The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I did a google search on the theory of the Flying Saucer and got over 50,000 hits.  I glanced over some of them.  So far, I have not found a single one that can explain the physics of the Flying Saucer to my satisfaction.

Your Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory started from:
(1) We are immersed in gravitational and/or electron motions fields.  If we can use such energy, we do not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

(2) A Pulsed Pendulum Leading Out gravitational energy

(3) A Pulsed Magnetic Pendulum Leading Out electron motion energy

(4) An unbalanced wheel is effectively a pulsed pendulum

(5) A pulsed balanced wheel has the similar effect as (2) but much more efficient

(6) The Newman, Bedini, Adams, 225 HP, Liang, Chao etc. inventions are essentially variations of (4) or (5).

(7) The Forever flying bottle experiment or the two balls hitting the two sides (one padded) of the silly spaceship scenario pointed to the possibility of producing thrust internally without the need to eject hot gases.  There is no violation of Newton's Third Law.

(8 ) The sketch in 1165 combines the Cosmic Energy Machine in (6) and the elements of (7) to produce the Flying Saucer.

Your total step-by-step theoretical approach is intriguing.  Every step obeys the known and existing Laws of Physics.  If we accept the use of parallelogram of forces in step (2), the rest are simple.  Omitting or non-acceptance of that step will create non-believers.  You and Lee might be elevated to a previously undreamed of status in Science.

My eleventh question is:
(11) Have you presented your total theory with the above outlined 8 steps to any established academic institutions yet?  If so, what are their reactions?

Dear Top Gun,

I always enjoy answering your intelligent questions.  Here is the answer to your eleventh question:
(11) Have you presented your total theory with the above outlined 8 steps to any established academic institutions yet?  If so, what are their reactions?

We have not presented to any established academic institution with the full 8 steps yet.  The plan is to have a standard presentation material in Chinese and train at least 6 good presenters first.  The training material will include not only the above 8 points but the economics material as well.  Without the out-of-the-box, Silicon Valley Mentality and Insult Training, promoting Cosmic Energy Machine and Flying Saucer Theories will be difficult.  This is being done.

We presented to Tsing Hua University (the MIT of China) in 2006 after we understood the first 5 steps.  The presentation was very well received.  But we made the mistake of not screening the 225 HP pulse motor team before taking them along.  That team turned out to be CIA or the Like.  Politics took over.  You can read the story in the previous posts.

This time, we are not taking any unscreened team to our presentations.  We shall also tell the participants about this forum but warn them that there are many debunkers, many non-physicists, many CIA or the Like agents and many jeerers.  They must use their physics knowledge to judge the posts.

[Ben Waballs]

"This time, we are not taking any unscreened team to our presentations.  We shall also tell the participants about this forum but warn them that there are many debunkers, many non-physicists, many CIA or the Like agents and many jeerers. "

Har. Sounds like he's a little peeved. Tell us Larry, this screening. Will your two personalities interview them first, to see if there is any sign of laughter? If they pass that test (and its damn hard we know) will you let them in?
Perhaps you could use hand puppets in your presentations, to demonstrate the different personalities and what they mean to you?
If the reaction of the public here to your 'ideas' is any indicator, I would strongly recommend tomato screens be put in place in front of your stage.

[gaby de wilde]

And you've even got poor Gaby convinced already. Poor fellow.

You should be happy he spends his time on your training.

[Pirate88179]

I spoke to student "A" today.  I looked him up on a database and decided to call and speak to him about all of this.  He told me some really interesting things.

First, he was concerned.  He told me he does not trust student "B".  He thinks that maybe the Chinese government has planted student "B" undercover to keep an eye on things.  He was also not so sure about student "C".  Based on student "C"'s background, he thinks this might be a plant from the CIA so the U.S. can keep an eye on things.

I asked him, almost jokingly, about student "D".  He told me there is no student "D".  He said, there used to be but, something terrible happened and he is not permitted to speak about it.

I can post student "A"'s phone contact information here if anyone else would like to speak to him.  His English is not very good, but, he can communicate ok.  He said he would not mind speaking to anyone from this forum.  He did caution that his phone lines are being monitored but, that is normal in China these days.

Bill

[Koen1]

You should be happy he spends his time on your training.

That makes just about as much sense as cereal killing...