The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

FAQ 6. What should Hong Kong do to lead the World in this New Energy Machine and the Flying Saucer technology?

a. Discuss in academic circles.  Since the entire Lee-Tseung theory is based on ?O-level Physics?, there is no harm in discussing the theory.  There is no immediate threat to the Powerful or Existing Interests.

b. Promote in News Media.  This will be the second step.  Hong Kong has many newspapers.  One or more will take such news up.  Others may attack it as dumb and stupid.  In the News Media World, controversy sells. 

c. Invite New Energy Inventors to Exhibit. When the foundation is set, we can invite the many Energy Inventors to exhibit in Hong Kong.  They can be sure that there will at least be some supporters.  They can be sure that there is the Lee-Tseung theory to back them up.

d. Fund the most promising.  Hong Kong is an important International Fund Raising Center.  After the first three steps have been done, the stage is set for investment.  There will still be accusation of fraud and hoax.  The CIA or the Like will still be there to disrupt and discourage the Investors and the General Public.  (The paid or stupid debunker in this Forum will still post their objections.)

e. Promote the products.  This may be the easiest part.  The academic textbooks will be the first ones to include:

When a sideward pull is applied to a simple pendulum, the lead out gravitational energy is equal to:

The vertical component of the tension of the string times the vertical component of the displacement. 

So long as there is tension on the string, gravitational energy will be Lead Out.  

The ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is when the direction of pull is tangential.

[Pirate88179]

Lawrence:

You are still not allowing for the energy required on the input side for this "pull".  Once you finally do, you will see that the numbers reach equilibrium and there is NO additional energy lead out.

This is like me saying I can drive my van 500 miles for nothing because I don't allow for the gasoline I put into the tank.  You can't leave this out of the equation.  I hope that one day, you will recognize this.

Tell Forever I said hello.

Bill

[ltseung888]

Lawrence:

You are still not allowing for the energy required on the input side for this "pull".  Once you finally do, you will see that the numbers reach equilibrium and there is NO additional energy lead out.

This is like me saying I can drive my van 500 miles for nothing because I don't allow for the gasoline I put into the tank.  You can't leave this out of the equation.  I hope that one day, you will recognize this.

Tell Forever I said hello.

Bill

Dear Bill,

You have expressed the opinion many times that you are not interested in the Physics contents but participate in this thread for its entertainment value.  I am not sure whether I should treat your posts seriously.  The answer to your question is in slide 20 of the presentation in http://www.energyfromair.com/ioe_talk/

In this slide, we show the correct application of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  Note the word correct.
 
Previously, scientists did not realize that gravitational energy could be led out in a pendulum system.  They wrongly assumed that the output energy must be less than the supplied horizontal energy.

With the new understanding, we now know that 2 units of supplied horizontal energy will lead out an extra 1 unit of gravitational energy.  Three units of energy enters the pendulum system.  From the Law of Conservation of Energy, 3 units of energy should come out.

With these 3 units of output energy, 2 units can be fed back to the input.  One unit can be used to do work or generate electricity.  The 2 units fed back could lead out another 1 unit of gravitational energy again.

Thus theoretically, we can supply an initial 2 units of energy to such a machine.  This machine could keep leading out gravitational energy for us to use.  Such a machine is not the impossible perpetual motion machine that does not need energy.  Such a machine needs energy.  The energy it uses is the gravitational energy that already surrounds us.

You should read and study slide 2 again.  If you understand that slide, you can understand the Lee-Tseung theory.  If you cannot understand slide 2, your posts will be for entertainment value only.

[ltseung888]

FAQ 7.What kind of benefits will the New Energy Machines and the Flying Saucer technology bring to Hong Kong and China?

a. Prestige.   This will be hailed as the greatest breakthrough since the apple fell on the head of Newton.  The story of the two old retirees from Hong Kong solving the energy problems and leaving Earth in the silly spaceship2.jpg will be the inspiration for future generations.  The rise of the Red Dragon is assured.

b. Immense Modern Wealth or Meaningful Economic Activities.  The Military Department of all Nations will be under pressure to disclose the development of this technology to benefit the entire World.  If a tiny Island (Hong Kong) demonstrates such an invention, the rest of the World must announce similar and better inventions.

c. Long term Confidence.  The myth that the West will dominate Science and Technology forever is broken.  It is clear that the so-call supreme western scientific establishment has many holes not yet covered.  The World never needed to dig up oil and coal to pollute the Earth.  The so-called great inventions such as steam engine, diesel engine, hydroelectric dam, airplane etc are junks.  Hong Kong, China, India, Iran, Korea etc will surge ahead.  There is no need to develop the nuclear bomb any more.

d. Sustainable Development.  There will be effectively infinite energy.  This will affect almost every aspect of human activity.  There will be big jumps in food production, housing, transportation, manufacturing etc.  The textbooks will be re-written and there will be many innovative camps started in Hong Kong.  Hong Kong will become the Mecca of Innovation.  Ideas such as Mutual Credits will be carefully examined and implemented.  China will soon become the number one nation in the world.  (Thanks to the paid and/or stupid debunkers slowing the acceptance of the Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory in USA and Europe.)

[Drannom]

FAQ1:

1) When did you last have a brain scan?
2) How bad was it?
3) Did they perhaps diagnose severe Korsakov syndrome?
4) Did they perhaps diagnose severe Creutzfelt-Jacob syndrome?
5) Did they perhaps perform a partial lobotomy?
6) Have you ever hit your head very very hard, possibly around the age of 13?
7) Have you ever fallen head-first onto your chop sticks, accidentally
jamming one up your nose too deep?
8 ) Have you perhaps been consuming too much lead in your food? In that
respect you may be right in that it is wise to get the "lead out".
9) Do you have any sense of reality?
10) From which asylum did you escape?

you are talking to say nothing !! that is really a stupid post, that is negative mind energy, stop spreading that ass hole shit,