The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[hansvonlieven]

@ Gaby,

I am aware of the different drives using similar ideas that have been patented. Like the dozens of magnet motors and perpetual motion machines that have also been patented THEY DON'T WORK !

Hans von Lieven

[ltseung888]

I am sorry Lawrence that you are still carrying on about that silly spaceship idea.

Obviously you have never fired a gun. If you had, you would know that the moment the bullet separates from the gun the opposite and equal reaction occurs. It is known a recoil. It does not matter what happens to the bullet thereafter. You cannot cancel the reaction by putting soft baffles into the system after the projectile hits to ameliorate the effect, it had already occurred long before and there is no way to dampen that.

The "design" is a joke, get that into your head.

Hans von Lieven

Dear Hans,

The pump is a centrifuge pump.  Instead of swinging water bottle, you actually swing water.  This is definitely the physics of non-rigid body motion including straight line and circular motion.  The principle of inertial propulsion system also applies.  The links provided by Gaby are extremely informative.  You can also use google search to get more information.

I do agree that the initial momentum of the bullet and the gun before firing is zero.  At the moment of firing, the bullet travels with momentum mv and the guns recoils with momentum ?MV.  The net momentum is still zero (mv = MV).  However, the force of the bullet hitting armor will depend on how fast it is stopped (rate of change of momentum).  Similarly, the force of recoil will depend on how fast it is stopped (rate of change of momentum).  These forces can be very different.  The water cannon Flying Saucer can use the difference of these forces to work.  It does not use the zero net momentum to work.

The suggested postgraduate student project is being examined by at least 5 professors.  I shall meet two of them tomorrow.  The appropriate minutes of that meeting will be posted.

[gaby de wilde]

@ Gaby,

I am aware of the different drives using similar ideas that have been patented. Like the dozens of magnet motors and perpetual motion machines that have also been patented THEY DON'T WORK !

Yes, I'm away you are still trying to propagate your religion here but you are babbling nonsense. Not lawrence, not me, and specially not the patent holder are ever so slightly interested in your religious dogma nonsense.

You might as well go to the Cristian forum and tell them god is not real or to the atheist forum to tell them that jesus can still save them. Who cares about your negative imaginations? We are after the facts here. Why do people like you have to repeatedly tell people "IT CANT WORK IT CAN NEVER WORK STOP LOOKING AT IT LOOK I'M DISALLOWING YOUR DISCUSSION BECAUSE I'M IN CHARGE OF WHAT YOU SPEND YOUR TIME ON.$#%@#@%%#'

We don't care. You are babbling nonsense. Your evidence is like of "because I say so" quality. I was just looking at this patent and it immediately made me think of people like you.

http://www.google.com/patents?id=AHlYAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1955&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1


I don't remember asking you to say "IT CANT WORK NO NO NO IT CANT NOOOOO i'M MELTING!!! AHHHHhhhh". But hey, you cant blame me for finding this patent just as interesting as the person who paid for it. You cant disallow my interest.

But I want to know now, what is so interesting about telling people that other peoples work is not worth looking at? I make all those links for you and like a child you say " THEY DON'T WORK !"

No mistake about it. You are a liar. There are hundreds of patents right there for your ignorance to cure it self. But you are not going to look at anything, you are just going to pretend you know everything there is to know in the whole galaxy.

Lets run down the logic:

We either know how a patent works and we know how the machine is suppose to operate or we don't know it. There isn't some magical middle way where your opinion is worth more then not knowing the substance of the topic if you don't.

From the lack of this knowledge we may conclude that we do not know if they work. We may also conclude that we don't know if they don't work.

But you are the one who is constantly looking for excuses why something shouldn't work in stead of looking at the things. You are using the opportunity I have created for you to learn as a motivation to vandalize the discussion about the very things I suggested to discuss. You are obviously not going to find any reason why it would work.

And now I shouldn't be talking about them either? That's the point?

You either know or you don't know the content of a document. If you don't know the content they your opinion is a report on your own lack of logic.

It's to laugh about.

There is millions of Australian dollars worth of patents there for you. Peoples creative thoughts, things they hold close to their heart.  You wouldn't be the first to earn an insane heap of cash with a patent. All those patents really exist.

But an invention is something we didn't have already. It's something new by definition. It's not something we already knew existed.

I don't care if I'm the only one who can see the size of the lie.

There are just as much patents on magnet powered devices are there are neuroscience machines for the purpose of manipulating people.

You think that is not real either?

And they keep mentioning compatibility with artificial intelligence as if this is of some kind of relevance?

Things like a machine that continues a phone conversation when the person is rendered unavailable.

It can check your personal data, tell about great products to buy etc anything to stretch time for the original human speaker to return. Who can then read up on his conversation and continue.

In a lot of businesses they already press buttons in stead of answering your questions on the phone.

The public knows next to nothing about any of it. I mean... Brain scans while people look at products? ghehehe!!!! It's mass madness if you ask me.

For our 'govern'ments it's easy to match up the video data and get a person on the TV the whole day, full blown audio. Can like rewind it back to infancy.

The machine knows you better then you do.

Then can administer all kinds of aid to your progress at doing anything what so ever.

The bus doesn't show up, your boss gets a weird call about you just before you are late again. Your landlord gets a bill with your name and his address on it.

In a mater of hours your whole life is a wreck and there is nothing you can do about it.

Study the Pantone trial. Ignore everything but look at the way he is taken out of circulation.

[shruggedatlas]

I agree that it can be very interesting looking at patents like these, though what I find interesting is that all these devices fail to work in different, complicated and very interesting ways.

One of my favorite devices that failed to work in a very interesting way is this one:

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm#buoy3

[hansvonlieven]

http://www.google.com/patents?id=AHlYAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1955&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1


LOL You cannot be serious. The invention describes a toy dog who relies on galvanic action for its power. The electrolyte is provided with vegetables or fruit. 

If you stick a lemon up its arse the inventor claims it can run for days!

I am NOT joking, that is what it says.

I wonder where this one fits into the Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory.

Still pissing myself laughing 

Hans von Lieven