The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

I am pretty sure that I can build the flying saucer (experiments 001-005) if  I have the right resources.
For example, if the MIT gives  scolarships to me and my team, we should be able to build it.

Well Ms. Forever, if you're really really smart, MIT, Stanford or Harvard will definitely pay you not just to attend the school but also all other spending money. That said, if you're really really stupid, naive or delusional like Tseung or one of his altered egos, there's always the local Hong Kong Psychiatric Day Hospital (Long or short stay - your pick).

I think you're too late for MIT, I've seen these flying saucers already packaged for the Christmas holidays in our toy stores in California. It's stamped "Made In China".

cheers
chrisC

[TinselKoala]

Sorry, Top Gun, the device you describe will not sustain a displacement under the pendulum suspension test, nor will it "levitate" without bouncing off a substrate like a TM-er. You have described a basic "inertia drive" like the Dean Drive and many other such what I call "pogo-stick" propulsion devices. These devices interact with weight-measuring scales to fool researchers into thinking that they are losing weight and, if only improved a little more, will take off and fly. Versions like you describe that are designed to travel horizontally, like the Tolchin device or Gennady Shipov's contraptions, also fool researchers who do not understand how to test them properly. I have tested such devices, including ones virtually identical to the magnet device you describe, and much more sophisticated ones driven by compressed air, clockwork, even firecracker explosions.
These devices do not produce reactionless thrust, and neither will your electromagnet device.

[TinselKoala]

By the way, I should note that some of these devices will, indeed, sustain a displacement of the center of mass from neutral under the pendulum test--while operating at one particular cycle frequency. Guess what happens when the frequency is changed, or the length of the pendulum suspension is changed...

[Top Gun]

Sorry, Top Gun, the device you describe will not sustain a displacement under the pendulum suspension test, nor will it "levitate" without bouncing off a substrate like a TM-er. You have described a basic "inertia drive" like the Dean Drive and many other such what I call "pogo-stick" propulsion devices. These devices interact with weight-measuring scales to fool researchers into thinking that they are losing weight and, if only improved a little more, will take off and fly. Versions like you describe that are designed to travel horizontally, like the Tolchin device or Gennady Shipov's contraptions, also fool researchers who do not understand how to test them properly. I have tested such devices, including ones virtually identical to the magnet device you describe, and much more sophisticated ones driven by compressed air, clockwork, even firecracker explosions.
These devices do not produce reactionless thrust, and neither will your electromagnet device.

Let us be scientific.  If you have done experiment001, please give us the exact parameters such as:
(a) Dimension of the rectangular tube
(b) Type and weight of the permanents
(c) The construction of the electromagnet
(d) The padding material specifications
(e) The actual resultant force produced

If you want, you can produce a video to show us your experiment.

If you have not done it yet, you can always purchase the material and do it in the next couple of weeks.  You may be able to beat the professors from MIT in getting the experimental results.

The alternative is wait for Ms. Forever Yuen and team to finish their University Entrance Examinations and do the actual experiments.  It will be a few more months.  Or wait for President Obama to throw resources in this alternative energy area.

I feel that the photos from Lee Cheung Kin are not hoaxes.  They do not violate any laws of physics.

[atomicX]

I have a few questions regarding the flying saucer.  If the device capable of self propulsion at high speed, how does it makes a different from a jet plane.   I'm talking about unless you can accelerate every particle inside the ship at the same time, there's no way to neutralize the Gforce.  Unless you also have incooporate the pendulum to electromagnetic world, it's hard to make such advancement in high speed manuver.

I believe the theory is correct.  The question is that you already knew the government have their own version of the research and probably much more sophisticate than the lead out theory.  Why are you bother to endure this harassment?  Doesn't China university  support your theory?  I don't know about China but here, even if it's correct, there's no way to communicate with mainstream.  I know you know something and it's your obligation to share with the world, but I'm afraid the world can't turn around that fast. 

I'm still thinking about this theory.  I know the tension did half of the work, but what is it relationship with centripital force?  In order this to be a complete theory, I must incooporate it from atomic level to galactic level; and it must agree.   How far did you get on nature? If you don't mind share it with me.