The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Top Gun]

Inertia Propulsion Systems Continued.

Tseung was fooled by the CIA or the Like group to keep the Flying Saucer information confidential, as the military implication was too great.

In May 2008, Lee and Tseung were invited by the Military College Alumni to present at Shenzhen University.  Many participants were from the Chinese Space Program and were extremely interested in the Tseung et al Flying Saucer.

Some of the participants flow to Beijing and talked to the professors at Tsinghua University.

When Tseung was ready to send his Open Letter to President-Elect Obama in November, 2008, Lee added the Appendix with a picture of the Flying Saucer prototype obeying the Tseung et al theory.  The craft was built within 6 months by some friends of Lee Cheung Kin with Military Connections.  Please study the posts related to Experiment001 to Experiment005.

The students of Tseung, Ms. Forever Yuen and team, all understood the theory and the design of the flying saucer now.

End of the inertia propulsion systems story.

[atomicX]

Inertia Propulsion Systems Continued.

Her reason was that if the effective gravitational constant could be increased in the magnetic pendulum example, it could also be decreased.  Decreasing to zero means hovering in mid-air.  Decreasing to negative means rising up.

I can neither deny or confirm that one either. 

[/quote]
Tseung got his friend, Bill Fong to do some elementary experiments.  The quick and dirty experiment was to place a fireworks rocket in a closed container.  Ignite the fireworks rocket in the closed container and see if there is any motion.  The quick and dirty experiment was far from perfect as the container was not perfectly closed because the fuse was ignited from outside.  The container was suspended by a string in mid-air.  The result was a small but observable motion of the container.

[/quote]

It is quick and dirty, but I like that. 

Lee Cheung Kin contacted his friends in the Chinese Military and was told that inertia propulsion systems were impossible as outlined in Wikipedia. 

This is hilarious.  I guess Winkipedia pwned Lee's military friend. 

The physics of that argument cannot be wrong.  Force = Rate of change of momentum.  The padded surface will increase the time of change of momentum and thus produce less force on the spaceship.

There is a bit ambiguous in that arguement.  Yes the padded surface increase the time rate of change of momentum, but there are more little force adding up together. 

[Pirate88179]

"Tseung, Bill Fong and Wini Woo filed for a China patent immediately.  That information is available to the General Public in the China Patent Database".

Does this mean soon we will have the Lawrence Fong Woo motor?  This is almost too funny.

Bill

[atomicX]

Top Gun,

Like I said in the earlier post, you won't be able to convince people using conventinal equations, but if you introduce your own equation, you're even further away from being accepted. 

My professor once told me, "trust the experiment, don't trust the equations".  I've realized that there's no such thing as a right equation.  You did the experiment and you saw the result with your own eyes.  That's all it matters.  Use it as a thriving force for you belief, a guildance to truth.  I have to give it to you.  You argued with Lee and declared what the world said about intertia propulsion was wrong.  That was bold.  Now you have all that weight on your shoulder.  I have to tell you that people beliefs these days are based on a popularity contest.  Whatever  most popular source wins.   

I wish you, ms. Forever Yuen and her team soon achieve phenomena success.  Don't let critics stop you.   As for why the law of momentum did not hold in the experiment, I only have one explaination.  Motion is not a linear function of force. 

[chrisC]

Top Gun,

Like I said in the earlier post, you won't be able to convince people using conventinal equations, but if you introduce your own equation, you're even further away from being accepted. 

My professor once told me, "trust the experiment, don't trust the equations".  I've realized that there's no such thing as a right equation.  You did the experiment and you saw the result with your own eyes.  That's all it matters.  Use it as a thriving force for you belief, a guildance to truth.  I have to give it to you.  You argued with Lee and declared what the world said about intertia propulsion was wrong.  That was bold.  Now you have all that weight on your shoulder.  I have to tell you that people beliefs these days are based on a popularity contest.  Whatever  most popular source wins.   

I wish you, ms. Forever Yuen and her team soon achieve phenomena success.  Don't let critics stop you.   As for why the law of momentum did not hold in the experiment, I only have one explaination.  Motion is not a linear function of force. 

@AtomicX

Based on your writing style and also not having much gray matter, you must be related to Tseung or one of Tseung's altered egos to try prop up this dying thread?

You need to learn something from the late Professor Randy Pausch, Computer Science professor at Carnegie Mellon University when he knew he was dying from cancer and was asked what he would say to the world if he was only allowed 3 words. He said, "Tell the truth". And when asked a 2nd question, "What if you were afforded 3 more words?". He said, "All the time".

Well, old Tseung has never been able to tell the truth and if you're old Tseung's altered ego, I wouldn't expect you to know how to do it either. But the you could be one of his commie friends, then of course, we can't expect commies to tell the truth either!

It's not so much about convincing people or being popular. It's about being to verify one's own postulates and have others confirm it. So far, only the old snake oil salesman and his supposedly very intelliegent Chinese professors and friends are able to back him up? Talking about friends that backed him up.... I have not even seen one who vouched for him independently on this Forum. Have you?

cheers
chrisC