The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

.....
Tseung: “So that is your true intention.  The Chinese Press did not do you and your team justice.  You are going to the world press.”
.....
If they get recognition first, we shall be nobody[/b]. ....

Hahaha! What's the difference? You are NOBODY already! If you really showed verifiable proofs, you CAN become somebody, otherwise the parrot is a better talker than you.

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

Is the claim being made that the "flying saucer" shown and being talked about above, is hovering and maneuvering supported only by a mechanism like that illustrated in experiment001?? No propellers or rotor blades or fans or ducts or jets of any kind??

If so, I challenge that claim, and ask the LTLOT proponents to provide some proof of that claim.

Thank you for your challenge.  I have put the full presentation in:
http://rapidshare.com/files/163249307/Flying_Saucer.ppt.html

Tell the world that such a claim is being made.  Give suggestions that will get Lee and his team maximum publicity.

I suggested that Lee should demonstration the craft when President-Elect becomes President Obama at the lawns of the White House.  He laughed.

But with the right blessing from MIT, Stanford, etc. that can be done.

Yes, We can.

[Top Gun]

Is the claim being made that the "flying saucer" shown and being talked about above, is hovering and maneuvering supported only by a mechanism like that illustrated in experiment001?? No propellers or rotor blades or fans or ducts or jets of any kind??

If so, I challenge that claim, and ask the LTLOT proponents to provide some proof of that claim.

I love good technical challenges.  My challenge to Lee and team is to reveal the technical details and specifications of the pulsing force device (Experiment001+Experiment002).  Many inertia propulsion inventors managed to get an impulse force one-time.  Few can produce a steady force.

I also know that multiple pulsing forces can produce a steady force as in Experiment004.  Thus the mystery of the man-made flying saucer is totally solved if the world can reproduce Experiment001+Experiment002.

[utilitarian]

I will respond to the powerpoint slides.  The upward motion as described is nothing new.  This was first proposed by Henry Bull in 1935, diagram attached.  Bull even set it up with an electromagnet.  This theory has been thoroughly discredited over the years.

Source: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hbimp35.htm

Notice how we have no source for the orange flying saucer picture.  Lawrence, do you have a source for that?

[Top Gun]

I will respond to the powerpoint slides.  The upward motion as described is nothing new.  This was first proposed by Henry Bull in 1935, diagram attached.  Bull even set it up with an electromagnet.  This theory has been thoroughly discredited over the years.

Source: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hbimp35.htm

Notice how we have no source for the orange flying saucer picture.  Lawrence, do you have a source for that?

A similar set up has totally different results.  The Henry Bull mechanism uses a spring instead of a pad or a spring damper.  In a perfect spring, the energy is conserved.  In a pad or a damper, the energy is absorbed and/or dissipated.

Note that in the Henry Bull diagram, the net force is away from the solid surface.  In the Lee diagram, the net force is towards the solid surface.

I still believe in an experiment001 - actual experiment done by one or more independent party.  The experiment itself is not that complicated.