The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Brushless motor, IC controller.
No secret.
HardDisk Motor.
Google Brushless motor

@brnbrade

I'm guessing you've concluded this from Lawrence's description, not the patent document, correct?  (unless you can read Chinese or could see more from those patent figures than I could). Brushless motors have been around a long time, so if that is what has been described, then it is very unlikely there would be a valid patent claim.  On the other hand, it could be there was some sort of improvement to a standard brushless design that somehow increases efficiency using gravity. 

From the previous description provided by Lawrence, I cannot see how a brushless motor or anything similar could be described as powered by gravity. An enhancement to the standard brushless to increase efficiency is one thing, running completely from gravity force is something else. 

Hopefully more information will be forthcoming.

Regards,
jeffc

The secret is Driving the rotation via Intelligent Chip's programmed Magnetic Interaction.  Such a pulsed rotation Leads out gravitational energy to produce an engine of 188 Horse Power without use of any fuel.  The axle is horizontal.

The starting battery can be recharged from the Lead Out gravitational energy.  The mass of the 188 Horse Power Engine was 28 Kilograms.

[brnbrade]

@ltseung888 . @jeffc

That this I am speaking.
Brushless is that.
Doesn't matter how it is built.
It uses ICs to drive the coils.
I have a device based on this.
The difference is, I don't use mechanical turn, use virtual turn.
Virtual motor.

Regards

[Humbugger]

@ltseung888 . @jeffc

That this I am speaking.
Brushless is that.
Doesn't matter how it is built.
It uses ICs to drive the coils.
I have a device based on this.
The difference is, I don't use mechanical turn, use virtual turn.
Virtual motor.

Regards

@brnbrade
@jeffc

I think you missed the main idea...Mr. Tseung is telling us that the motor has no coils.  All the magnetic force comes directly out of the ICs, he claims.  No electromagnets are used and (I think) no permanent magnets.  No coils of wire.  Just stainless rollers and IC chips.  Period. 

It sure sounds implausible to me but I don't guess we will get much more detail.  I long ago asked for data and/or manufacturer's name on these magical Chinese magnetic ICs, which he claims do have assigned part numbers.  Mr. Tseung has not responded. 

I think that anyone making such enormous, sweeping and impractical-sounding claims is responsible for answering specific simple questions, but Mr. Tseung does not appear to agree.  I say, with all due respect, Bah!   

@Ltseung888      Please, Mr. Tseung, correct me if I am not understanding your statements and enlighten me with some useful information about these ICs if I am.

[Iosh]

Well, if I understood it correctly, Lawrence basically says those so-called ICs are just reprogrammable magnetic chips.
Searching "magnetic chip" at Google gives a fair amount of related results.

[Humbugger]

Well, if I understood it correctly, Lawrence basically says those so-called ICs are just reprogrammable magnetic chips.
Searching "magnetic chip" at Google gives a fair amount of related results.

I chased the first three pages worth...most are talking about mechanical conveyor belts to move chips of ferrous material, a few are about magnetic bubble chip memories.  None seem to say anything about an IC chip which simulates or behaves like a magnet where the external fields are programmable.

I suppose any chip inductor would do this, but that's just a common (if tiny) electromagnet, not an IC and certainly not an Intelligent Chip.  nice try...no cigar!