smear and discourage him.  How could he stand the pressure??

Alien A: ?He had two strokes.  May be that had something to do with it.  He could no longer feel pain, pleasure and pressure.?

[acp]

Discussion amongst the students.

Student A, Why do I always have to be student A? I want to be student C for a change who always has all the answers.

Student B, Shut the f*ck up and read your lines you whining ninny, You can't be Student C, you're too dumb to be student C, anyway I'm taking student C's place when he gets back from collecting the next bit of nonsense we are supposed to discuss for Tseung. I have a brilliant plan, I'm going to take all the cr*p from this thread and ram it down his throat, theres so much of it he won't be able to read his lines anymore! HaHa

Student D, Ha thats what you think. Student C really is cleverer than you two, hes f*cked off good, he can't stand discussing this cr*p anymore, Whats more, he told me its all bollocks, so I'm afraid your plan isn't going to work.

Student E Bla bla

Student F, Bla bla
Student G, Bla bla, F*ck this for a game of cards, Im not standing around anymore discussing cr*p without a pay rise.

[Koen1]

Dear Koen1,

It is nice for you to quote the cannon example.  In 1165, we deliberately do not use the action-reaction mechanism.  We spin the water bottle ? using the non-rigid body rotation mechanism.  It is a more advanced form of the spinning top.  That is why I insisted on doing the experiment.  You will experience no reaction when you release the water bottle.

Well first of all what "non-rigid body rotation mechanism" are you talking about?

Let's just assume we use a weight on a string, which we move by standing in one spot and pivoting around our central vertical axis, so that the weight that starts out hanging downward due to gravity slowly rises and gets pushed outward by the centrifugal force. Let's assume we do so with a constant accelleration untill we reach the speed at which the string holding the weight is perpendicular to the vertical axis of rotation. Now let's assume we let go of the string.
The reaction will be that all of a sudden the mass of the rotating system, which previously included the mass of the experimenters body plus the mass of the weight tied to the string, now loses the mass of the weight, and is left with only the weight of the body. The centrifugal pull that the weight exerted on the body also drops away suddenly, and that pull had a force at least equal to that of gravity, since the centrifugal force needs to be higher than gravity in order to lift to the horizontal string position. This centrifugal pull during rotation needed to be cancelled out by the experimenter, in order to keep him from falling over. So, the experimenter needs to lean in against the centrifugal pull while he is spinning himself and the weight around. When the experimenter lets go of the string, his situation will momentarily be off-balance. If the experimenter doesn't shift his weight correctly, he will fall over backwards, while still spinning. Also, with an equal rotational speed but less mass to have to move about, there should be a tendency to increase the rotational momentum of the body, at least momentarily, until balance is again re-established.
Have you ever player hammer-toss? Then you should know this.
I expect you'll come up with some vague dismissal again, making up a slightly different setup as you go along...

You must apply the right physics laws and explanations to the specific experiments.  Read and Study, Study, Study before you post.  I hate to make you look bad in an open forum.

Ach, it's very hard to look bad when the person trying to make you look bad keeps showing everyone what a nutcase he is...

But why do you still not answer the questions, nor give any good explanations?
Too busy with your fantasy discussions?

[Ben Waballs]

Student A: ?Someone is trying to flood this thread with useless stuff.  What can they gain by such tactics??
Student B; Shhh! Its our 'teacher' Tseung! He has ignored the valid real questions from people, and focuses only on the negativity. He is one very strange person.
Student A; Indeed he is!
Student B: He must have watched too many Bruce Lee movies, because that is the only place people talk like this.
Student A: But why so many people visiting the thread?
Student B: Everyone loves a train wreck. After this ridiculous thread, nobody will ever believe old Tseung again, if they ever did in the first place. He will disappear like jose escamilla did on the ats forums.
Student A: Wont somebody help him?
Student B: No, he is trying to manipulate people, at any cost, for his own ego, and people hate that.
Student A: Oh.

[ltseung888]

Discussion amongst Architecture Students

Student A: ?With the Infinite Energy Flying Saucer Technology, we essentially have the mechanism to defy gravity.  We can build unbelievable structures.?

Student B: ?The Flying Saucer itself can be the Home, the Office, the Car and the Plane.  All we need to build is the parking and enhancing structures.  We may not even need lifts as the residents can fly directly to their designated space.?

Student C: ?Adding more Flying Saucers may not add more weight as the Flying Saucers can turn on their anti-gravity mechanisms.  This is a big breakthrough in Architectural Concepts.  The cities of the future will be very different from that of today.?