The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[broli]

TK there's no way it would hover at such a low frequency. If Tseung is right the Force impulse is momentarily in order to to make it more constant one needs to augment the frequency.

Tseung certain people will keep criticizing even if the thing shot off to the moon in front of them  . Can I ask you to ask the sir who did the experiment for a request? Can he mount the setup on a flat wheel and run it. If you're right the wheel should spin in one direction. I think this would prove that there's a unidirectional net force?

[utilitarian]

TK there's no way it would hover at such a low frequency. If Tseung is right the Force impulse is momentarily in order to to make it more constant one needs to augment the frequency.

Tseung certain people will keep criticizing even if the thing shot off to the moon in front of them  . Can I ask you to ask the sir who did the experiment for a request? Can he mount the setup on a flat wheel and run it. If you're right the wheel should spin in one direction. I think this would prove that there's a unidirectional net force?

TK asked to see the device maintain a horizontal displacement if suspended.  I do not think that is too much to ask.  That is not nearly as difficult as hovering.

With regard to your idea of mounting it on wheels, I think you will notice that it will not move forward so well after that.

[TinselKoala]

TK there's no way it would hover at such a low frequency. If Tseung is right the Force impulse is momentarily in order to to make it more constant one needs to augment the frequency.
(snip)

So jack up the frequency, if you think that will help. Isn't that a function generator sitting there on the table?
Duh.

[TinselKoala]

Please reproduce Experiment001.  Mr. Tong Po Chi in Hong Kong has done it.  Do you need help to repeat the experiment?

Some people now suspect you as one of those in a Blue Suit - trying to persuade the scientists not to develop the Flying Saucer.

I predict
(a) The "jumping" of the cylinder will be much higher with improvement.
(b) The pulse force or unbalanced force will be much larger with improvement.
(c) The pulse force upwards can be made to be steady with multiple cylinders.
(d) The steady force can be made greater than the weight of the device.  If the upward force can be greater than the weight, Newton's Laws say that the device will move upwards.
(e) Other devices using rotation, flux changes etc. will demonstrate that unbalanced forces can be produced from within.

There is no evidence to show that Lee Cheung Kin and team could not produce a hovering prototype so far.  They had 6 months and very significant resources.

Mr. Tong did the above part-time with zero outside financing and no helpers. 

You are so silly. Keep twitching, it's fun to watch.

The demonstration came out EXACTLY as I predicted, and shows absolutely nothing new and absolutely nothing relevant to the LTLOT.
Do you need help to understand why?

As far as your "predictions" are concerned:
1) Of course it will.
2) There are NO unbalanced forces in your experiment.
3) No, it cannot. You will only succeed in dampening what movement there might be.
4) You have already shown that the upward "force" can be greater than the weight.  Unfortunately it still needs to push against something (the table). The device will NOT stay in the air above the table without bumping against it, no matter how strong the "unbalanced force" might be. PROVE ME WRONG. Get a bigger battery, a faster signal generator, a lighter tube and coil, do whatever you want. It still won't hover. PROVE ME WRONG. Your statement about what Newton's laws predict, is incorrect. Newton's laws predict what I, and others, have been saying about this device. It needs something to push against. PROVE ME WRONG.
5) No, they haven't and no, they won't.

(And btw over here they are called, "Men In Black", and if anyone is one, you are, because you are trying to get creative, intelligent and resourceful people to waste their time chasing rainbows. I am trying to get people to tell the truth and do science. You are lying and trying to "prove" your own pet theory. There's a big difference.)

[chrisC]

Please reproduce Experiment001.  Mr. Tong Po Chi in Hong Kong has done it.  Do you need help to repeat the experiment?

....
There is no evidence to show that Lee Cheung Kin and team could not produce a hovering prototype so far.  They had 6 months and very significant resources.
...

What Mr. Tong did proved absolutely nothing. If you are correct in your theories, just following TK's definitions you will be able to show us you're smarter than Newton and indeed should be awarded the Noble prize.

Just walk the talk but alas, you proved yourself to be a deluded LIAR and worst still, showed the world you're someone who CANNOT admit you're wrong despite being shown over and over again.

Even most idiots would know when to quit.....

cheers
chrisC