The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

Cry for Help

I finally realized I could not explain reply 643 and 758 to the non-Physicists on the internet.  Can any one help?  Help! Help! Help!

Thank you in advance.

Lawrence Tseung
Saying more Leads Out more confusion.

The problem is not that you can't explain to non-Physicists! You can't explain your postulates to ANYONE! It's FLAWED! You can state your LEAD OUT crap but you can't substantiate with real simple experimental data that can be reproduced. All the claims of being only a theoretician whilst putting the burden on others to provide experimental data isn't going to make people believe. You're not Chairman Mao! Besides that era is history.

cheers
chrisC

[Koen1]

The exact data showing Eout > Ein belongs to the experimenters.  One of them is Mr. Raymond Ting.  It is him (or others who built and obtained test data) who can tell the World the exact data.

I was actually talking about you finally showing us some more than only blabla, with a few pictures and clearer descriptions.
There is still a lack of actual measurement data.
What is your problem? Why don't you simply ask this Raymond Ting for permission to post his measurement data in support of your theory?
Don't tell us that you can't post actual data because someone else did the measurements. That is bullshit.

I repeat ? I am the theoretician that conceived the experiment.  I built the set up as shown in this thread with great difficulty and danger to myself.  Other good experimenters already built better working systems that could be scientifically tested.  The equipment and test data belonged to them.

Even in China the scientific process must work the same, which means that you can quote other researchers experimental data if they either give permission or if you clearly state their intellectual property and copyrights.
Besides, how can you conclude your theory to be correct if you cannot use and have not used actual measurement data from others to test your mathematical construct?
You are increasingly contradicting yourself.
The more you say, the more shaky your story becomes...

It is up to them to decide what and how much they want to share with the World.

Or

Any one can design, build and obtain test data.  They, as owner of that data, can disclose such data to the World.

And YOU, the person who claims to have conceived at least one of these experiments and claims to have formulated a theory to explain them all, should be the one asking them for permission to use that measurement data to substantiate your claims. You are the one making the claims, you are the one that should back them up.

Instead you avoid or refuse to do so. You are in fact refusing to prove your own theory, and using nonsensical arguments to try and convince us that your course of action is not illogical.

I have almost had enough of your continued refusal to present any proper support of your claimed theory.
If you are going to keep flooding this thread with near useless messages and going to keep refusing and avoiding to provide any proper proof of your "theory",
I do not think I will follow it much longer. It is no use to hear you rant but not make sense. I have better things to waste my time on than a crazy old Chinaman.
Oh, and if you feel you are not a crazy old Chinaman, then please prove me wrong and finally show us solid proof of your theory, instead of only suggestions that your hypothesis might be right.
Lawrence Tseung

[/quote]

[ltseung888]

I do not think I will follow it much longer. It is no use to hear you rant but not make sense. I have better things to waste my time on than a crazy old Chinaman.

I should have read the Bible more.  Just sow seeds.

At University, we were allowed to choose and drop courses.  They did the right thing.  Internet teaching should use the same technique.

Even Jesus cannot save them all.  How can I?

Lawrence Tseung
Those who read 643 and 758 are like those who read the Ten Commandments.  They at least know what to follow.

[ltseung888]

How to educate the Hong Kong Public?

磁æâ,,¢Â® is considering International IPO in Hong Kong.  What can it learn from the Hungarian EBM (Gammamanager.com) experience?

EBM has working prototypes available for demonstration.  What was the reason that it could not generate the publicity even though it got orders?

Lawrence Tseung
It has no 643 and 758!

[gaby de wilde]

This was interesting from a web tech point of view.

Hello Lawrence,

I think your idea occured also to Milkovic, see his patent page on it:

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Patenti/Patent3.jpg

Have you considered a similar arrangement in your mind?  If you have some ideas for futher improvements, would you advise?

Here are some of his further ideas connected to pendulum and lever:

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/PatentiEng.html

Regards
Gyula

Dear Gyula,

The http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/PatentiEng.html is blank. 

It's not blank for me.

Is it still blank Lee?