The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[todd.hathaway]

Hans,

Our network of volunteers provide researchers just enough rope to hang themselves or be successful...anyone is welcome to present new techs - see www.altenergy2012.com.  Since Lawrence's "team" has provided nothing conclusive through either live demos and/or independent validation to outside parties, we are making it clear through this post that a vote of 'no confidence' has been issued from a consensus of volunteers from our network.  Other U.S.-based researchers are working with our U.S.-based network to bring adv energy techs into full scale production.  Also, we were unable to confirm any of the titles Lawrence mentioned Wang Shum Ho was awarded.  Lawrence mentioned contact with the Obama administration, so he is welcome to pursue U.S. involvement through those channels. 

Regarding your caustic disposition, it is neither helpful nor a welcome part of this discussion, nor do I need to be reminded of previous posts.  Your posts as a general rule degrade the discussion and scare away people who want to be involved but don't want to deal with the venom spewing forth from your posts, and this will be my last post so you're welcome to spew forth some more venom to the wind, as there does not appear to be anything worth contaminating in this particular discussion.  Lawrence is welcome to prove me wrong with a live demo at Jarboe's Mill on May 30-31.  POC is Larry Jarboe, 240-577-1240 or dcjarboe@hotmail.com.

Todd

[hansvonlieven]

LOL

Looks like I made a friend in the DoD of the good old US of A   

Hans von Lieven

[chrisC]

Yes, have fun proving whatever you can.

Then, start doing some real science, by trying to DISPROVE a real, scientific, operationalized hypothesis:

IF, and only IF, the LTLOT is true, THEN, the device, constructed thus and so, and tested thisaway, will behave exactly thusly, and this is in contradiction to Newton's laws.

Only when you have FAILED TO DISPROVE such an hypothesis, over and over, will anyone give any credence to the claims of the LTLOT.

(You may refer to any number of texts on the scientific method, experimental design and control, statistical analysis, and so forth for support and definitions of the technical terms in the above. Such as "operationalization" and "hypothesis" and so forth.)

A couple of electromagnets hopping around on a table top proves nothing about the LTLOT. On the other hand, experiments that would actually be real tests of predictions of the LTLOT continue to NOT BE PERFORMED, even though the apparatus to do so is clearly in the hands of the Chinese "researchers".

That's got to tell you something.

Well, I'm sure Lawrence would claim this is LTLOT! LOL!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28546058/

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

Mini workshops
Dear Lawrence,

I have spoken to a number of academic persons.  They feel that the theory part is simple and well presented.  However, they would like to participate in mini-workshops.

What is the possibility of running mini-workshops to build the following?
(1)        Energy from Still Air devices
(2)        David Hamel devices
(3)        Ferro-liquid rotation devices
(4)        The full Wang Shenhe devices
(5)        Bedini School Girl Motor devices
(6)        Adams Motor devices
(7)        Tong Po Chi Jumping devices
(        Dr. Raymond Ting climbing devices
(9)        The programming and control of Pulse Systems
(10)        Flux Change devices
(11)        Others

Maggie

Good idea.  Such suggestions are positive.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Lawrence,

What on earth is a Dr. Raymond Ting climbing device?

Please enlighten us.

Hans von Lieven