The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Conversation with a journalist who has followed the stories on Flying Saucers.

Tseung: ?I believe you have been following stories on Flying Saucers.  Do you believe in their existence.?

Journalist: ?If we restrict to whether there are Flying Objects that do not use the accepted aerodynamic techniques, my answer is a definite YES.?

Tseung: ?Do you think that such Flying Objects or UFOs are from another civilization outside Earth??

Journalist: ?I read your China Patents and followed the overunity Forum.  You have provided a possible theoretical explanation.  If you were right, almost any Nation on Earth could build it.  There is no need to speculate on a different civilization.?

Tseung: ?Have you witnessed a Flying Saucer yourself??

Journalist: ?I have not.  But there is overwhelming evidence that China, USA and other Countries are doing research in this area.  Your China patent was submitted in early 2005.  The Nanjing UFO on youtube was in Mid-2006.  I have absolute confidence in the technical capability of the Chinese Engineers to produce a prototype within that timeframe.?

Tseung: ?Why do you think that Countries like China and USA decide to keep such development top-secret??

Journalist: ?There is a journal in China dedicated to publishing UFO information.  There are also similar journals all over the World.  The Flying Saucer can be so superior a weapon that it can obsolete all existing fighter planes, missiles, spacecraft or any known defense systems.  It is logical for Governments to classify it as top secret.  They are leaking information out with lies, half-truths, denials, silences etc.  They keep the topic somewhat of a mystery.  That keeps the other side guessing.  Your posts fit their strategy.  That is why you are still alive!?

[chrisC]

Conversation with a journalist who has followed the stories on Flying Saucers.

Your China patent was submitted in early 2005.  The Nanjing UFO on youtube was in Mid-2006. ...

Mr. Tseung:

Still can't get over the fact what you submitted to the WPC is a 'Patent application'?
Oh, don't forget to tell the other side of the story.....That patent office thinks your theory has NO merits and what that means is you will get a FINAL REJECTION! End of story. Now, that's the truth.

So, the moral of the story is don't go around telling half-truths and making your self more important than what you really are. Now, what you really are is a Nobel prize wanna-be physicists with pre-'O' level mastery of pendulum physics (minus understanding of SHM).

You may be able to impress the million grade school children in Hong Kong with your  HK$10K prize money but that's about as far as it goes.

cheers
chrisC

[Devil]

chrisC, why are you still so dumb and stupid?

Tseung claimed that he did not care about fame or fortune.  All he needed is to get the Lee-Tseung theory published.  He claims that is the truth.

Your job is to debunk the Lee-Tseung Theory.  You openly claimed that you can find a 15 year old or head of a department at a University to point out the errors in his theory.

That is the correct way to debunk him.  Why are you so stupid as not to understand that?

You keep wasting more of the CIA or the like money.  They are running out of patience.

[chrisC]

chrisC, why are you still so dumb and stupid?

Tseung claimed that he did not care about fame or fortune.  All he needed is to get the Lee-Tseung theory published.  He claims that is the truth.

Your job is to debunk the Lee-Tseung Theory.  You openly claimed that you can find a 15 year old or head of a department at a University to point out the errors in his theory.

That is the correct way to debunk him.  Why are you so stupid as not to understand that?

You keep wasting more of the CIA or the like money.  They are running out of patience.

Old Tseung:

You're getting more and more confused each day, signing in and out as Devil, Tseung888, Top Gun, Forever. So much so, you can't even remember what I posted! For the record, I posted I don't know the Head of HK Polytechnic (professor) personally. I went the extra mile to get his name and address from public records. That was done to help you breathe a little better, just in case he happens to agree with your 'O' level physics explanation.

Apparently, he didn't want to touch your theory with a 10 foot pole!  Even his student think you're an old idiot! You really need to take your medication.

Further unsubstantiated theories Lead Out more hallucinations.

cheers
chrisC

[Koen1]

chrisC, why are you still so dumb and stupid?

ah, you've run out of proper arguments so now you're going to start insulting people?
And in a childish manner as well...
Obviously this will convince everyone that you're right, so you won't have to go through the
trouble of actually showing that you're right, eh Tseung? Sad old man.

Tseung claimed that he did not care about fame or fortune.

Did he now? Did you miss the hundreds of posts where he shouts about being the greatest inventor ever
who will give free energy and anitgravity to China first and the World second? The man whose
grand invention will change the world forever? I guess reading is difficult for you?

All he needed is to get the Lee-Tseung theory published.  He claims that is the truth.

We know he claims that it is true, he just still has never shown it to be true.
So you're dead wrong there: All he needs to do is NOT to get his theory published,
but he needs to prove it correct before publishing it.
It is clear he/you cannot do that.
Fruitless attempts have been made for months, but you/he/Tseung/TopGun just cannot seem
to understand physics well enough to figure out your own flaws.
Proof is what the theory needs, not publication.
I know you guys do things differently in China, but surely even there you cannot first publish
a theory and claim it is correct, and only much later test if it really is correct?

Your job is to debunk the Lee-Tseung Theory.

Once again you turn the situation around, Tseung!
Your job is to prove your theory. You came here shouting loudly that you have this
great theory that can explain all OU devices and can be used to design them.
You should be the one to substantiate that claim!
We, including ChrisC, are merely pointing out that you still have not shown any proof nor
shown any convincing explanations, and in fact have shown quite the opposite, namely:
that you cannot even properly substantiate your claimed theory mathematically, because
you continue to make huge mistakes, grand blunders, and plain false assumptions in your
mathematical analysis. Typical of people who are convinced of their idea but have never
actually tested it in practise.
Don't try to turn this around as if we are the ones actively hunting you down to try and debunk
your stupid theory!
You came here and slammed your crap theory in our faces, pretending to want to discuss it.
Now we are discussing it and pointing out the flaws, and now all of a sudden you act like
we're the initiators of this silly thread!
You must have had too much British beef in the 90's...

You openly claimed that you can find a 15 year old or head of a department at a University to point out the errors in his theory.

Well that just goes to show how attentive you are. Chris never said that. You, Tseung, have made this statement before, and back then
you were also shown to be in error. Chris said he had some contact details of an academic who could be contacted if you wanted
to get an actual physics professor involved. Then you, Tseung, turned that into Chris actually personally knowing this physicist.
Chris indicated this was not the case, but if you were serious about having university employed academics look at your theory you
could still contact the guy. Clearly you still have not done so.
Worse even, you still haven't understood that it is not one of Chris's friends, it is just a guy Chris looked up on a university website.
If you can't even grasp that factoid, and if that is typical of your observation skills and reasoning, then it is not surprising that you
cannot come up with one shred of proof for your claimed theory: your information processing abilities must be seriously flawed.

That is the correct way to debunk him.  Why are you so stupid as not to understand that?

You keep wasting more of the CIA or the like money.  They are running out of patience.

and why are you so stupid to assume there is any debunking going on, and even more stupid to bring up the cia?
Debunking?
Dude, you can't even prove your theory, you show zero empirical tests...
There is nothing to debunk yet! First make your theory stand simple logical analysis like Kul_ash's questions,
without the entire "theory" collapsing in the light of reason! Then perhaps the debunking could start.
But you can't de-bunk what hasn't even been properly 'bunked' yet!

And stop with the stupid switching of persona's, Tseung!
Just post under your own name,
stop posting as "Top Gun" and others!
It only serves to make you look more foolish if you continue that charade.