The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

ChricC I'm enjoying the comical relief in this thread a lot but you're right I haven't and am not planning to go through this phone book thread. I just check on it from time to time to see where things are at. This time I found out there's an actual flying saucer prototype involved until I saw the disappointing one picture from the presentation. I'm just the guy that won't tell someone off that easily though. If Tseugn is really telling the truth or a lunatic in a mental institution that has internet I will probably never know unless I can go to china to find out personally. So I'm always open, but he must respect that and atleast if he's faking it make more fakes of the saucer  .

History tells us there is always going to be people like old Tseung. It's comical alright but it's also not right to post garbage and misleading information to junk up sites like this when so many people are genuinely into researching OU, besides why should Stephan have to pay to store these useless information? People like Bill, Hans, myself etc etc are just trying to make sure others don't get conned along the way and lose their investment. Snake oil merchants all end up asking for money sooner or later.

cheers
chrisC

[Pirate88179]

Quote from Broli:

"As for the other guys that made a sport out of mocking Tseung. Where are the videos that show nothing happening with Tseung's suggested ideas? I mean the ease of his concepts are laughable at best, so where are the debunking experiments? Or are you just as you claim Tseung to be...just talk."

Broli:

With all due respect, since you have admitted to NOT reading all that came on this topic before you, your question does not really deserve an answer, but I will attempt to do so anyway.

I see no reason to do an experiment which results that were already proven beyond any doubt back in the beginnings of mankind's understanding of our surrounding environment.  All of this has been addressed in the posts that you chose not to read.  Actually, they have been addressed again, and again.

A pendulum will NOT lead out gravitational energy.  UNLESS you apply the Lee-Tseung pulses at the correct time, over and over again.  What is this?  This means, you have to push it with your finger, using the right timing, and it will go on forever.  BUT, in the math analysis, you can not allow for any energy input to be assigned to the finger pushes.  So, free energy is the result.

So, why have I not done this myself?  Because, I can pick up any 2nd grade science book and see that this had already been tried by folks hundreds of years ago and did not work.  I will not waste my time doing it again.

Just look at the theory on its face.  It all started with Lawrence hitting a punching bag, which, he claims to this day, hit him back with way more force than he had hit it with.  So, do you really need to hit a punching bag to determine that this is not so?  I don't.

I really do not appreciate, and I am sure I am not alone here, when folks join a topic and say stuff like..."I have not read all of the previous posts but, you are wrong."  It is insulting to all that have posted on any topic when this happens.

"Did you try to ground the red wire before charging?"  Yes, post # 10.

"Why not use wood instead of copper?"  Because this was attempted in post 49 and was reported not to work.

Etc., etc.

So, if you think you have any more to contribute here, I would strongly suggest that you go back and read from the beginning.  IF you can't take the time required to do that, then why should we take the time to read your posts?

Bill

[broli]

Yes because I really have nothing else to do than reading 3451 posts, common be a bit reasonable here. My question was a simple one.

The pendulum example you gave is not the concept I was talking about. To be specific I'm talking about the idea that uses a padded surface on one side what that may be. Stefan posted a video which Tseung also put in his post of this experiment...

http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=anYxNitcrm0

I just saw this for the first time yesterday. It's more that a year old before I even got started in the whole FE movement. Why has it got minimal attention. Why did noone invite the inventor to speak about it here. I do not say it runs using Tseung's theory. But if the inventor can confirm it or not all the better.

Since the time I saw this I kept thinking just what would happen if the pulse was in the kHz or even MHz that thing would be unstoppable as the object will not have any time to rest anymore. Then yes Tseung's flying saucer would be reality.

[ltseung888]

http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=anYxNitcrm0

I just saw this for the first time yesterday. It's more that a year old before I even got started in the whole FE movement. Why has it got minimal attention.

Dear broil,

You do not need to read the 85 pages.  All the relevant information is in the website of Ms. Forever Yuen.

1.   http://hk.geocities.com/winghang20022002/ is the ebook on innovation â€" the story of Lawrence Tseung.  That contains the background of the inventions.
2.   http://hk.geocities.com/winghang20022002/Flying_Saucer.htm is the PowerPoint presentation on the flying saucer.

Other good information can be found from the links from these two articles.

The particular youtube video you referred to contains a device similar to Experiment001+Experiment002.  It does not use a padded surface to create a pulse force.  However, it still uses electromagnets to produce a pulse force.  Multiple groups will be doing Experiment001 or equivalent soon.

Mr. Lee Cheung Kin has disclosed the information in the Open Letter to President-Elect Obama.  That Open Letter has been circulated widely and to high places.  The flying saucer technology will not be a top military secret any more.  The World will benefit.

Lawrence Tseung
Director, Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[utilitarian]

Yes because I really have nothing else to do than reading 3451 posts, common be a bit reasonable here. My question was a simple one.

The pendulum example you gave is not the concept I was talking about. To be specific I'm talking about the idea that uses a padded surface on one side what that may be. Stefan posted a video which Tseung also put in his post of this experiment...

http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=anYxNitcrm0

I just saw this for the first time yesterday. It's more that a year old before I even got started in the whole FE movement. Why has it got minimal attention. Why did noone invite the inventor to speak about it here. I do not say it runs using Tseung's theory. But if the inventor can confirm it or not all the better.

Since the time I saw this I kept thinking just what would happen if the pulse was in the kHz or even MHz that thing would be unstoppable as the object will not have any time to rest anymore. Then yes Tseung's flying saucer would be reality.

The reason experiments like this get minimal attention is because there is nothing remarkable here.  The device exploits friction to get movement.  It is not all that different from walking.  Wheels and propellers are much more efficient, so why bother?