The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Whoflungdung]

For Mr Lawrence Tseung.

My comments are below.

WFD

[ltseung888]

I have now uploaded the latest presentation file into rapid share.

http://rapidshare.com/files/115988460/New_Energy_V88.PPT.html

This latest file contains the improvement suggestions from Top Gun and the experimental set up photos from Forever.  This version is likely to be used in USA, in Japan in addition to Hong Kong and China in the coming weeks.

[shruggedatlas]

Things I have learned from reading Lawrence's posts:

1.  What stops people from making working devices is that patent examiners don't believe them.
2.  There are hundreds of working overunity devices throughout the world, but the inventors have no idea why they work.
3,  Only perpetual motion energy can power flying saucers.
4.  Pendulum strings do not change the direction of the moving pendulum bob - it is gravity doing work by lifting the bob.
5.  One-way valves create energy
6.  Gravity is an energy particle, not a force.  (Don't worry, energy is conserved, even though gravity is bottomless, because planets "exchange" gravity energy with each other.)  We are constantly immersed in gravity energy, and should probably get gravity screen, so that we do not get gravity burns, or worse, skin cancer from prolonged gravity energy exposure.

[RadiantLarry]

They can afford to have professional insulters and debunkers. 

Lawrence, we are not professional debunkers. I know that makes you feel better thinking people are going crazy trying to get to your secrets, but I dont think even you know your own secrets. What we are, is people who have a little common sense and can see through a so obvious smoke screen.
Besides, if you have put the info out already, as you say you have, then why would they need to debunk you? If its so simple, can't they go to your site and build it themselves? If thats true then why do we need you anymore? If we ever did? Does the cia have a computer? Do they have internet? Maybe an aol disk?
Debunking implies that there is a deliberate effort to smear or twist a piece of information.
Well, I challenge anyone to come up with a better deterrent than the inventor himself spouting gibberish about ufos and helping the world. If there is a better way to destroy an idea, I would like to know about it. You have chosen, all by yourself, this method of 'teaching'. Apparently you are the only one to use this, as it seems to have extremely negative effects. Beat them to hell with the same unintelligible crap for months, then accuse and berate with your other egos when they wake up.
I just had an image of the future, where Lawrence leaves this group, and starts a yahoo group, where he can control all the posts. The only reason he hasnt yet is because of the hits. He is very hungry for attention, that has a lot of weight. Too bad they are mostly bot hits. But yahoo groups is where they all end up.
Lawrence, this cannot be fun for you? What can you possibly gain? What is the point? If we could help you, as a group, to accomplish one simple experiment to prove this theory, what would it be? How could we do that? How can we help you Lawrence?
PS; Thanks Pirate!

[Koen1]

*salutes RadiantLarry*

Good to have you with us!
We should start a club, called "Professional LooneyLawrence Debunking Assiciation" or something,
print a glossy magazine with a cheap plastic beach pump or force scale every month, nice for the kids.
... if we turn it into a Foundation we might even be able to get tax advantages through it, all of us being
in the organisational board of course.
And perhaps also set up a manicure service in China 'cause it looks like ladies like Forever Young can
really used some extensive manicures... or hand transplants, one or the other.
While we're at it, we may want to consider publishing "physics for complete nutters" books in China too.
From the looks of it, there's still lots of markets to corner there, and too little sense going around there
to do it themselves...