The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

These devices (there are many variants out there) are generally classed as "reactionless" or "inertia" drives, or Dean drives, or Cox drives.

Lee Cheung Kin wants me to ignore all the names such reactionless drive etc.
He insists on using:
不平衡å...§åŠ›æŽ¨é€²å™¨ã€,

or my translation of:
The propulsion system using unbalanced forces generated from within the system.

In the Lee-Tseung theory, we invented the term Lead-out-energy.  This is different from Over Unity devices or perpetual motion machines.

In the flying saucer field, we have to invent a new term - temporarily, I shall use propulsion system using unbalanced forces generated from within.  Until we have a chance to examine the reactionless drives, Dean drives, inertia propulsion systems, we are claiming our devices are totally different.  The flying saucer prototype is already flying.  Lee said that no published public devices could match that.  (The top-secret military crafts do not count as they are supposed to be non-existent!)


Lawrence Tseung
Director, Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[TinselKoala]

You should go and do that research, then, because your claim that experiment001 is working by a different principle, is in error.

And, once again, you are making claims about a flying saucer without providing the least amount of proof. The photograph that you provided clearly is a composite, and the flying saucer shown in it is clearly flying by deflecting air downward with the vanes visible on the underside.

Please provide proof, or at least some evidence, that the flying saucer is flying without aerodynamic vanes, propellers, rotors, or jets of conventional design.

Until you do so, we will just have to look at those vanes visible in the picture, and wonder...

[ltseung888]

The predicted and feared financial meltdown is coming.

There is record US$$$$$ flowing into Hong Kong, Taiwan etc.

The prediction is that the money that formerly was used to buy derivative products will seek an outlet.  As more of the financial papers mature, the cash or raw money will flood all financial markets worldwide.

The stock markets and commodity prices will go sky high.  Inflation will be uncontrollable.  High interest rates will not help.  The holders of such raw money do not need to borrow.

Most Governments are not prepared and have not developed plans to deal with such a meltdown.  Where are their think-tanks?

Lawrence Tseung
Director, Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[ltseung888]

From the sina.com forum

Dear Lawrence,

Are you saying that Tinselkoala and others may have been misled by the Power about the cave?  (The one who does not want others to go into the cave invented stories of snakes and disease-carrying bats).  His understanding or explanation of Experiment001 is wrong. 

He already knows the Experiment001 result â€" the device will move towards the direction of the unpadded surface.

Few forum members are like Lee Cheung Kin and team â€" spend months improving Experiment001+Experiment002.  Tinselkoala does experiments for others for a living.  I doubt that he will spend the time and resources to complete and improve Experiment001+Experiment002.

Maggie

[TinselKoala]

You should go and do that research, then, because your claim that experiment001 is working by a different principle, is in error.

And, once again, you are making claims about a flying saucer without providing the least amount of proof. The photograph that you provided clearly is a composite, and the flying saucer shown in it is clearly flying by deflecting air downward with the vanes visible on the underside.

Please provide proof, or at least some evidence, that the flying saucer is flying without aerodynamic vanes, propellers, rotors, or jets of conventional design.

Until you do so, we will just have to look at those vanes visible in the picture, and wonder...

Dear Maggie:
What evidence can you give that my understanding or explanation of experiment001 is wrong? I have given lots of evidence that it is in fact right, and that it is your understanding that is in error. Did you do the experiment on a proper frictionless substrate, as I outlined above? Did you do the experiment with the apparatus suspended like a pendulum, as in my video? Have you done the experiment with the device oriented vertically?
Please show videos of your results.
If you cannot provide data, you have no business commenting about my understanding or lack of it.
--TK